Liberal Forum

not sure he can do that. In order to do that “he” would have to know the definition of “woman”. 
He doesn’t.

viewtopic.php?t=74773&p=2258063&liberal ... 1#p2258063

I have address the question in the title.  Earlier I answered the question in the Op.  I answered your demand to define woman although you seem confused on that definition

https://archive.liberalforum.net/p/171509

He already posted his definition meaning he also doesn’t need woman defined for him. ...

https://archive.liberalforum.net/p/171395


The point being is I don’t need someone to define “woman”: or me. No, what is your definition?


https://archive.liberalforum.net/p/169527

Have you come up with that definition of "woman" yet? ...

https://archive.liberalforum.net/p/87568

No questions. Waiting for your definition of woman. ...


https://archive.liberalforum.net/p/69336


You were asked to give a definition of what a woman is in your own words. You failed. You posted an article about a woman with high tester one levels. You have ran ever since.


viewtopic.php?t=67628&p=2046764&liberal ... d#p2046764


OK....too easy...

2026In a February 2026 interview with CNN, Khelif revealed that she has high levels of testosterone, which she has been reducing under medical supervision; she also indicated her willingness to undergo the mandatory sex verification tests required by the IOC.[11]In a February 2026 interview with L'Équipe, Khelif was asked: "To be clear, you have a female phenotype but possess the SRY gene, an indicator of masculinity", to which she responded: "Yes, and it’s natural. I have female hormones."[82] 


viewtopic.php?t=67628&p=2046764&liberal ... d#p2046764


OK...too cruel





Bueller?

Blackvegetable » 25 Jun 2026, 7:21 am » wrote: ↑

25 Jun 2026, 7:21 am

There are, literally, 100s like them....except for the last one, of course...

Sure, people are born with two heads....what's your answer, to buy hats in bulk?
 

Blackvegetable » 25 Jun 2026, 7:21 am » wrote: ↑

25 Jun 2026, 7:21 am

There are, literally, 100s like them....except for the last one, of course...

No users have been banned from this thread. 

Only their posts, you chicken ****, little bitch.

Blackvegetable » 25 Jun 2026, 7:21 am » wrote: ↑

25 Jun 2026, 7:21 am

There are, literally, 100s like them....except for the last one, of course...

Yes!  Another meltdown call out thread!  Gotta be a record.

Stickied to show what a real meltdown looks like.

Huey » 25 Jun 2026, 7:47 am » wrote: ↑

25 Jun 2026, 7:47 am

Stickied to show what a real meltdown looks like.

and what the **** is the point of the OP from no stand anyway? every quote he relays could be his, other than the last…SMH…just an attention seeking child…like his sok, noIQ…

Blackvegetable » 25 Jun 2026, 7:19 am » wrote: ↑

25 Jun 2026, 7:19 am

not sure he can do that. In order to do that “he” would have to know the definition of “woman”. 
He doesn’t.

viewtopic.php?t=74773&p=2258063&liberal ... 1#p2258063

I have address the question in the title.  Earlier I answered the question in the Op.  I answered your demand to define woman although you seem confused on that definition

https://archive.liberalforum.net/p/171509

He already posted his definition meaning he also doesn’t need woman defined for him. ...

https://archive.liberalforum.net/p/171395

The point being is I don’t need someone to define “woman”: or me. No, what is your definition?

https://archive.liberalforum.net/p/169527

Have you come up with that definition of "woman" yet? ...

https://archive.liberalforum.net/p/87568

No questions. Waiting for your definition of woman. ...

https://archive.liberalforum.net/p/69336

You were asked to give a definition of what a woman is in your own words. You failed. You posted an article about a woman with high tester one levels. You have ran ever since.

viewtopic.php?t=67628&p=2046764&liberal ... d#p2046764

OK....too easy...

2026In a February 2026 interview with CNN, Khelif revealed that she has high levels of testosterone, which she has been reducing under medical supervision; she also indicated her willingness to undergo the mandatory sex verification tests required by the IOC.[11]In a February 2026 interview with L'Équipe, Khelif was asked: "To be clear, you have a female phenotype but possess the SRY gene, an indicator of masculinity", to which she responded: "Yes, and it’s natural. I have female hormones."[82] 

viewtopic.php?t=67628&p=2046764&liberal ... d#p2046764

OK...too cruel

Bueller?

