Liberal Forum
Archive
‹
Political Chat Rooms
‹
No Holds Barred Political Forum
‹
These MAGAts Are SFGS....
These MAGAts Are SFGS....
By Blackvegetable
11 Jun 2026 7:30 am in No Holds Barred Political Forum
13 Jun 2026 7:58 am
I forgot....MR-7 » 13 Jun 2026, 7:54 am » wrote: ↑ NO.....you posted this...BLS says "about 180,000 for the ENTIRE year, NATIONWIDE"....show any of us where you got that.
Graphs might as well be cuneiform to you.
13 Jun 2026 8:03 am
that graph doesn’t even show 180,000.........Blackvegetable » 13 Jun 2026, 7:58 am » wrote: ↑ I forgot....
Graphs might as well be cuneiform to you.
so, where did you get this....BLS says "about 180,000 for the ENTIRE year, NATIONWIDE"
So, let's recap the Ignorance here...shall we.
BV posted...Only the zealously stupid, like zeet and a few other local dim lights, believe that 1.87 has any meaning beyond the symbolic. Supply/Demand stooges who believe POTUS can control oil prices.........
Then he posted....Grifty was the entire reason gas went to 4.50 this year.
BV posted...Only the zealously stupid, like zeet and a few other local dim lights, believe that 1.87 has any meaning beyond the symbolic. Supply/Demand stooges who believe POTUS can control oil prices.........
Then he posted....Grifty was the entire reason gas went to 4.50 this year.
13 Jun 2026 8:07 am
It does.....but you'd have to understand arithmetic..MR-7 » 13 Jun 2026, 8:03 am » wrote: ↑ that graph doesn’t even show 180,000.........
https://www.bls.gov/web/empsit/cesbmart.htm
13 Jun 2026 8:17 am
Alright BV, let’s settle it. If you can show the BLS report that says 180,000 for the entire year, I’ll leave the forum as MR‑7 and never return as MR‑7. If you can’t, then you leave the forum as Blackvegetable and never return as Blackvegetable. Deal.Blackvegetable » 13 Jun 2026, 8:07 am » wrote: ↑It does.....but you'd have to understand arithmetic..MR-7 » 13 Jun 2026, 8:03 am » wrote: ↑ that graph doesn’t even show 180,000.........
https://www.bls.gov/web/empsit/cesbmart.htm
So, let's recap the Ignorance here...shall we.
BV posted...Only the zealously stupid, like zeet and a few other local dim lights, believe that 1.87 has any meaning beyond the symbolic. Supply/Demand stooges who believe POTUS can control oil prices.........
Then he posted....Grifty was the entire reason gas went to 4.50 this year.
BV posted...Only the zealously stupid, like zeet and a few other local dim lights, believe that 1.87 has any meaning beyond the symbolic. Supply/Demand stooges who believe POTUS can control oil prices.........
Then he posted....Grifty was the entire reason gas went to 4.50 this year.
13 Jun 2026 8:21 am
You should read that link..MR-7 » 13 Jun 2026, 8:17 am » wrote: ↑ Alright BV, let’s settle it. If you can show the BLS report that says 180,000 for the entire year, I’ll leave the forum as MR‑7 and never return as MR‑7. If you can’t, then you leave the forum as Blackvegetable and never return as Blackvegetable. Deal.
You have 5 minutes for Goodbyes..
13 Jun 2026 8:25 am
Slack Jaw, if that link proved your point, you wouldn’t be demanding goodbyes… you’d be posting the number. I stand with this. So unless you can show the BLS report that actually says what you claimed, the bet stands — and you’re the one who’s out of time. Let’s do this.Blackvegetable » 13 Jun 2026, 8:21 am » wrote: ↑ You should read that link..
You have 5 minutes for Goodbyes..
So, let's recap the Ignorance here...shall we.
BV posted...Only the zealously stupid, like zeet and a few other local dim lights, believe that 1.87 has any meaning beyond the symbolic. Supply/Demand stooges who believe POTUS can control oil prices.........
Then he posted....Grifty was the entire reason gas went to 4.50 this year.
BV posted...Only the zealously stupid, like zeet and a few other local dim lights, believe that 1.87 has any meaning beyond the symbolic. Supply/Demand stooges who believe POTUS can control oil prices.........
Then he posted....Grifty was the entire reason gas went to 4.50 this year.
13 Jun 2026 8:28 am
your time is up....MR-7 » 13 Jun 2026, 8:25 am » wrote: ↑Slack Jaw, if that link proved your point, you wouldn’t be demanding goodbyes… you’d be posting the number. I stand with this. So unless you can show the BLS report that actually says what you claimed, the bet stands — and you’re the one who’s out of time. Let’s do this.Blackvegetable » 13 Jun 2026, 8:21 am » wrote: ↑ You should read that link..
