Liberal Forum

The Supreme Court on Monday delivered a humiliating blow to President Donald Trump when it rejected his push to throw out a jury’s finding that the president sexually abused writer E. Jean Carroll.



The president, 80, has been demanding that the findings that led to the $5 million civil verdict be tossed, but the country’s highest court declined to take up the case in an unexplained order.


Nailed, and stapled shut.



:die:  
 

Blackvegetable » 29 Jun 2026, 9:42 am » wrote: ↑

29 Jun 2026, 9:42 am

The Supreme Court on Monday delivered a humiliating blow to President Donald Trump when it rejected his push to throw out a jury’s finding that the president sexually abused writer E. Jean Carroll.

The president, 80, has been demanding that the findings that led to the $5 million civil verdict be tossed, but the country’s highest court declined to take up the case in an unexplained order.

Nailed, and stapled shut.

5 Million is chump change for him.
 

JohnnyYou » 29 Jun 2026, 9:45 am » wrote: ↑

29 Jun 2026, 9:45 am

5 Million is chump change for him.

The money is not the point....



 

Blackvegetable » 29 Jun 2026, 9:56 am » wrote: ↑

29 Jun 2026, 9:56 am

The money is not the point....

Agreed.. but it might make the point go away..

Did you see JD Vance shrug off Nixon's saga would be  little more than a 12 hour news cycle today?

He's got a valid point.  Except he blew any integrity they had to the bottom of the sea in the process.
 
 

JohnnyYou » 29 Jun 2026, 9:58 am » wrote: ↑

29 Jun 2026, 9:58 am

Agreed.. but it might make the point go away..

Did you see JD Vance shrug off Nixon's saga would be  little more than a 12 hour news cycle today?

He's got a valid point.  Except he blew any integrity they had to the bottom of the sea in the process.

Had SCOTUS ruled in his favor, it would have wiped not only the money, but also the jury's rationale.
 

Blackvegetable » 29 Jun 2026, 10:00 am » wrote: ↑

29 Jun 2026, 10:00 am

Had SCOTUS ruled in his favor, it would have wiped not only the money, but also the jury's rationale.

Hopefully the gang of five still has some shred of common sense...  They sure don't seem to understand their jobs very well.
 
Is this a headline today?

Xieshh..  I had to dig..

https://www.nytimes.com/2026/06/29/us/p ... sault.html

Blackvegetable » 29 Jun 2026, 10:00 am » wrote: ↑

29 Jun 2026, 10:00 am

Had SCOTUS ruled in his favor, it would have wiped not only the money, but also the jury's rationale.

of NOT convicting him of rape…we knew that already, ****…
 

Blackvegetable » 29 Jun 2026, 10:00 am » wrote: ↑

29 Jun 2026, 10:00 am

Had SCOTUS ruled in his favor, it would have wiped not only the money, but also the jury's rationale.

The rationale of passing legislation, ex post facto...
is far more damning than the alleged rape of a woman who's made dozens of complaints in her tainted history. Whores are a dime a dozen, we expect more from our elected representatives.....at least a dollar per thrust, Buckchaff.

Blackvegetable » 29 Jun 2026, 9:42 am » wrote: ↑

29 Jun 2026, 9:42 am

The Supreme Court on Monday delivered a humiliating blow to President Donald Trump when it rejected his push to throw out a jury’s finding that the president sexually abused writer E. Jean Carroll.



The president, 80, has been demanding that the findings that led to the $5 million civil verdict be tossed, but the country’s highest court declined to take up the case in an unexplained order.


Nailed, and stapled shut.



 
 

 

Oh, you mean he didn't rape her?
 

Huey » 29 Jun 2026, 10:30 am » wrote: ↑

29 Jun 2026, 10:30 am

Oh, you mean he didn't rape her?

No one can possibly be this **** impervious.

Judge clarifies: Yes, Trump was found to have raped E. Jean Carroll






 

RebelGator » 29 Jun 2026, 10:28 am » wrote: ↑

29 Jun 2026, 10:28 am

The rationale of passing legislation, ex post facto...
is far more damning than the alleged rape of a woman who's made dozens of complaints in her tainted history. Whores are a dime a dozen, we expect more from our elected representatives.....at least a dollar per thrust, Buckchaff.