All I see is the obsession that dopey liberals like you have regarding what determines the sex of human beings.
And the fact is that those of us with working brains don't need to be dragged into a dissertation on how a determined liberal thinks he can change that determination. 

So like Huey says, "Talk to yourself", fool!
Or just continue playing with yourself till you figure it out!
 

Blackvegetable » 25 Jun 2026, 12:06 pm » wrote: ↑

25 Jun 2026, 12:06 pm

They're @*TinyVictim's words...

Yeah, and it's good advice for ALL who are as dumb as you to spend time trying to establish such a ridiculous left-wing agenda that feels the need to try to redefine the genetic makeup of humans.

But it's your time to waste, and obviously you don't care HOW stupid it makes you appear!
 

Blackvegetable » 25 Jun 2026, 7:19 am » wrote: ↑

25 Jun 2026, 7:19 am

not sure he can do that. In order to do that “he” would have to know the definition of “woman”. 
He doesn’t.

viewtopic.php?t=74773&p=2258063&liberal ... 1#p2258063

I have address the question in the title.  Earlier I answered the question in the Op.  I answered your demand to define woman although you seem confused on that definition

https://archive.liberalforum.net/p/171509

He already posted his definition meaning he also doesn’t need woman defined for him. ...

https://archive.liberalforum.net/p/171395

The point being is I don’t need someone to define “woman”: or me. No, what is your definition?

https://archive.liberalforum.net/p/169527

Have you come up with that definition of "woman" yet? ...

https://archive.liberalforum.net/p/87568

No questions. Waiting for your definition of woman. ...

https://archive.liberalforum.net/p/69336

You were asked to give a definition of what a woman is in your own words. You failed. You posted an article about a woman with high tester one levels. You have ran ever since.

viewtopic.php?t=67628&p=2046764&liberal ... d#p2046764

OK....too easy...

2026In a February 2026 interview with CNN, Khelif revealed that she has high levels of testosterone, which she has been reducing under medical supervision; she also indicated her willingness to undergo the mandatory sex verification tests required by the IOC.[11]In a February 2026 interview with L'Équipe, Khelif was asked: "To be clear, you have a female phenotype but possess the SRY gene, an indicator of masculinity", to which she responded: "Yes, and it’s natural. I have female hormones."[82] 

viewtopic.php?t=67628&p=2046764&liberal ... d#p2046764

OK...too cruel

Bueller?

No thoughts, etc...copy/paste.

Blackvegetable » 25 Jun 2026, 7:19 am » wrote: ↑

25 Jun 2026, 7:19 am

not sure he can do that. In order to do that “he” would have to know the definition of “woman”. 
He doesn’t.

viewtopic.php?t=74773&p=2258063&liberal ... 1#p2258063

I have address the question in the title.  Earlier I answered the question in the Op.  I answered your demand to define woman although you seem confused on that definition

https://archive.liberalforum.net/p/171509

He already posted his definition meaning he also doesn’t need woman defined for him. ...

https://archive.liberalforum.net/p/171395


The point being is I don’t need someone to define “woman”: or me. No, what is your definition?


https://archive.liberalforum.net/p/169527

Have you come up with that definition of "woman" yet? ...

https://archive.liberalforum.net/p/87568

No questions. Waiting for your definition of woman. ...


https://archive.liberalforum.net/p/69336


You were asked to give a definition of what a woman is in your own words. You failed. You posted an article about a woman with high tester one levels. You have ran ever since.


viewtopic.php?t=67628&p=2046764&liberal ... d#p2046764


OK....too easy...

2026In a February 2026 interview with CNN, Khelif revealed that she has high levels of testosterone, which she has been reducing under medical supervision; she also indicated her willingness to undergo the mandatory sex verification tests required by the IOC.[11]In a February 2026 interview with L'Équipe, Khelif was asked: "To be clear, you have a female phenotype but possess the SRY gene, an indicator of masculinity", to which she responded: "Yes, and it’s natural. I have female hormones."[82] 


viewtopic.php?t=67628&p=2046764&liberal ... d#p2046764


OK...too cruel





Bueller?

this species has two reproductive genders never same ancestors any generation gap since inception of ancestral lineages so far.