You have 5 minutes for Goodbyes..
So, let's recap the Ignorance here...shall we.
BV posted...Only the zealously stupid, like zeet and a few other local dim lights, believe that 1.87 has any meaning beyond the symbolic. Supply/Demand stooges who believe POTUS can control oil prices.........
Then he posted....Grifty was the entire reason gas went to 4.50 this year.
BV posted...Only the zealously stupid, like zeet and a few other local dim lights, believe that 1.87 has any meaning beyond the symbolic. Supply/Demand stooges who believe POTUS can control oil prices.........
Then he posted....Grifty was the entire reason gas went to 4.50 this year.
13 Jun 2026 8:29 am
It's been over 5 minutes....Blackvegetable » 13 Jun 2026, 8:21 am » wrote: ↑ You should read that link..
You have 5 minutes for Goodbyes..
So, let's recap the Ignorance here...shall we.
BV posted...Only the zealously stupid, like zeet and a few other local dim lights, believe that 1.87 has any meaning beyond the symbolic. Supply/Demand stooges who believe POTUS can control oil prices.........
Then he posted....Grifty was the entire reason gas went to 4.50 this year.
BV posted...Only the zealously stupid, like zeet and a few other local dim lights, believe that 1.87 has any meaning beyond the symbolic. Supply/Demand stooges who believe POTUS can control oil prices.........
Then he posted....Grifty was the entire reason gas went to 4.50 this year.
13 Jun 2026 8:31 am
It's over 10 minutes now....when will you say goodbye BITCH?Blackvegetable » 13 Jun 2026, 8:21 am » wrote: ↑You should read that link..MR-7 » 13 Jun 2026, 8:17 am » wrote: ↑ Alright BV, let’s settle it. If you can show the BLS report that says 180,000 for the entire year, I’ll leave the forum as MR‑7 and never return as MR‑7. If you can’t, then you leave the forum as Blackvegetable and never return as Blackvegetable. Deal.
You have 5 minutes for Goodbyes..
So, let's recap the Ignorance here...shall we.
BV posted...Only the zealously stupid, like zeet and a few other local dim lights, believe that 1.87 has any meaning beyond the symbolic. Supply/Demand stooges who believe POTUS can control oil prices.........
Then he posted....Grifty was the entire reason gas went to 4.50 this year.
BV posted...Only the zealously stupid, like zeet and a few other local dim lights, believe that 1.87 has any meaning beyond the symbolic. Supply/Demand stooges who believe POTUS can control oil prices.........
Then he posted....Grifty was the entire reason gas went to 4.50 this year.
13 Jun 2026 8:35 am
@Vegas @Cannonpointer @Johnny You @Beekeeper @RebelGator @ROG62 @Zeets2 @PhiloBeddoBlackvegetable » 13 Jun 2026, 8:21 am » wrote: ↑You should read that link..MR-7 » 13 Jun 2026, 8:17 am » wrote: ↑ Alright BV, let’s settle it. If you can show the BLS report that says 180,000 for the entire year, I’ll leave the forum as MR‑7 and never return as MR‑7. If you can’t, then you leave the forum as Blackvegetable and never return as Blackvegetable. Deal.
You have 5 minutes for Goodbyes..
So, let's recap the Ignorance here...shall we.
BV posted...Only the zealously stupid, like zeet and a few other local dim lights, believe that 1.87 has any meaning beyond the symbolic. Supply/Demand stooges who believe POTUS can control oil prices.........
Then he posted....Grifty was the entire reason gas went to 4.50 this year.
BV posted...Only the zealously stupid, like zeet and a few other local dim lights, believe that 1.87 has any meaning beyond the symbolic. Supply/Demand stooges who believe POTUS can control oil prices.........
Then he posted....Grifty was the entire reason gas went to 4.50 this year.
13 Jun 2026 8:37 am
almost 20 mins ago....WTF.Blackvegetable » 13 Jun 2026, 8:21 am » wrote: ↑You should read that link..MR-7 » 13 Jun 2026, 8:17 am » wrote: ↑ Alright BV, let’s settle it. If you can show the BLS report that says 180,000 for the entire year, I’ll leave the forum as MR‑7 and never return as MR‑7. If you can’t, then you leave the forum as Blackvegetable and never return as Blackvegetable. Deal.
You have 5 minutes for Goodbyes..
So, let's recap the Ignorance here...shall we.
BV posted...Only the zealously stupid, like zeet and a few other local dim lights, believe that 1.87 has any meaning beyond the symbolic. Supply/Demand stooges who believe POTUS can control oil prices.........
