I said I would bring receipts in the AM.SouthernFried » 6 minutes ago » wrote: ↑ Yeah, that's not Trump you **** idiot. And passing off "Vanity Fair" as a source is equally as laughable. One can find as much credibility in a tabloid magazine at the grocery store checkout line.
You can present whatever joke you want. But if you come in here tomorrow with "Vanity Fair" as your source and try to pass that off as credible, you can **** right off.JohnnyYou » 4 minutes ago » wrote: ↑ I said I would bring receipts in the AM.
I can't help you if you disregard evidence before it is presented..
K..SouthernFried » 2 minutes ago » wrote: ↑ You can present whatever joke you want. But if you come in here tomorrow with "Vanity Fair" as your source and try to pass that off as credible, you can **** right off.
Stop deflecting away from the fact that your own party LOVES ***.
Doesn't it feel good you can finally let your rainbow shine?SouthernFried » 19 minutes ago » wrote: ↑ Stop deflecting away from the fact that your own party LOVES ***.
You mean like the rainbow flags flying at Dem rallies and protests? The *** flag you called "honorable".
You are homosexual..SouthernFried » 3 minutes ago » wrote: ↑ You mean like the rainbow flags flying at Dem rallies and protests? The *** flag you called "honorable".
Hey, I was asmuch in the darkas you for the first hundred times I saw it.SouthernFried » Today, 6:54 pm » wrote: ↑ Is that truly who he is trying to pass it off as? Because he has posted it 1000 times. I don't understand it. Nobody outside of this forum has ever seen that pic nor believes its DT unless one is truly delusional. It's his death throes of trying to push *** onto the opposing party, while it's his party, who are the Kings of ***.
I have zero knowledge of that person's intellect, agenda, or sobriety when the decision was made.Blackvegetable » Today, 5:27 pm » wrote: ↑ Of course....because you have browsing privileges at the Getty Archives...
What makes you smarter than the VF editor who paid to use it?
Darth?Cannonpointer » 8 minutes ago » wrote: ↑ Hey, I was asmuch in the darkas you for the first hundred times I saw it.
But yes. That is what the moron pretends to believe, or genuinely does believe.
No need. I already read the article and I researched other sources, as you can see from the OP. It's not Trump.JohnnyYou » Today, 6:58 pm » wrote: ↑ I will pull up the Vanity Fair article tomorrow.
The story behind the picture is quite complicated..
@Vegas should be able to vet his own shyt.
The gladiator is Trump.. The fairie is Roy Cohn
The picture dates to the 1980s
Please elaborateVegas » Today, 9:04 pm » wrote: ↑ No need. I already read the article and I researched other sources, as you can see from the OP. It's not Trump.
You and @Blackvegetable need to get over it.
It's in the OP. I am not going to go back and give an exhaustive list...though it didn't take long. The internet is wonderful, isn't it? Overall, I think it took me about 5 minutes to comprehensively gut him regarding this pic. Contrast that to @Blackvegetable 's hours and hours of creeping around in my profile, so he can compile a list of my posts in his computer's Vegas folder...since 2017.
The photo is dated 1979.

:rofl:Vegas » Yesterday, 10:12 pm » wrote: ↑ It's in the OP. I am not going to go back and give an exhaustive list.