Male or female body type isn't a state of mind after birth. Birth defects can create an illusion of an ancestor having both genitalia, but it is still just a birth defect of the individual or inherited chromosomes of a previous ancestor in the chain of events to conceptions sustaining ancestral lineages alive each next rotation of the planet revolving around a specific star, in a specific galaxy, in this specific moment.

Series parallel time displaced means spontaneously one of a kind simultaneously evolving now as conceived by previous ancestry and not become 1 of 2 [parents since birth.

Blackvegetable » 25 Jun 2026, 7:19 am » wrote: ↑

25 Jun 2026, 7:19 am

not sure he can do that. In order to do that “he” would have to know the definition of “woman”. 
He doesn’t.

viewtopic.php?t=74773&p=2258063&liberal ... 1#p2258063

I have address the question in the title.  Earlier I answered the question in the Op.  I answered your demand to define woman although you seem confused on that definition

https://archive.liberalforum.net/p/171509

He already posted his definition meaning he also doesn’t need woman defined for him. ...

https://archive.liberalforum.net/p/171395

The point being is I don’t need someone to define “woman”: or me. No, what is your definition?

https://archive.liberalforum.net/p/169527

Have you come up with that definition of "woman" yet? ...

https://archive.liberalforum.net/p/87568

No questions. Waiting for your definition of woman. ...

https://archive.liberalforum.net/p/69336

You were asked to give a definition of what a woman is in your own words. You failed. You posted an article about a woman with high tester one levels. You have ran ever since.

viewtopic.php?t=67628&p=2046764&liberal ... d#p2046764

OK....too easy...

2026In a February 2026 interview with CNN, Khelif revealed that she has high levels of testosterone, which she has been reducing under medical supervision; she also indicated her willingness to undergo the mandatory sex verification tests required by the IOC.[11]In a February 2026 interview with L'Équipe, Khelif was asked: "To be clear, you have a female phenotype but possess the SRY gene, an indicator of masculinity", to which she responded: "Yes, and it’s natural. I have female hormones."[82] 

viewtopic.php?t=67628&p=2046764&liberal ... d#p2046764

OK...too cruel

Bueller?

 

Blackvegetable » 25 Jun 2026, 7:19 am » wrote: ↑

25 Jun 2026, 7:19 am

not sure he can do that. In order to do that “he” would have to know the definition of “woman”. 
He doesn’t.

What is a physically existing human body since conception?

An ancestor of specific ancestry currently inhabiting time alive now.

How, why, what, where, when, which, whom is the topic of this debate between people ignoring how actual evolving works adapting in space daily here.

People that argue over possibilities life wasn't what it became so far are avoiding their own behavior since birth protecting the secrets their ancestry performed cradle to grave each generation gap in history to current events of the whole human population in this atmosphere.

Yours and Huey's mind argue life isn't what it was or is here now. You and Vegas do the same thing. Each ancestor defending their character assumed after birth was trained and regulated since birth to perform the same way in every society governed by rule of laws defining who's who between cradle to grave/birth to dead.

Human individual life cycle lasts conceived to decomposed as spontaneously existing simultaneously here each rotation of the planet their heartbeat adds changes between fertilized cell and decomposed corpse.

Time existing each rotation of the planet one's own body is never same total sum twice is part of the whole process of evolving as displaced since conception inhabiting time daily here.

Speed of light isn't faster than time light travels so far. the energy that ;light is produced from is the magnetic polarities of same polarity won't touch and electricity in DC currents works same way light bands do in white light. One at a time in series parallel results.

Balance comes between time existing between expanding details and contracting results never same outcomes twice working the same way here now for each example inhabiting time as universally here be it composed by molecular content or cellular generation gaps of ancestries of previous ancestry and current ancestors populating space now.

DNA defines the lineage of species and lineage, Chromosomes define the ancestors being specific asexual, male, female body types each generation existed since inception to conception of another generation gap here now.

Self evident time alive is your own brain navigating space proportionately live, now-here and no-where else possible. DNA and chromosomes are what you been since conception.

Context and vernacular tribalism is what your ancestry has done throughout history.