Liberal Forum

Huey » 01 Jul 2026, 7:39 am » wrote: ↑

01 Jul 2026, 7:39 am

Nope.  

Why your pledge is worthless. 

Blackvegetable » 01 Jul 2026, 7:47 am » wrote: ↑

01 Jul 2026, 7:47 am

Why your pledge is worthless. 

 

Try again:


Nope.  Post it in full.   How miles was I within Salem, NH in Sep 22?  

Huey » 01 Jul 2026, 7:49 am » wrote: ↑

01 Jul 2026, 7:49 am

Try 

Try not lying.

Blackvegetable » 01 Jul 2026, 7:55 am » wrote: ↑

01 Jul 2026, 7:55 am

Try not lying.

 

Try again:


Nope.  Post it in full.   How miles was I within Salem, NH in Sep 22?  

Huey » 01 Jul 2026, 8:02 am » wrote: ↑

01 Jul 2026, 8:02 am

Try again:

You just ran from your words, again.

Why do you post more of them?
 

Blackvegetable » 01 Jul 2026, 8:48 am » wrote: ↑

01 Jul 2026, 8:48 am

You just ran from your words, again.

Why do you post more of them?
 

 

I'm not running from my words.  I posting them verbatim, in context and with full quotes.

When dealing with you one must clarify your stands because you are very ambiguous. 

Huey » 01 Jul 2026, 9:11 am » wrote: ↑

01 Jul 2026, 9:11 am

I'm not running from my words.  I posting them verbatim, in 

I posted your words, verbatim.


You are more than satisfied to retell.

Blackvegetable » 01 Jul 2026, 9:52 am » wrote: ↑

01 Jul 2026, 9:52 am

I posted your words, verbatim.


You are more than satisfied to retell.

 

But not in full or in context.  Try that again without the edit

I'm not running from my words.  I am posting them verbatim, in context and with full quotes.

Remember, verbatim does not mean in full or in context.  

Huey » 01 Jul 2026, 9:54 am » wrote: ↑

01 Jul 2026, 9:54 am

But not in full or in context.  

Let me repeat.

Me - verbatim


You - narrative.

Blackvegetable » 01 Jul 2026, 10:10 am » wrote: ↑

01 Jul 2026, 10:10 am

Let me repeat.

Me - verbatim


You - narrative.

 

Let me repeat:

But not in full or in context.  Try that again without the edit

I'm not running from my words.  I am posting them verbatim, in context and with full quotes.

Remember, verbatim does not mean in full or in context.  ​​​​​​​

Huey » 01 Jul 2026, 10:22 am » wrote: ↑

01 Jul 2026, 10:22 am

Let me repeat:

But not in full or in context.

Remember, verbatim does not mean in full or in context.  

Does context matter?

Blackvegetable » 01 Jul 2026, 10:26 am » wrote: ↑

01 Jul 2026, 10:26 am

Does context matter?

 

That's a question.

Let me repeat:

But not in full or in context.  Try that again without the edit

I'm not running from my words.  I am posting them verbatim, in context and with full quotes.

Remember, verbatim does not mean in full or in context.

Huey » 01 Jul 2026, 10:33 am » wrote: ↑

01 Jul 2026, 10:33 am

That's a question.


 

And these are your words

Your context is irrelevant.

I think a clarification is in order.

Blackvegetable » 01 Jul 2026, 10:44 am » wrote: ↑

01 Jul 2026, 10:44 am

And these are your words




I think a clarification is in order.

 

They could be.  Provide the link so we can see the discussion.  As I recall you were creating a false context and were reframing.  So in that case, yes, YOUR context was irrelevant.  If in those are my words.  

No further discussion necessary without you providing a link.

Huey » 01 Jul 2026, 10:47 am » wrote: ↑

01 Jul 2026, 10:47 am

They could be.  

This is why your pledge is worthless.

Blackvegetable » 01 Jul 2026, 10:49 am » wrote: ↑

01 Jul 2026, 10:49 am

This is why your pledge is worthless.

 

Try again:

They could be.  Provide the link so we can see the discussion.  As I recall you were creating a false context and were reframing.  So in that case, yes, YOUR context was irrelevant.  If in those are my words.  

No further discussion necessary without you providing a link.

No questions until you take the pledge.  
 

Blackvegetable » 01 Jul 2026, 10:49 am » wrote: ↑

01 Jul 2026, 10:49 am

This is why your pledge is worthless.

 

They could be.  Provide the link so we can see the discussion.  As I recall you were creating a false context and were reframing.  So in that case, yes, YOUR context was irrelevant.  If in those are my words.  

No further discussion necessary without you providing a link

No questions until you take the pledge.  
 

Huey » 01 Jul 2026, 10:53 am » wrote: ↑

01 Jul 2026, 10:53 am

They could be.  

This isn't a matter of interpretation. 

Blackvegetable » 01 Jul 2026, 11:05 am » wrote: ↑

01 Jul 2026, 11:05 am

This isn't a matter of interpretation. 

 

They could be.  Provide the link so we can see the discussion.  As I recall you were creating a false context and were reframing.  So in that case, yes, YOUR context was irrelevant.  If in those are my words.  

No further discussion necessary without you providing a link

No questions until you take the pledge.  

Huey » 01 Jul 2026, 11:13 am » wrote: ↑

01 Jul 2026, 11:13 am

They could be.  

One set of rules, Sheilagh.