Thanks for the link....I guess you didn't read all the through the story to find the truth...you just puked out the agenda driven horse **** that Democrats are known for.*Roshambo » 10 Jun 2026, 11:50 am » wrote: ↑ I heard about that guy from Texas running against Talarico. He let a child sex abuser off the hook. Seems like this is common place for these new Republicans?
it would speak volumes of Texans if they vote for this guy.
@Buffalo would vote for Paxton
https://www.texastribune.org/2026/05/19 ... y-general/
IDK anything about that, but assuming that every word of it is true, I prefer a guy who got BRIBED by a pedophile over a guy who IS a pedophile.*Roshambo » 10 Jun 2026, 1:37 pm » wrote: ↑ And what did Paxton do![]()
He let a pedo off the hook![]()
He doesn’t give a **** about child molestors
I did. Again here is your denial.RebelGator » 10 Jun 2026, 1:40 pm » wrote: ↑ Thanks for the link....I guess you didn't read all the through the story to find the truth...you just puked out the agenda driven horse **** that Democrats are known for.
Who did Talarico touch? You said he was a pedo.Cannonpointer » 10 Jun 2026, 1:43 pm » wrote: ↑ IDK anything about that, but assuming that every word of it is true, I prefer a guy who got BRIBED by a pedophile over a guy who IS a pedophile.
I do have one question about your claim: Was the pedophile Paxton "let off the hook" James Talarico?
You're either stupid or a liar.Paxton’s office did not respond to emailed questions for this story. A spokesperson pointed to a letter that two of his prosecutors who worked on the case sent to Leach last week, in which they explained that the case went to trial last year but ended in a hung jury, and the young victim did not want to testify a second time.“The child emphasized that he preferred to move on with his life and prioritize his mental and emotional health,” wrote the prosecutors, Brenda Cantu and Dorian Cotlar.
Guilty of what?*Roshambo » 10 Jun 2026, 1:37 pm » wrote: ↑ I see. Perhaps you should abstain? If what you say is true, both candidates are guilty
I wouldn’t vote for either. In this case I would write my name on the ballot.Cannonpointer » 10 Jun 2026, 1:47 pm » wrote: ↑ Guilty of what?
One wants to legalize pedophilia and institutionalize brutal misogyny.
The other made a plea deal that some people disagreed with. Most of the people trying to make hay over the plea deal are actively engaged in the pro-pedophile agenda, working to make it where NO ONE is ever charged again for raping babies.
Talarico OPENLY INSISTS that children have sexual agency. He votes that way. He makes speeches about it. His "advocacy" for tranny surgeries for children is a far cry more off-putting than a prosecutor taking a one-off bribe from a pedophile.
If a man proclaims HIMSELF a pedophile, I am under no obligation to name one of his victims in order to echo his admission.*Roshambo » 10 Jun 2026, 1:44 pm » wrote: ↑ Who did Talarico touch? You said he was a pedo.
It must be your charge levied against Talarico?
I prefer neither candidate
I don't have to make that decision. I don't live in Texas.*Roshambo » 10 Jun 2026, 1:53 pm » wrote: ↑ I wouldn’t vote for either. In this case I would write my name on the ballot.
paxton was impeached by republicans
his lawyer said he is voting for Talarico
12 year old bit his dick and then he punched her.Cannonpointer » 10 Jun 2026, 1:59 pm » wrote: ↑ I don't have to make that decision. I don't live in Texas.
I'm pretty sure that I'm mostly done voting for anyone above the level of Mayor.
The parties work together in a false opposition psy-op, IMO.
THAT SAID, only one of the parties is openly and manifestly pro-pedophile.
I would not be surprized if that were true.
It's COMPLETELY TRUE !!nefarious101 » 10 Jun 2026, 8:28 am » wrote: ↑ funny as hell...the are actually putting this out to their people
Since the Left key positions are disgustingly anti-American, anti-family and anti-Christian, they have decided to not mention anything the party actually stands for
The Left is always the 10 in 90/10 issues and always the 20 in 80/20 issues
I think American's remember very well that these Democrat Leftists are sick twisted people when it comes to children and out right theft
They just keep making it worse for themselves....which is better than them making things worse for us like they used toConservativeWave » 10 Jun 2026, 2:06 pm » wrote: ↑ It's COMPLETELY TRUE !!