Did you share this with SCOTUS?

ROG62 » 29 Jun 2026, 10:28 am » wrote: ↑

29 Jun 2026, 10:28 am

of NOT convicting him of rape…we knew that already, ****…

No one can be this **** stupid...

Judge clarifies: Yes, Trump was found to have raped E. Jean Carroll
 

Blackvegetable » 29 Jun 2026, 10:35 am » wrote: ↑

29 Jun 2026, 10:35 am

Did you share this with SCOTUS?

Just give me Kaplan's number, I know you have it on speed dial.
 

RebelGator » 29 Jun 2026, 10:37 am » wrote: ↑

29 Jun 2026, 10:37 am

Just give me Kaplan's number, I know you have it on speed dial.

Now that he's been upheld...


Again.
 

Blackvegetable » 29 Jun 2026, 9:42 am » wrote: ↑

29 Jun 2026, 9:42 am

The Supreme Court on Monday delivered a humiliating blow to President Donald Trump when it rejected his push to throw out a jury’s finding that the president sexually abused writer E. Jean Carroll.

The president, 80, has been demanding that the findings that led to the $5 million civil verdict be tossed, but the country’s highest court declined to take up the case in an unexplained order.

Nailed, and stapled shut.

“The American People stand with President Trump as they demand an immediate end to all of the Witch Hunts, including the Democrat-funded travesty of the Carroll Hoaxes. President Trump will keep winning against Liberal Lawfare, as he continues to focus on his mission to Make America Great Again,” the spokesman said in a statement.

Blackvegetable » 29 Jun 2026, 9:56 am » wrote: ↑

29 Jun 2026, 9:56 am

The money is not the point....

If  money is matter..  I am in the forty poorth universe.

https://youtu.be/cS06eprlj2I?si=GnoXyBKv19BQNkfR
 

Blackvegetable » 29 Jun 2026, 9:42 am » wrote: ↑

29 Jun 2026, 9:42 am

The Supreme Court on Monday delivered a humiliating blow to President Donald Trump when it rejected his push to throw out a jury’s finding that the president sexually abused writer E. Jean Carroll.

The president, 80, has been demanding that the findings that led to the $5 million civil verdict be tossed, but the country’s highest court declined to take up the case in an unexplained order.

Nailed, and stapled shut.

ROTFLMAO...

The LGBTP Dickhead found a morsel....to feed his terminal TDS condition

meanwhile SCOTUS is gutting the party the LGBTP Dickhead supports

that's what TDS does to the small mind of a LGBTP Dickhead like BV...

nothing else in life matters other than the crazed obsession to "Get Trump Now!!"

in the end you got nothing but a loser in denial

nefarious101 » 29 Jun 2026, 11:27 am » wrote: ↑

29 Jun 2026, 11:27 am

ROTFLMAO...

The LGBTP Dickhead found a morsel....to feed his terminal TDS condition

meanwhile SCOTUS is gutting the party the LGBTP Dickhead supports

that's what TDS does to the small mind of a LGBTP Dickhead like BV...

nothing else in life matters other than the crazed obsession to "Get Trump Now!!"

in the end you got nothing but a loser in denial

There were like 8 decisions...   5 went OUR Way..  3 went YOUrs..
 

Blackvegetable » 29 Jun 2026, 10:35 am » wrote: ↑

29 Jun 2026, 10:35 am

No one can possibly be this **** impervious.

Judge clarifies: Yes, Trump was found to have raped E. Jean Carroll

Not what your OP says:

The Supreme Court on Monday delivered a humiliating blow to President Donald Trump when it rejected his push to throw out a jury’s finding that the president sexually abused writer E. Jean Carroll

You lose.

Huey » 29 Jun 2026, 11:44 am » wrote: ↑

29 Jun 2026, 11:44 am

Not what your OP says:

The Supreme Court on Monday delivered a humiliating blow to President Donald Trump when it rejected his push to throw out a jury’s finding that the president sexually abused writer E. Jean Carroll

You lose.

Does E. JEAN consider it sexual abuse.... only if one stops short of rape?

Asking for my friend, Eggplant.....he wants to get to the bottom of Kaplan's panty raid.