Uhhhh....no....I've gone over this in detail.
NOT ME with the mental illness beyond curable, cupcake!!Blackvegetable » 30 Jun 2026, 10:03 am » wrote: ↑ Not once....with good reason.
Your assertions carry no weight.
Because you are a moron
It very much is
Show me the proof.
brown, everyone knows how you use AI to fit your narrative…take the L…
JuCo 5 percenter...72
“Show me the man and I’ll find you the crime” ~ LAVRENTIY BERIA
"Try to get past your passionate ignorance and learn to accept what actually happened." ~ brown's unheeded words of wisdom wow, brown, you’re a real rocket scientist…Blackvegetable » 29 Jun 2026, 6:35 pm » wrote: ↑ Braindead douchebag,
SCOTUS declining to hear actially upholds the federal appellate decision stayed by agreement with the plaintiff so Grifty could run to SCOTUS....and be rebuffed.
People as miserably informed as you should keep their fee fees to themselves.
JuCo 5 percenter...72
“Show me the man and I’ll find you the crime” ~ LAVRENTIY BERIA
"Try to get past your passionate ignorance and learn to accept what actually happened." ~ brown's unheeded words of wisdom Their legal team…
JuCo 5 percenter...72
“Show me the man and I’ll find you the crime” ~ LAVRENTIY BERIA
"Try to get past your passionate ignorance and learn to accept what actually happened." ~ brown's unheeded words of wisdom You are, obviously…
JuCo 5 percenter...72
“Show me the man and I’ll find you the crime” ~ LAVRENTIY BERIA
"Try to get past your passionate ignorance and learn to accept what actually happened." ~ brown's unheeded words of wisdom What was that decision, JuCo?
That's not proof...
Uhhhh...yes. YOU have not gone over ****. Your sources have, then you demanded everyone else to answer your questions.
I show you and you kill yourself.Vegas » 30 Jun 2026, 12:42 pm » wrote: ↑ Uhhhh...yes. YOU have not gone over ****. Your sources have, then you demanded everyone else to answer your questions.
Define "stalking", or staple your coward flaps shut...Vegas » 30 Jun 2026, 12:54 pm » wrote: ↑ Sure. Whatever.
But show the post's content. I don't trust you with your links. God only knows what stalking you decide to do.
They found him liable for the act alleged. That act is broadly defined as Rape. It is the reason they awarded a multiple of the amount usually seen in cases of Sexual Assault. You should read the court record.Vegas » 30 Jun 2026, 12:54 pm » wrote: ↑ Sure. Whatever.
But show the post's content. I don't trust you with your links. God only knows what stalking you decide to do.
Blackvegetable » 30 Jun 2026, 12:56 pm » wrote: ↑ Define "stalking", or staple your coward flaps shut...
Blackvegetable » 30 Jun 2026, 1:23 pm » wrote: ↑ They found him liable for the act alleged. That act is broadly defined as Rape. It is the reason they awarded a multiple of the amount usually seen in cases of Sexual Assault. You should read the court record.