Liberal Forum

https://youtu.be/kSQ8tZ35t4U?si=C5iKt3PF0ictXKUc

I'm betting on 12/24/2026 in the dead pool I'm part of.
Some people had dates as early as yesterday but I figure the loss of both houses in November will sap whatever will to live he has left.
He isn't doing so good right now but I'm optimistic he'll rally and hang in for a few months. But if I'm wrong and he kicks the bucket before then I won't be too disappointed.

Squatchman » Today, 3:46 am » wrote: ↑

Today, 3:46 am

I'm betting on 12/24/2026 in the dead pool I'm part of.
Some people had dates as early as yesterday but I figure the loss of both houses in November will sap whatever will to live he has left.
He isn't doing so good right now but I'm optimistic he'll rally and hang in for a few months. But if I'm wrong and he kicks the bucket before then I won't be too disappointed.

Where's Jackie?

RebelGator » 4 minutes ago » wrote: ↑

4 minutes ago

Where's Jackie?

https://youtube.com/shorts/jFRTZGgmGo4? ... cF8wOOalyQ

Blackvegetable » Today, 6:08 am » wrote: ↑

Today, 6:08 am

 

 
 

Looks like the Dickhead is awake...

"they them" starts "they them's" TDS lactating as soon as his eyes open...

and the pain doesn't stop until complete and total exhaustion 

notice how DEI Johnny and Squatting Snatch follow the dickhead around like lovesick school girls

Blackvegetable » Yesterday, 11:35 pm » wrote: ↑

Yesterday, 11:35 pm

youtu.be/kSQ8tZ35t4U?si=C5iKt3PF0ictXKUc

If that don't build a little birdhouse in your soul..  nuttin' will..

Perfect.. Thanks for sharing Black Vegetable Music Master!  I am listening to the whole thing right now..  Why did I never listen to these songs before?

To build a structure in a soul, you need a soul first.  We are **** outta luck with the Mango MAGAmaniacal Mad Man!  The only soles he is gonna have are the ones that walk on him.

https://youtu.be/vn_or9gEB6g?si=nHN0DTwHVIBRLth5
 

nefarious101 » Today, 8:40 am » wrote: ↑

Today, 8:40 am

Looks like the Dickhead is awake...

"they them" starts "they them's" TDS lactating as soon as his eyes open...

and the pain doesn't stop until complete and total exhaustion 

notice how DEI Johnny and Squatting Snatch follow the dickhead around like lovesick school girls


 

Yer music sucks...

Blackvegetable » Today, 6:08 am » wrote: ↑

Today, 6:08 am

https://media.townhall.com/cdn/hodl/car ... -800x0.jpg
 

JohnnyYou » 4 minutes ago » wrote: ↑

4 minutes ago

Yer music sucks...

BV the Dickhead will only love you if you have the exact same opinion he has

better check CNNLOL SAYS and Ms. Now and make sure you have the right fake news opinion

Blackvegetable » Yesterday, 11:35 pm » wrote: ↑

Yesterday, 11:35 pm

https://youtu.be/kSQ8tZ35t4U?si=C5iKt3PF0ictXKUc

Market Summary > Crude Oil Futures
79.38
 USD
1.34%−1.08today
Jun 5, 4:59 PM EDT • Disclaimer

!! Seems your **** is taking a hit. Massively.

         

Beekeeper » 18 minutes ago » wrote: ↑

18 minutes ago

Market Summary > Crude Oil Futures
79.38
 USD
1.34%−1.08today
Jun 5, 4:59 PM EDT • Disclaimer

!! Seems your **** is taking a hit. Massively.

       

Are you going to the Freedom Too Grifty Event?

So is Trump responsible for bringing the prices down?   Well, yes..  People are cutting back in the face of a Global Reccession. Demand is down.  People aren't buying shyt. Truckers ain't rolling. People can't even make travel plans for the summer.  And if your brown, don't move around.




The global economy is currently teetering on the brink of recession, primarily driven by a severe energy shock caused by the Middle East conflict and the closure of the Strait of Hormuz. While a full-blown global recession is not yet officially declared, prolonged energy disruptions are severely dampening growth projections worldwide.Current Economic State & ProjectionsGrowth Forecasts: The International Monetary Fund (IMF World Economic Outlook) predicts global growth could slow to roughly 2.5% under prolonged conflict scenarios. Historically, global growth dropping below 2% signifies a global recession.Energy Shocks: The closure of the Strait of Hormuz has sent oil prices soaring, putting significant upward pressure on global inflation. Economists warn that if energy prices average over $100 a barrel, several developing and energy-importing economies could tip into outright recessions.OECD Outlook: The OECD Economic Outlook warns that if disruptions to Gulf energy infrastructure persist, global GDP growth could crater to just 2.1% this year.How Institutions Define a Global RecessionUnlike a standard national recession (such as two consecutive quarters of negative GDP in the U.S.), a global recession requires a much broader synchronized downturn. The IMF defines it primarily by a decline in annual per-capita real World GDP, heavily backed by a weakening of macroeconomic indicators:Industrial productionInternational tradeGlobal capital flowsOil consumption and pricesWorldwide employment ratesGlobal Exposure and RisksVulnerable Sectors: Energy and materials industries are currently the most highly exposed, experiencing significant volatility and supply shortages.Private and Public Debt: The World Economic Forum notes that around 79% of chief economists expect increased volatility in private debt markets, while 74% anticipate the same for public debt markets.Regional Disparities: The impacts are unevenly distributed. Low-income countries lacking energy reserves are taking the hardest hits, while major economies like India continue to see projected growth upgrades due to strong local momentum.
 