Then he posted....Grifty was the entire reason gas went to 4.50 this year.
BV posted...Only the zealously stupid, like zeet and a few other local dim lights, believe that 1.87 has any meaning beyond the symbolic. Supply/Demand stooges who believe POTUS can control oil prices.........
Then he posted....Grifty was the entire reason gas went to 4.50 this year.
13 Jun 2026 8:44 am
MR-7 » 13 Jun 2026, 8:37 am » wrote: ↑almost 20 mins ago....WTF.Blackvegetable » 13 Jun 2026, 8:21 am » wrote: ↑You should read that link..MR-7 » 13 Jun 2026, 8:17 am » wrote: ↑ Alright BV, let’s settle it. If you can show the BLS report that says 180,000 for the entire year, I’ll leave the forum as MR‑7 and never return as MR‑7. If you can’t, then you leave the forum as Blackvegetable and never return as Blackvegetable. Deal.
You have 5 minutes for Goodbyes..
Hey @Squatchman ......lolMR-7 » 13 Jun 2026, 8:35 am » wrote: ↑@Vegas @Cannonpointer @Johnny You @Beekeeper @RebelGator @ROG62 @Zeets2 @PhiloBeddoBlackvegetable » 13 Jun 2026, 8:21 am » wrote: ↑You should read that link..MR-7 » 13 Jun 2026, 8:17 am » wrote: ↑ Alright BV, let’s settle it. If you can show the BLS report that says 180,000 for the entire year, I’ll leave the forum as MR‑7 and never return as MR‑7. If you can’t, then you leave the forum as Blackvegetable and never return as Blackvegetable. Deal.
You have 5 minutes for Goodbyes..
So, let's recap the Ignorance here...shall we.
BV posted...Only the zealously stupid, like zeet and a few other local dim lights, believe that 1.87 has any meaning beyond the symbolic. Supply/Demand stooges who believe POTUS can control oil prices.........
Then he posted....Grifty was the entire reason gas went to 4.50 this year.
BV posted...Only the zealously stupid, like zeet and a few other local dim lights, believe that 1.87 has any meaning beyond the symbolic. Supply/Demand stooges who believe POTUS can control oil prices.........
Then he posted....Grifty was the entire reason gas went to 4.50 this year.
13 Jun 2026 8:59 am
Same bet johnny boy....Show any of us "180,000 for the ENTIRE year, NATIONWIDE".....from BLS....and I will leave the forum...if you can't show us, then you will leave as johnny you...deal?Johnny » wrote:Bureau of Lipper Sta-tits-sticksMR-7 » 13 Jun 2026, 6:15 am » wrote: ↑ Show any of us 180,000 for the ENTIRE year, NATIONWIDE.....from BLS.
So, let's recap the Ignorance here...shall we.
BV posted...Only the zealously stupid, like zeet and a few other local dim lights, believe that 1.87 has any meaning beyond the symbolic. Supply/Demand stooges who believe POTUS can control oil prices.........
Then he posted....Grifty was the entire reason gas went to 4.50 this year.
BV posted...Only the zealously stupid, like zeet and a few other local dim lights, believe that 1.87 has any meaning beyond the symbolic. Supply/Demand stooges who believe POTUS can control oil prices.........
Then he posted....Grifty was the entire reason gas went to 4.50 this year.
13 Jun 2026 9:06 am
@nefarious101 it's been like 40 some minutesBlackvegetable » 13 Jun 2026, 8:21 am » wrote: ↑You should read that link..MR-7 » 13 Jun 2026, 8:17 am » wrote: ↑ Alright BV, let’s settle it. If you can show the BLS report that says 180,000 for the entire year, I’ll leave the forum as MR‑7 and never return as MR‑7. If you can’t, then you leave the forum as Blackvegetable and never return as Blackvegetable. Deal.
You have 5 minutes for Goodbyes..
So, let's recap the Ignorance here...shall we.
BV posted...Only the zealously stupid, like zeet and a few other local dim lights, believe that 1.87 has any meaning beyond the symbolic. Supply/Demand stooges who believe POTUS can control oil prices.........
Then he posted....Grifty was the entire reason gas went to 4.50 this year.
BV posted...Only the zealously stupid, like zeet and a few other local dim lights, believe that 1.87 has any meaning beyond the symbolic. Supply/Demand stooges who believe POTUS can control oil prices.........
Then he posted....Grifty was the entire reason gas went to 4.50 this year.
