No, the ball is not back in my court. You simply refuse to answer my questions. So, I refuse until you do.Blackvegetable » 7 minutes ago » wrote: ↑If I decline to answer, it's back in YOUR court, right?Huey » 12 minutes ago » wrote: ↑ That answer can be found in numerous places. Tell you what, when you can't find I pledge to answer YOUR questions if YOU pledge to answer mine in a one for one basis. Balls in court, RUNNY!You just provided more evidence why that pledge is worthless.I pledge to answer YOUR questions
Slack-Jaw...., I’m learning the law from the same place you should be...the Constitution, the UCMJ, and how presidential immunity actually works. Kelly’s video was political messaging, not a legal ruling. And a Facebook link doesn’t override executive immunity, statutory protections, or how unlawful orders are actually defined. If you want to talk law, start with the real stuff...not whatever popped up in your little *** *** feed today.
If you don't answer questions, how does the ball find itself in my court?Huey » 32 minutes ago » wrote: ↑ No, the ball is not back in my court. You simply refuse to answer my questions. So, I refuse until you do.
By, the way, Kelly was looking at sedition. Acknowledge you were answered, PS.
Blackvegetable » 3 minutes ago » wrote: ↑If you don't answer questions, how does the ball find itself in my court?Huey » 32 minutes ago » wrote: ↑ No, the ball is not back in my court. You simply refuse to answer my questions. So, I refuse until you do.
By, the way, Kelly was looking at sedition. Acknowledge you were answered, PS.
No, I didn't.
Blackvegetable » 4 minutes ago » wrote: ↑No, I didn't.
The code can't be a reason he's "lucky" to escape a court martial.
So it isn't that you actually answered the question....Huey » 15 minutes ago » wrote: ↑ You need to go back and read other comment all the way thru. Look for sedition. Keep running PS.
You can't discErn much of any thing.Blackvegetable » 3 minutes ago » wrote: ↑So it isn't that you actually answered the question....Huey » 15 minutes ago » wrote: ↑ You need to go back and read other comment all the way thru. Look for sedition. Keep running PS.
It's part of some mosaic I must discrrn.

It's clear that you lied about having answered the question.
MR-7 » 13 minutes ago » wrote: ↑ I saw this the other day.....
“MEPS Installs Velvet Ropes After Kelly’s Remarks Inspire Historic Surge of Recruits Who ‘Can’t Wait to Question Orders Professionally’”
Blackvegetable » 4 minutes ago » wrote: ↑It's clear that you lied about having answered the question.
Again.
You hitting on me? Trying some "pillow talk"
At least I can still run from a Turkey... I was just as winded doing yard work.Blackvegetable » Today, 8:54 am » wrote: ↑ It IS transformative...
Been seeing this guy doing reps, squatting 365 lbs....he's about 5' 7"...stocky but not chiseled....
standing right next to him at a station we start talking....he tells me that 7 years ago he was 80 lbs. heavier - described a gut hanging down to his knees - at the end of a **** marriage...
His equanimity is written all over his face...all smiles, all the time...
So you cited the code to prove the point that what he did ISN'T that...Huey » 51 minutes ago » wrote: ↑ Another Joke on you, Psycho Stalker.
What Kelly and the other partisan fools did on the video wasn't sedition in my opinion it was borderline. And the pettiness this administration sometimes displays he is lucky he was not courtmartialed.
By "pettiness", surely you must mean "Grafty's 2ndBesty's inclination to abuse the law in pursuit of personal vendettas"And the pettiness this administration sometimes displays
The Anti Trumponization Fund is going to cost Trillions.Blackvegetable » 4 minutes ago » wrote: ↑ So you cited the code to prove the point that what he did ISN'T that...
If so, what makes him either partisan or fool?
By "pettiness", surely you must mean "Grafty's 2ndBesty's inclination to abuse the law in pursuit of personal vendettas"