They could be. Provide the link so we can see the discussion. As I recall you were creating a false context and were reframing. So in that case, yes, YOUR context was irrelevant. If in those are my words.
There will be only one set of rules.
They could be. Provide the link so we can see the discussion. As I recall you were creating a false context and were reframing. So in that case, yes, YOUR context was irrelevant. If in those are my words.
This is why your pledge is worthless..
They could be. Provide the link so we can see the discussion. As I recall you were creating a false context and were reframing. So in that case, yes, YOUR context was irrelevant. If in those are my words.
Can't be. You never agree meaning it was never implemented. I'm good. I'll just carry on not answering your questions.
I am trying out my solar powered air fryer..Huey » 01 Jul 2026, 12:28 pm » wrote: ↑ Can't be. You never agree meaning it was never implemented. I'm good. I'll just carry on not answering your questions.
The great debate of how to debate continues.Huey » 01 Jul 2026, 12:28 pm » wrote: ↑ Can't be. You never agree meaning it was never implemented. I'm good. I'll just carry on not answering your questions.

Blackvegetable » 01 Jul 2026, 12:53 pm » wrote: ↑
It is...
Anything subject to your "interpretation" is...
Nah, I'm done. He is putting me to sleep.
You want to see examples?
Snore....ZZZZzzzzzzzzzzz
They haunt..
Welcome to Ancient Flatulism..