The Bureau of Labor Statistics reported the national nonfarm payroll numbers month by month. If you want the net new jobs for 2025, you add the monthly gains and subtract the losses. It’s basic arithmetic, the kind your ex probably begged you to learn.Blackvegetable » Today, 5:57 pm » wrote: ↑How many net new nonfarm jobs were added in 2025?MR-7 » Today, 5:43 pm » wrote: ↑ A “national total” means all U.S. jobs, not jobs in 86 metro areas.There are roughly 390 metro areas in the United States.
So...86 ÷ 390 = 0.22
That means the study covers about 22% of U.S. metro areas. And that’s metro areas only...not rural counties, not the entire labor market, not the national economy.
Now compare that to the entire U.S. workforce:
Total U.S. jobs=158 million![]()
The study’s job‑loss estimate:51,000 to 297,000 jobs
Now do the math:
51,000 ÷ 158,000,000=0.00032 = 0.032%
297,000 ÷ 158,000,000 = 0.00188 = 0.188%
So, the study’s “job losses” represent:
0.03% to 0.19% of the national workforce...𝗡𝗼𝘁 𝗲𝘃𝗲𝗻 𝗼𝗻𝗲‑𝗳𝗶𝗳𝘁𝗵 𝗼𝗳 𝗼𝗻𝗲 𝗽𝗲𝗿𝗰𝗲𝗻𝘁![]()
How **** stupid can one be...𝗡𝗼𝘁 𝗲𝘃𝗲𝗻 𝗼𝗻𝗲‑𝗳𝗶𝗳𝘁𝗵 𝗼𝗳 𝗼𝗻𝗲 𝗽𝗲𝗿𝗰𝗲𝗻𝘁...WTF...![]()
Slack Jaw, here’s the math you’re struggling with:
86 metro areas out of 390 is about 22% of U.S. metros. And the study’s job‑loss estimate (51k–297k) is between 0.03% and 0.19% of the national workforce. That’s not a ‘national total.’
Slack Jaw, this is basic division. If it’s still confusing, ask your ex...she clearly handled the math in that relationship.
You are one of the most ignorant **** on here.
Simple MAGAmythics..MR-7 » 7 minutes ago » wrote: ↑ The Bureau of Labor Statistics reported the national nonfarm payroll numbers month by month. If you want the net new jobs for 2025, you add the monthly gains and subtract the losses. It’s basic arithmetic, the kind your ex probably begged you to learn.
MR-7 » Today, 6:55 pm » wrote: ↑ The Bureau of Labor Statistics reported the national nonfarm payroll numbers month by month. If you want the net new jobs for 2025,
From the actual monthly BLS reports Slack Jaw...the same ones everyone else reads. Add up the monthly nonfarm payroll gains for 2025 and you get a number in the millions. It’s arithmetic, not a conspiracy. If you need help adding twelve numbers together, ask your ex... she handled the math last time too.
A citation....MR-7 » 8 minutes ago » wrote: ↑ From the actual monthly BLS reports Slack Jaw...the same ones everyone else reads. Add up the monthly nonfarm payroll gains for 2025 and you get a number in the millions. It’s arithmetic, not a conspiracy. If you need help adding twelve numbers together, ask your ex... she handled the math last time too.
Show me these 12 numbers.Add up the monthly nonfarm payroll gains for 2025 and you get a number in the millions. It’s arithmetic,
No...you can look them up yourself.
BLS says "about 180,000 for the ENTIRE year, NATIONWIDE"
Show any of us 180,000 for the ENTIRE year, NATIONWIDE.....from BLS.Blackvegetable » 8 minutes ago » wrote: ↑ BLS says "about 180,000 for the ENTIRE year, NATIONWIDE"
It adds "@MR-7 is a cretin".
You are a LIAR.
Maybe one of your Golliwogs can help you find that 180,000 for the ENTIRE year, NATIONWIDE.Blackvegetable » 36 minutes ago » wrote: ↑ BLS says "about 180,000 for the ENTIRE year, NATIONWIDE"
It adds "@MR-7 is a cretin".
Bureau of Lip Sta-tits-sticksMR-7 » Today, 6:15 am » wrote: ↑ Show any of us 180,000 for the ENTIRE year, NATIONWIDE.....from BLS.
Your butt-buddy bv is the one who posted that ****.
We all make mistakes..
Mistakes and LIES are not the same. This is a flat out LIE.....
MR-7 » Today, 6:47 am » wrote: ↑ Maybe one of your Golliwogs can help you find that 180,000 for the ENTIRE year, NATIONWIDE.

You turned butt when asked to post your data.
Now post Biden's monthly average over his term.
NO.....you posted this...BLS says "about 180,000 for the ENTIRE year, NATIONWIDE"....show any of us where you got that.