Blackvegetable » 07 Jun 2026, 11:38 am » wrote: ↑ ****..
The evidence is the unambiguous indication of the source of the photo.
You really are a **** idiot.
This goes back to your claim that authorship only needs to be asserted. Then he says this:Blackvegetable » 20 May 2026, 9:40 pm » wrote: ↑
20 May 2026, 9:40 pm
Authorship need only be asserted - once claimed it can be falsified, but only with evidence.
Blackvegetable
Unless you post the prompt, you're not showing me....you are asserting it.
Yet, I provided evidence. You provide an assertion. Sounds like you are full of ****. Not me.
****.Vegas » 07 Jun 2026, 11:49 am » wrote: ↑ Yet, I provided evidence. You provide an assertion. Sounds like you are full of ****. Not me.
No it doesn't..Vegas » 07 Jun 2026, 11:48 am » wrote: ↑![]()
![]()
![]()
This goes back to your claim that authorship only needs to be asserted.
Copyright does not prove authorship in the absolute sense. It creates a legal record or presumption. That presumption can be challenged with contrary evidence.Blackvegetable » 07 Jun 2026, 12:01 pm » wrote: ↑ No it doesn't..
The photo is copyrighted..
**** idiot.
To which I always reply with:
How many **** times....Dumb piece of ****.Excellent. You want the prompt because otherwise I am merely asserting it.Correct. Now apply that to yourself.You claimed authorship. Unless you provide evidence, you are not showing it. You are asserting it.
Cowardice.
Kicked your ***: A Time-Saving Thread for Blackvegetable
You don't have a degree, right?Vegas » 07 Jun 2026, 12:24 pm » wrote: ↑ Kicked your ***: A Time-Saving Thread for Blackvegetable
I also had to add on your copyright ****. I am certain there will be more.
You don’t need my transcript to understand your contradiction.
I'm hearing "no"..Vegas » 07 Jun 2026, 12:33 pm » wrote: ↑ You don’t need my transcript to understand your contradiction.
You only need to apply the same standard to yourself that you apply to me.
Difficult, apparently.
Yea...I do...It's lodged between your eyes.
Don't get hysterical...
Uh oh...that looks like a blatant projection. We both know what blatant projections mean. Mary is here.
It means you're being crucified...Vegas » 07 Jun 2026, 1:38 pm » wrote: ↑ Uh oh...that looks like a blatant projection. We both know what blatant projections mean. Mary is here.
![]()