Liberal Forum

@Blackvegetable   You can't hide here coward. 

@Huey  


not sure he can do that. In order to do that “he” would have to know the definition of “woman”. 
He doesn’t.

viewtopic.php?t=74773&p=2258063&liberal ... 1#p2258063

I have address the question in the title.  Earlier I answered the question in the Op.  I answered your demand to define woman although you seem confused on that definition

https://archive.liberalforum.net/p/171509

He already posted his definition meaning he also doesn’t need woman defined for him. ...

https://archive.liberalforum.net/p/171395


The point being is I don’t need someone to define “woman”: or me. No, what is your definition?


https://archive.liberalforum.net/p/169527

Have you come up with that definition of "woman" yet? ...

https://archive.liberalforum.net/p/87568

No questions. Waiting for your definition of woman. ...


https://archive.liberalforum.net/p/69336


You were asked to give a definition of what a woman is in your own words. You failed. You posted an article about a woman with high tester one levels. You have ran ever since.


viewtopic.php?t=67628&p=2046764&liberal ... d#p2046764


OK....too easy...

2026In a February 2026 interview with CNN, Khelif revealed that she has high levels of testosterone, which she has been reducing under medical supervision; she also indicated her willingness to undergo the mandatory sex verification tests required by the IOC.[11]In a February 2026 interview with L'Équipe, Khelif was asked: "To be clear, you have a female phenotype but possess the SRY gene, an indicator of masculinity", to which she responded: "Yes, and it’s natural. I have female hormones."[82] 
 

Vegas » 25 Jun 2026, 12:49 pm » wrote: ↑

25 Jun 2026, 12:49 pm

@Blackvegetable   You can't hide here coward. 

@Huey  


not sure he can do that. In order to do that “he” would have to know the definition of “woman”. 
He doesn’t.

viewtopic.php?t=74773&p=2258063&liberal ... 1#p2258063

I have address the question in the title.  Earlier I answered the question in the Op.  I answered your demand to define woman although you seem confused on that definition

https://archive.liberalforum.net/p/171509

He already posted his definition meaning he also doesn’t need woman defined for him. ...

https://archive.liberalforum.net/p/171395


The point being is I don’t need someone to define “woman”: or me. No, what is your definition?


https://archive.liberalforum.net/p/169527

Have you come up with that definition of "woman" yet? ...

https://archive.liberalforum.net/p/87568

No questions. Waiting for your definition of woman. ...


https://archive.liberalforum.net/p/69336


You were asked to give a definition of what a woman is in your own words. You failed. You posted an article about a woman with high tester one levels. You have ran ever since.


viewtopic.php?t=67628&p=2046764&liberal ... d#p2046764


OK....too easy...

2026In a February 2026 interview with CNN, Khelif revealed that she has high levels of testosterone, which she has been reducing under medical supervision; she also indicated her willingness to undergo the mandatory sex verification tests required by the IOC.[11]In a February 2026 interview with L'Équipe, Khelif was asked: "To be clear, you have a female phenotype but possess the SRY gene, an indicator of masculinity", to which she responded: "Yes, and it’s natural. I have female hormones."[82] 
 

 

Thanks.

Ok, BV, none of what you posted is different stands on the issue in question.  When you find my stance(s) that you claim to know we can discuss it.

@Blackvegetable  

Here are your words:

No, because you made this comment:

viewtopic.php?p=2901066#p2901066

I know you've taken a few stands on that, but they're birds of a feather.

Let me know when you find those alleged multiple stands and explain what your panties are in a twist over.

No PG here, Puss.

 

Huey » 25 Jun 2026, 1:36 pm » wrote: ↑

25 Jun 2026, 1:36 pm

@Blackvegetable  



I know you've taken a few stands on that, 

Wait...he actually took  a stand on something? 

Huey » 25 Jun 2026, 1:36 pm » wrote: ↑

25 Jun 2026, 1:36 pm

@Blackvegetable  

Here are your words:

No, because you made this comment:

viewtopic.php?p=2901066#p2901066

I know you've taken a few stands on that, but they're birds of a feather.

Let me know when you find those alleged multiple stands and explain what your panties are in a twist over.

No PG here, Puss.

You have yet to post your stand, Puss...


 

Vegas » 25 Jun 2026, 12:49 pm » wrote: ↑

25 Jun 2026, 12:49 pm

@Blackvegetable   You can't hide here coward. 

@Huey  

not sure he can do that. In order to do that “he” would have to know the definition of “woman”. 
He doesn’t.

viewtopic.php?t=74773&p=2258063&liberal ... 1#p2258063

I have address the question in the title.  Earlier I answered the question in the Op.  I answered your demand to define woman although you seem confused on that definition

https://archive.liberalforum.net/p/171509

He already posted his definition meaning he also doesn’t need woman defined for him. ...

https://archive.liberalforum.net/p/171395

The point being is I don’t need someone to define “woman”: or me. No, what is your definition?

https://archive.liberalforum.net/p/169527

Have you come up with that definition of "woman" yet? ...

https://archive.liberalforum.net/p/87568

No questions. Waiting for your definition of woman. ...

https://archive.liberalforum.net/p/69336

You were asked to give a definition of what a woman is in your own words. You failed. You posted an article about a woman with high tester one levels. You have ran ever since.

viewtopic.php?t=67628&p=2046764&liberal ... d#p2046764

OK....too easy...