AND, INSTEAD of them running on: 1) STEALING BILLIONS $$$ of Taxpayers money, 2) MORE CRIME in the BIG Cities, 3) OPEN borders, 4) MORE illegal IMMIGRATION, 5) NO ICE, 6) NO COPS, and 7) LETTING the NARCO Terrorists and Drug Cartels RUN RAMPANT in America... ALL THEY HAVE to RUN on, is...
"Donald Trump is EVIL" !!
The DEMOCRATS should REALLY... LOOK in a MIRROR !!

What do you say about people that switch parties?Cannonpointer » 10 Jun 2026, 2:06 pm » wrote: ↑ I would not be surprized if that were true.
But only one POLITICAL PARTY is trying to legalize it.
I have a dog in that fight, because I was raised to be a democrat.*Roshambo » 10 Jun 2026, 2:30 pm » wrote: ↑ What do you say about people that switch parties?
all of the sudden they do or don’t support legalization
I say either way you don’t run again
I am not talking about the voter switching nor the party switching. You assert the Democratic party supports legalization. That being said what is your opinion if an existing Democrat elected official switches party? I say if your party supported legalization and all of the sudden you changed your mind, you are lying. You simply want to have the chance to keep your job. That person should find another job. This legalization is a serious matter. You don’t flip flop on that one.Cannonpointer » 10 Jun 2026, 2:34 pm » wrote: ↑ I have a dog in that fight, because I was raised to be a democrat.
I come from a blue collar background. They were the labor party. I was labor. Seemed like a match.
Then they went wall street. Then they went pedophile.
So did I switch parties, or did my party switch voters?
Well, I think I would like to hear from the fence jumper before I make any judgment about his fence jumping.*Roshambo » 10 Jun 2026, 2:56 pm » wrote: ↑ I am not talking about the voter switching nor the party switching. You assert the Democratic party supports legalization. That being said what is your opinion if an existing Democrat elected official switches party? I say if your party supported legalization and all of the sudden you changed your mind, you are lying. You simply want to have the chance to keep your job. That person should find another job. This legalization is a serious matter. You don’t flip flop on that one.
Yeah, CUPCAKE, the REASON it was a PLEA DEAL, that you find in YOUR LINK about 20 paragraphs down....*Roshambo » 10 Jun 2026, 11:50 am » wrote: ↑ I heard about that guy from Texas running against Talarico. He let a child sex abuser off the hook. Seems like this is common place for these new Republicans?
it would speak volumes of Texans if they vote for this guy.
@Buffalo would vote for Paxton
https://www.texastribune.org/2026/05/19 ... y-general/
Like Trump, right? You support itBeekeeper » 10 Jun 2026, 3:56 pm » wrote: ↑ Yeah, CUPCAKE, the REASON it was a PLEA DEAL, that you find in YOUR LINK about 20 paragraphs down....
“I do really love getting life or 50 years in a case when I feel like it’s appropriate,” said Angela Weltin, chief of the Special Victims Bureau for the Harris County District Attorney’s Office. “But there are times when I have to dismiss the case even when I know they committed this offense, because I can’t prove it and I can’t re-traumatize that child.”
THEY COULDN'T PROVE THE CASE BEYOND ANY SHADOW OF A DOUBT, so the PLEA DEAL WAS A BETTER OPTION THAN NO CONVICTION OF ANY KIND!!
YOU **** LIARS JUST KEEP STEPPING IN THE **** AS THAT RAKE HITS YOU IN THE FACE!!
GO **** YOURSELF AND TAKE ALL YOUR G'DAMN LIES WITH YOU, ****!!
Like you said, they are the party that want's to legalize it. You don't join that party and then jump the fence.Cannonpointer » 10 Jun 2026, 3:28 pm » wrote: ↑ Well, I think I would like to hear from the fence jumper before I make any judgment about his fence jumping.