Liberal Forum

Ouch! The person next to Cohen is "a man dressed as a Roman soldier" Unnamed. Just some dude. VF lied. Shocking. 



So @Blackvegetable  . I don't expect you to admit the evidence for the reason that you never admit evidence that is contrary to your views. Be that as it may, the evidence suggests that you are one dumb mother ****. 

Also, should we save time? Yeah, let's save time.

This is my reply to your upcoming VF caption and copyright ****:

Copyright does not prove authorship in the absolute sense. It creates a legal record or presumption. That presumption can be challenged with contrary evidence.

Context of the Image

• The Location: The image was captured inside the legendary New York City nightclub Studio 54.
• The Era: The photo dates back to circa 1978, during the peak era of the club's popularity.
• The Scene: Cohn, wearing a traditional tuxedo alongside his extravagant headpiece, is standing next to a man dressed as a Roman soldier. [1]

Vegas » Today, 11:50 am » wrote: ↑

Today, 11:50 am

Ouch! The person next to Cohen is "a man dressed as a Roman soldier" Unnamed. Just some dude. VF lied. Shocking. 

So @Blackvegetable  . I don't expect you to admit the evidence for the reason that you never admit evidence that is contrary to your views. Be that as it may, the evidence suggests that you are one dumb mother ****. 

Also, should we save time? Yeah, let's save time.

This is my reply to your upcoming VF caption and copyright ****:

Poor Veghead. What will he do without his pic? Oh I know...he will continue to post it anyway, even after he knows it's fake.     

Vegas » 23 minutes ago » wrote: ↑

23 minutes ago

Poor Veghead. What will he do without his pic? Oh I know...he will continue to post it anyway, even after he knows it's fake.   

It appeared in Vanity Fair.. I think in the 1980's..

You do know you can ask ChatGPT to analyze an image? I did it once here.  I am not doing any homework for you.
 

the dickhead is nothing but an attention and hoax whore

nefarious101 » 59 minutes ago » wrote: ↑

59 minutes ago

the dickhead is nothing but an attention and hoax whore

The gladiator or @Vegas  ?
 

Vegas » Today, 11:50 am » wrote: ↑

Today, 11:50 am

Ouch! The person next to Cohen is "a man dressed as a Roman soldier" Unnamed. Just some dude. VF lied. Shocking. 

So @Blackvegetable  . I don't expect you to admit the evidence for the reason that you never admit evidence that is contrary to your views. Be that as it may, the evidence suggests that you are one dumb mother ****. 

Also, should we save time? Yeah, let's save time.

This is my reply to your upcoming VF caption and copyright ****:

I take issue with calling that a man, but yeah. It's MANIFESTLY not donnie trump.

And that is coming from a fella who wishes it were - a fella who would be delighted if it were.

It's just not - and only a committedly dishonest idiot would pretend otherwise. 
 

JohnnyYou » 22 minutes ago » wrote: ↑

22 minutes ago

The gladiator or @Vegas  ?

That is the very opposite of a gladiator, sonny.

But you're a democ rat - so your confusion is understandable. 
 

JohnnyYou » 52 minutes ago » wrote: ↑

52 minutes ago

The gladiator or @Vegas  ?

you're boyfriend BV the dickhead

nefarious101 » Today, 3:47 pm » wrote: ↑

Today, 3:47 pm

you're boyfriend BV the dickhead

Swinger..  it's "your"

How many girlfriends does yours have now?

I associate with Black Vegetables..   Everyone does in this centric universe.  Some just want more attention.


 

JohnnyYou » 25 minutes ago » wrote: ↑

25 minutes ago

Swinger..  it's "your"

How many girlfriends does yours have now?

I associate with Black Vegetables..   Everyone does in this centric universe.  Some just want more attention.

How are your eggplants doing?  I sprouted two Butternut Squatchs from the seeds in one..   Thinking about moving forward with them.

I wonder if Trump burned the Rose Seeds Xi gave him..  I bet Panda Bears might have come out of them.