13 Jun 2026 9:41 am
BV the Dickhead is usually busy this time of day trading dick pics with federal prisoners via email
and then he man's the Glory Hole down at Bob's Dirty Book and Novelty till noon that way he can save on having to buy himself lunch
13 Jun 2026 9:45 am
180,000 what? Jobs?MR-7 » 13 Jun 2026, 8:35 am » wrote: ↑ @Vegas @Cannonpointer @Johnny You @Beekeeper @RebelGator @ROG62 @Zeets2 @PhiloBeddo
You have to consider the net loss gains.
Grifty's numbers are all **** lies.. Everything he is is a lie.
During the first year of his second term, the Trump administration saw a net increase of over 900,000 private-sector jobs. However, deliberate reductions in federal employment offset these numbers, leading to varied estimates on the total net job change. [1, 2, 3]
Key metrics for the second administration thus far include:
- Private-Sector Gains: The private sector added between 615,000 and 900,000 jobs, driven by upticks in areas like healthcare, construction, and data center developments. [1, 2, 3]
- Government Losses: The administration cut tens of thousands of federal jobs to shrink the bureaucracy, bringing federal employment down to its lowest levels in decades. [1, 2]
- Sector Declines: Conversely, trade policies and tariffs contributed to net losses in manufacturing and blue-collar employment. [1, 2, 3]
DUMP THE TRUMP SLUMP 2026!
Bump Caps Recommended..
Bump Caps Recommended..
13 Jun 2026 9:55 am
Slack Jaw, none of that answers the question...show the BLS report that says 180,000 for the entire year, or admit it doesn’t exist.
So, let's recap the Ignorance here...shall we.
BV posted...Only the zealously stupid, like zeet and a few other local dim lights, believe that 1.87 has any meaning beyond the symbolic. Supply/Demand stooges who believe POTUS can control oil prices.........
Then he posted....Grifty was the entire reason gas went to 4.50 this year.
BV posted...Only the zealously stupid, like zeet and a few other local dim lights, believe that 1.87 has any meaning beyond the symbolic. Supply/Demand stooges who believe POTUS can control oil prices.........
Then he posted....Grifty was the entire reason gas went to 4.50 this year.
13 Jun 2026 10:02 am
Where is the BLS report that says 180,000 for the entire year? Either show the number, cause bv can't or SHUT THE **** UP.
So, let's recap the Ignorance here...shall we.
BV posted...Only the zealously stupid, like zeet and a few other local dim lights, believe that 1.87 has any meaning beyond the symbolic. Supply/Demand stooges who believe POTUS can control oil prices.........
Then he posted....Grifty was the entire reason gas went to 4.50 this year.
BV posted...Only the zealously stupid, like zeet and a few other local dim lights, believe that 1.87 has any meaning beyond the symbolic. Supply/Demand stooges who believe POTUS can control oil prices.........
Then he posted....Grifty was the entire reason gas went to 4.50 this year.
13 Jun 2026 10:06 am
With the release of January 2026 data on February 11, 2026, the Bureau of Labor Statistics (BLS) introduced its annual revision to national estimates of employment, hours, and earnings from the Current Employment Statistics (CES) monthly survey of nonfarm establishments.MR-7 » 13 Jun 2026, 8:25 am » wrote: ↑ Slack Jaw, if that link proved your point, you wouldn’t be demanding goodbyes… you’d be posting the number. I stand with this. So unless you can show the BLS report that actually says what you claimed, the bet stands — and you’re the one who’s out of time. Let’s do this.
The March 2025 benchmarked, seasonally adjusted employment level for total nonfarm employment is 158,377,000. The not seasonally adjusted benchmarked employment level is 157,540,000.
Compared with the sample-based, seasonally adjusted published estimate for March 2025, total nonfarm employment had a revision of −898,000 or −0.6 percent. The not seasonally adjusted total nonfarm employment estimate was revised by −862,000 or −0.5 percent.
13 Jun 2026 10:07 am
MR-7 » 13 Jun 2026, 9:55 am » wrote: ↑ Slack Jaw, none of that answers the question...show the BLS report that says 180,000 for the entire year, or admit it doesn’t exist.
Who is online
In total there are 9451 users online :: 13 registered, 19 bots, and 9419 guests
Registered users: Johnny You, *Roshambo, Blackvegetable, Buck Naked, Squatchman, ROG62, RebelGator, Beekeeper, jerra b, Deezer Shoove, nefarious101, sole, Huey
Bots: DuckDuckBot, TTD-Content, Not, GPTBot, Bolt, MQQBrowser, okhttp, proximic, MicroMessenger, ADmantX, facebookexternalhit, YandexBot, Googlebot, Applebot, Mediapartners-Google, Baiduspider, bingbot, CriteoBot, curl/7