No thoughts, etc...copy/paste.Blackvegetable » Today, 7:30 am » wrote: ↑ So **** g'ddammned stupid..
The Trump administration’s immigration surge into US cities last year resulted in 668,000 job losses, creating a “chilling effect” that pervaded local economies, hurt businesses and affected American-born workers.
Industries that traditionally employ a large share of undocumented migrants saw the biggest impact, but employment in sectors like arts and entertainment also fell sharply as businesses cut staff due to decreased consumer activity.
The study estimated that between 51,000 and 297,000 of the lost jobs would have been held by American-born workers, as businesses that rely partly on immigrant workers scaled back operations for everyone, including US-born employees.
https://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles ... eport-says
if you take the average of the estimates, Grafty DESTROYED as many jobs as the economy generated in 2025...
America can never be great until we turn the Stupid into fertilizer...

What makes @MR-7 's numbers "tangible"?


Go see Clarabelle the Clairvoyant......I'm sure he can fill your bucket if you feal his tits.Blackvegetable » Today, 8:04 am » wrote: ↑
Those of us who fill the tit rely on a functioning economy...
Especially anyone who suddenly loves inflation after campaigning to bring it down.MR-7 » Today, 8:09 am » wrote: ↑ Like I said...people who have a problem...should talk with their therapist.
Apparently more than you, Slack Jaw. I can read a BLS chart. I mean, You’re the one bragging about your ‘math skills’ while confusing a **** localized study with national job creation. That’s not math...that’s you "misspeaking" about numbers. Basic math makes you very emotional. Your ex didn’t leave because of math, (of course not, there are many, more reasons), she left because she got tired of explaining it to you.Blackvegetable » Today, 9:23 am » wrote: ↑ Huey avatar Huey +1 50 minutes ago
Link?
Brandon, come home!
![]()
WTF do you know about math?
Which "chart" are you "reading"?MR-7 » 5 minutes ago » wrote: ↑ Apparently more than you, Slack Jaw. I can read a BLS chart. I mean, You’re the one bragging about your ‘math skills’ while confusing a **** localized study with national job creation. That’s not math...that’s you "misspeaking" about numbers. Basic math makes you very emotional. Your ex didn’t leave because of math, (of course not, there are many, more reasons), she left because she got tired of explaining it to you.
Am I missing something?Blackvegetable » Today, 7:30 am » wrote: ↑ So **** g'ddammned stupid..
The Trump administration’s immigration surge into US cities last year resulted in 668,000 job losses, creating a “chilling effect” that pervaded local economies, hurt businesses and affected American-born workers.
Industries that traditionally employ a large share of undocumented migrants saw the biggest impact, but employment in sectors like arts and entertainment also fell sharply as businesses cut staff due to decreased consumer activity.
The study estimated that between 51,000 and 297,000 of the lost jobs would have been held by American-born workers, as businesses that rely partly on immigrant workers scaled back operations for everyone, including US-born employees.
https://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles ... eport-says
if you take the average of the estimates, Grafty DESTROYED as many jobs as the economy generated in 2025...
America can never be great until we turn the Stupid into fertilizer...
Here is some basic math for you Johnny...JohnnyYou » Today, 10:32 am » wrote: ↑ Especially anyone who suddenly loves inflation after campaigning to bring it down.
Never hesitate to proceed on the assumption that you missed it completely..Zeets2 » 9 minutes ago » wrote: ↑ Am I missing something?
Or is your source simply stating that those 668,000 jobs that were held by ILLEGALS are now jobs that can be taken by AMERICAN workers?
OK genius, so explain it to me.Blackvegetable » 9 minutes ago » wrote: ↑ Never hesitate to proceed on the assumption that you missed it completely..
No....it doesn't.Zeets2 » 4 minutes ago » wrote: ↑ OK genius, so explain it to me.
Doesn't your post indicate that those 668,000 jobs were held by illegals who have been summarily deported?
And doesn't that mean that those business owners will now be hiring LEGAL replacements for them?
Show me where I'm wrong, asshole!
So you're stupidly trying to claim that those employers WILL NOT hire new workers to replace those who have been deported?Blackvegetable » 13 minutes ago » wrote: ↑ No....it doesn't.
No....It doesn't.
Learn to **** read.
****, **** U.
THAT IS EXACTLY THE **** POINTZeets2 » 6 minutes ago » wrote: ↑ So you're stupidly trying to claim that those employers WILL NOT hire new workers to replace those who have been deported?
OK stupid, let's go over this.