I must say DEI Johnny...you and the dickhead make a great couple...but couple of what?

nefarious101 » 4 minutes ago » wrote: ↑

4 minutes ago

I must say DEI Johnny...you and the dickhead make a great couple...but couple of what?

Average everyday stable geniuses.

Nuclear Science and Russian Studies are compatible.

https://youtu.be/8qrriKcwvlY?si=T-bDGNmubzxKHoG4

BTW @Vegas  ..  This image was generated by Google AI..  Is that cheating or must I go out and find every data point myself to satisfy you?

https://i.postimg.cc/q7jp5LjG/The-rub-f ... second.jpg
 

Cannonpointer » Today, 3:15 pm » wrote: ↑

Today, 3:15 pm

I take issue with calling that a man, but yeah. It's MANIFESTLY not donnie trump.

And that is coming from a fella who wishes it were - a fella who would be delighted if it were.

It's just not - and only a committedly dishonest idiot would pretend otherwise.

Of course....because you have browsing privileges at the Getty Archives...


What makes you smarter than the VF editor who paid to use it?

JohnnyYou » Today, 1:36 pm » wrote: ↑

Today, 1:36 pm

It appeared in Vanity Fair.. I think in the 1980's..

You do know you can ask ChatGPT to analyze an image? I did it once here.  I am not doing any homework for you.

I did. It's response was that it couldn't tell , due to the makeup and other coverings on his face.

Blackvegetable » 35 minutes ago » wrote: ↑

35 minutes ago

Of course....because you have browsing privileges at the Getty Archives...

What makes you smarter than the VF editor who paid to use it?

The fact that VF lied, per the evidence. 

Go back and look at the OP, moron.

Vegas » 48 minutes ago » wrote: ↑

48 minutes ago

The fact that VF lied, per the evidence. 

Go back and look at the OP, moron.

There is no evidence that they lied.


You're a moron.
 

Blackvegetable » 8 minutes ago » wrote: ↑

8 minutes ago

There is no evidence that they lied.

You're a moron.

Like I predicted in the OP. You denied the evidence. Shocker. 100% accuracy.

I don't expect you to admit the evidence for the reason that you never admit evidence that is contrary to your views. Be that as it may, the evidence suggests that you are one dumb mother ****. 

 

Cannonpointer » Today, 3:15 pm » wrote: ↑

Today, 3:15 pm

I take issue with calling that a man, but yeah. It's MANIFESTLY not donnie trump.

And that is coming from a fella who wishes it were - a fella who would be delighted if it were.

It's just not - and only a committedly dishonest idiot would pretend otherwise.

Is that truly who he is trying to pass it off as? Because he has posted it 1000 times. I don't understand it. Nobody outside of this forum has ever seen that pic nor believes its DT unless one is truly delusional. It's his death throes of trying to push *** onto the opposing party, while it's his party, who are the Kings of ***.

SouthernFried » 8 minutes ago » wrote: ↑

8 minutes ago

Is that truly who he is trying to pass it off as? Because he has posted it 1000 times. I don't understand it. Nobody outside of this forum has ever seen that pic nor believes its DT unless one is truly delusional. It's his death throes of trying to push *** onto the opposing party, while it's his party, who are the Kings of ***.

I will pull up the Vanity Fair article tomorrow. 

The story behind the picture is quite complicated..

@Vegas   should be able to vet his own shyt.

The gladiator  is Trump.. The fairie is Roy Cohn

 The picture dates to the 1980s
 

JohnnyYou » 34 minutes ago » wrote: ↑

34 minutes ago

I will pull up the Vanity Fair article tomorrow. 

The story behind the picture is quite complicated..

@Vegas   should be able to vet his own shyt.

The gladiator  is Trump.. The fairie is Roy Cohn

 The picture dates to the 1980s

Yeah, that's not Trump you **** idiot. And passing off "Vanity Fair" as a source is equally as laughable. One can find as much credibility in a tabloid magazine at the grocery store checkout line.