2026In a February 2026 interview with CNN, Khelif revealed that she has high levels of testosterone, which she has been reducing under medical supervision; she also indicated her willingness to undergo the mandatory sex verification tests required by the IOC.[11]In a February 2026 interview with L'Équipe, Khelif was asked: "To be clear, you have a female phenotype but possess the SRY gene, an indicator of masculinity", to which she responded: "Yes, and it’s natural. I have female hormones."[82] 

But @*TinyVictim can...and will.


 

Vegas » 25 Jun 2026, 1:47 pm » wrote: ↑

25 Jun 2026, 1:47 pm

Wait...he actually took  a stand on something?

You don't possess the vocabulary.

Blackvegetable » 25 Jun 2026, 3:38 pm » wrote: ↑

25 Jun 2026, 3:38 pm

Huey » 25 Jun 2026, 1:36 pm » wrote: ↑

25 Jun 2026, 1:36 pm

@Blackvegetable  

Here are your words:

No, because you made this comment:

viewtopic.php?p=2901066#p2901066

I know you've taken a few stands on that, but they're birds of a feather.

Let me know when you find those alleged multiple stands and explain what your panties are in a twist over.

No PG here, Puss.

You have yet to post your stand, Puss...


 

 

Come up with your own insults, Too Far.  Now, why do I need to repost something YOU admit you already know?   You Puss, are a liar when you claim I have yet to post my stand.

Fck off, Too Far.  Either make your point about my stand you already or accept your defeat.  .

Huey » 25 Jun 2026, 1:30 pm » wrote: ↑

25 Jun 2026, 1:30 pm

Thanks.

Ok, BV, none of what you posted is different stands on the issue in question.  When you find my stance(s) that you claim to know we can discuss it.

If it is different from what has been posted to date, show me..


The only one I haven't found is where you declare it stupid to ask anyone to define Woman.
 

Huey » 25 Jun 2026, 3:48 pm » wrote: ↑

25 Jun 2026, 3:48 pm

Come up with your own insults, 

Just post your stand, Quimmie...or I'll ask you to tell me when you came up with "psychostalker"

Blackvegetable » 25 Jun 2026, 3:43 pm » wrote: ↑

25 Jun 2026, 3:43 pm

You don't possess the vocabulary.

Clearly you don't either, since you don't post your stances to anybody. 

Blackvegetable » 25 Jun 2026, 3:49 pm » wrote: ↑

25 Jun 2026, 3:49 pm

Just post your stand, Quimmie...

You first. 
 

Vegas
Clearly you don't either, 

The provided text has a reading level consistent with College Graduate or Post-Graduate (Grade 16+).   

The analysis is dense and intellectually demanding, requiring a sophisticated vocabulary and the ability to navigate complex social and historical subtexts.    

Flesch-Kincaid Grade Level: Estimated at 14–16+. The text uses lengthy, multi-clause sentences (e.g., the 50-word opening sentence) and advanced vocabulary like "cavil," "iconography," "risible," and "twixt".   

Flesch Reading Ease: Estimated between 10–30 (Very Difficult). This score is typical for academic or technical papers and is best understood by university graduates. 


Are you a "university graduate"? 

Vegas » 25 Jun 2026, 3:59 pm » wrote: ↑

25 Jun 2026, 3:59 pm

You first.

Welshy, please...

Blackvegetable » 25 Jun 2026, 4:02 pm » wrote: ↑

25 Jun 2026, 4:02 pm

The provided text has a reading level consistent with College Graduate or Post-Graduate (Grade 16+).   

The analysis is dense and intellectually demanding, requiring a sophisticated vocabulary and the ability to navigate complex social and historical subtexts.    

Flesch-Kincaid Grade Level: Estimated at 14–16+. The text uses lengthy, multi-clause sentences (e.g., the 50-word opening sentence) and advanced vocabulary like "cavil," "iconography," "risible," and "twixt".   

Flesch Reading Ease: Estimated between 10–30 (Very Difficult). This score is typical for academic or technical papers and is best understood by university graduates. 

Are you a "university graduate"?

Debunked by  Exhibit E and Exhibit F

A Time-Saving Thread for Blackvegetable

You are the slowest learner I have ever encountered. 

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=PHhyPttsGsk
 
 

Blackvegetable » 25 Jun 2026, 3:49 pm » wrote: ↑

25 Jun 2026, 3:49 pm

Just post your stand, Quimmie...or I'll ask you to tell me when you came up with "psychostalker"

Thart’s your job, puss.  You have admitted I have posted it.  

No need for me to do it again.

Blackvegetable » 25 Jun 2026, 4:02 pm » wrote: ↑

25 Jun 2026, 4:02 pm

Welshy, please...

Speaking of you always welshing, check this out:

Challenge. 

Huey » 25 Jun 2026, 4:05 pm » wrote: ↑

25 Jun 2026, 4:05 pm

Thart’s your job, puss.  You have admitted I have posted it.  

No need for me to do it again.

It's not my job to post YOUR stand, Tiny...

How do we know it isn't among the two posted and the third I can't locate?

Vegas » 25 Jun 2026, 4:05 pm » wrote: ↑

25 Jun 2026, 4:05 pm

Speaking of you always welshing, check this out:

Challenge.

Are you a college graduate?
 

Blackvegetable » 25 Jun 2026, 4:09 pm » wrote: ↑

25 Jun 2026, 4:09 pm

Ate you a college graduate?

This again? If I was a 6th grade drop out, then I would still have more bragging rights than a loser who has a degree in 19th century Russian Studies, and can't comprehend basic logical fallacies, such as Survivorship bias (or even the word bias) and shifting the burden of proof.