JohnnyYou » 56 minutes ago » wrote: ↑

56 minutes ago

If that don't build a little birdhouse in your soul..  nuttin' will..

Perfect.. Thanks for sharing Black Vegetable Music Master!  I am listening to the whole thing right now..  Why did I never listen to these songs before?

To build a structure in a soul, you need a soul first.  We are **** outta luck with the Mango MAGAmaniacal Mad Man!  The only soles he is gonna have are the ones that walk on him.

https://youtu.be/vn_or9gEB6g?si=nHN0DTwHVIBRLth5

Boston, last night

Beekeeper » Today, 9:44 am » wrote: ↑

Today, 9:44 am

https://media.townhall.com/cdn/hodl/car ... -800x0.jpg

   

Blackvegetable » Yesterday, 11:35 pm » wrote: ↑

Yesterday, 11:35 pm

https://youtu.be/kSQ8tZ35t4U?si=C5iKt3PF0ictXKUc

No thoughts, etc...copy/paste. 

Blackvegetable » Today, 6:08 am » wrote: ↑

Today, 6:08 am

Already debunked this pic: What AI says about BV's pic of Trump in drag





VF made an editorial assertion, not a caption based on evidence. In other words, neither BV nor VF can prove that it is Trump any more than it can be proved that it isn't. 

**** moron. 

About the claim itself

• Over the years, various outlets and social-media posts have circulated photos from 1980s–1990s New York society events and charity galas where guests wore elaborate costumes or drag as part of themed parties.
• Some publications (including Vanity Fair, in commentary pieces rather than forensic reports) have reported or repeated claims that a person in one such photo was Trump, often citing second-hand accounts or party anecdotes—not conclusive proof.
• No independently verified, primary-source confirmation (e.g., Trump acknowledging it, event records explicitly naming him in that costume, or contemporaneous reporting) has ever settled the matter definitively.

Vanity Fair could be wrong, and a caption alone is not proof.Here’s the key point, stated plainly:
 A magazine caption is not evidence. It’s an editorial assertion, and those can be mistaken—especially for old party photos with costumes and incomplete records.A few important clarifications:1. Captions are not fact-checked like investigative reporting

• Captions are often written by editors using:
  • prior anecdotes,
  • social-circle lore,
  • secondhand attributions,
  • or assumptions repeated from earlier commentary.
• They usually do not cite primary verification unless the piece itself is an investigation.

2. Vanity Fair has editorial credibility — but not infallibility

• VF is reputable in culture, fashion, and commentary, not forensic identification.
• They are not immune to errors, especially in retrospective society gossip from the 1980s–90s.
• A caption saying “this is X” does not mean:
  • the person confirmed it,
  • the identity was verified,
  • or that documentation exists.

3. Why this specific claim remains weak

• No contemporaneous reporting from the event identifying him that way
• No on-record confirmation from Trump or the event organizers
• No multiple independent primary sources backing the claim
• The photo itself provides no verifiable identifiers, especially given costume, makeup, lighting, and angle

So the correct epistemic status of the claim is:

“Asserted by a publication, but not independently established.”

That’s very different from “proven,” and it’s completely reasonable to be skeptical—especially if the visual resemblance doesn’t persuade you.

 

Blackvegetable » 45 minutes ago » wrote: ↑

45 minutes ago

Boston, last night

Nice.. I do not recognize any band members.

Our local restaurant has become a haven for us..  There was a magazine handout.  It is full of free events celebrating 250.

I don't expect any destinations much further than 40 miles one way for us this summer.  The pool here is sweet and crystal clear.

America Staycation 250..
 

Vegas » 31 minutes ago » wrote: ↑

31 minutes ago

Already debunked this pic: 

Complete ****.

Vegas » 36 minutes ago » wrote: ↑

36 minutes ago

VF made an editorial assertion, not a caption based on evidence. I

****..
The evidence is the unambiguous indication of the source of the photo.


You really are a **** idiot.