If that makes you feel better about the groomee, I am pleased for you to have it.RebelGator » 17 minutes ago » wrote: ↑ How can one man be so stupid, you posted a picture of Roy Cohn....now you're claiming it was Cohen?
Squatchman called him Cohen and you concurred.....which one you is the dumbest?
I promised to document the Vanity Fair gladiator photo once and for all..Blackvegetable » 7 minutes ago » wrote: ↑ If that makes you feel better about the groomee, I am pleased for you to have it.
What would it prove to you, one way or the other...JohnnyYou » 7 minutes ago » wrote: ↑ I promised to document the Vanity Fair gladiator photo once and for all..
Chickenfried said don't bother.. He already dismissed anything I dig up.
I have done it once. I will create a vegas file for the issue.. I do know the story behind it.. but need to jog memory.
Vegasil could do it himself.. Put photo in Chat GPT and ask for an analysis..
Blackvegetable » 17 minutes ago » wrote: ↑ If that makes you feel better about the groomee, I am pleased for you to have it.
You're figuring it out.RebelGator » 5 minutes ago » wrote: ↑ What would it prove to you, one way or the other...
I could post a picture of Biden with his naked baby daughter and it wouldn't prove....err, never mind.
Tranny and Grammar Cards..
The easiest way to do it is to ask if the attribution is credible or correct.JohnnyYou » 27 minutes ago » wrote: ↑ I promised to document the Vanity Fair gladiator photo once and for all..
Chickenfried said don't bother.. He already dismissed anything I dig up.
I have done it once. I will create a vegas file for the issue.. I do know the story behind it.. but need to jog memory.
Vegasil could do it himself.. Put photo in Chat GPT and ask for an analysis..
You still have no idea who Roy Cohn is, right?RebelGator » 20 minutes ago » wrote: ↑ What would it prove to you, one way or the other...
I could post a picture of Biden with his naked baby daughter and it wouldn't prove....err, never mind.
Yeah.. ibid.. you do know who Roy Cohn was don't you?RebelGator » 55 minutes ago » wrote: ↑ What would it prove to you, one way or the other...
I could post a picture of Biden with his naked baby daughter and it wouldn't prove....err, never mind.
No.Blackvegetable » Today, 4:49 am » wrote: ↑ IT IS A COPYRIGHTED ITEM, YOU **** IDIOT.
VF HAD TO PAY TO USE IT. THEY ALSO HAD TO ATTRIBUTE IT.
Stick to Home Virology.....

Nobody is wearing a costume in your pic.. you are at the wrong partyCannonpointer » 52 minutes ago » wrote: ↑ No.
VF was under no duty to the copyright holder or to anyone else to falsely identify the objects of the photograph.
This is yet ANOTHER act of extreme desperation - which makes mesuspect that Iwas wrong about you - that you ARE capable of a red face.
This was Trump with Cohn on the day your hasty google had him in a toga:
I am at the very party that BeeVee's hasty google sent me to, child.JohnnyYou » 2 minutes ago » wrote: ↑ Nobody is wearing a costume in your pic.. you are at the wrong party
The copyrighted item your hasty google referenced was Trump's 33rd birthday. There were no togas or tiaras.Blackvegetable » Today, 4:49 am » wrote: ↑ IT IS A COPYRIGHTED ITEM, YOU **** IDIOT.
VF HAD TO PAY TO USE IT. THEY ALSO HAD TO ATTRIBUTE IT.
Stick to Home Virology.....

I'll vet that tomorrow.. I am enjoying pool side..Cannonpointer » 30 minutes ago » wrote: ↑ I am at the very party that BeeVee's hasty google sent me to, child.
Are you **** stupid, jackass?
Try answering the question.RebelGator » 44 minutes ago » wrote: ↑ Are you **** stupid, jackass?
You and Squatchass are calling Cohn...Cowen, you apparently don't know **** from shinola.
No...it was the image in question.Cannonpointer » Today, 1:55 pm » wrote: ↑ The copyrighted item your hasty google referenced was Trump's 33rd birthday. There were no togas or tiaras.
No, child, I fed your very language from your very copy-paste into AI and this 1979 photo is where it went.