Liberal Forum

jerrab » 22 minutes ago » wrote: ↑

22 minutes ago

https://newrepublic.com/article/212575/ ... itizenship

Why do you **** loony liberals think it is right that a woman can come to this country for the sole purpose of **** out a kid just to make him a citizen and then go back to their country and teach the little **** to hate America and to take advantage of our welfare system for his entire family?
Roberts pulled another one of his stupid maverick rulings out of his *** and convinced Barrett to join him. Read the history of the 14th amendment - it could not be more clear that it did not include foreigners!!!
Simple solution - - do not allow pregnant foreign women into this country.

Buffalo » 37 minutes ago » wrote: ↑

37 minutes ago

That (annotation) is only an interpretation of the Constitution.  Rep. Ogles Anchors Away Act will remedy that ****!!!

------------//////xxxxxxxAll persons born or naturalized in the United States, and subject to the jurisdiction thereof, are citizens of the United States and of the State wherein they reside. No State shall make or enforce any law which shall abridge the privileges or immunities of citizens of the United States; nor shall any State deprive any person of life, liberty, or property, without due process of law; nor deny to any person within its jurisdiction the equal protection of the laws.Based on the first sentence of Section 1, the Court has held that a child born in the United States of Chinese parents who were ineligible to be naturalized themselves is nevertheless a citizen of the United States entitled to all the rights and privileges of citizenship.1 The requirement that a person be subject to the jurisdiction thereof, however, excludes its application to children born of diplomatic representatives of a foreign state, children born of alien enemies in hostile occupation,2 or children of members of Indian tribes subject to tribal laws.3 In addition, the citizenship of children born on vessels in United States territorial waters or on the high seas has generally been held by the lower courts to be determined by the citizenship of the parents.4 Citizens of the United States within the meaning of this Amendment must be natural and not artificial persons; a corporate body is not a citizen of the United States.5

Buffalo » 19 minutes ago » wrote: ↑

19 minutes ago

Why do you **** loony liberals think it is right that a woman can come to this country for the sole purpose of **** out a kid just to make him a citizen and then go back to their country and teach the little **** to hate America and to take advantage of our welfare system for his entire family?
Roberts pulled another one of his stupid maverick rulings out of his *** and convinced Barrett to join him. Read the history of the 14th amendment - it could not be more clear that it did not include foreigners!!!
Simple solution - - do not allow pregnant foreign women into this country.

why do you loony tunes think trump can change the constitution?

Buffalo » 19 minutes ago » wrote: ↑

19 minutes ago

Why do you **** loony liberals think it is right that a woman can come to this country for the sole purpose of **** out a kid just to make him a citizen and then go back to their country and teach the little **** to hate America and to take advantage of our welfare system for his entire family?
Roberts pulled another one of his stupid maverick rulings out of his *** and convinced Barrett to join him. Read the history of the 14th amendment - it could not be more clear that it did not include foreigners!!!
Simple solution - - do not allow pregnant foreign women into this country.

https://constitution.congress.gov/const ... ndment-14/

Buffalo » 37 minutes ago » wrote: ↑

37 minutes ago

That (annotation) is only an interpretation of the Constitution.  Rep. Ogles Anchors Away Act will remedy that ****!!!

https://constitution.congress.gov/const ... ndment-14/

jerrab » Yesterday, 6:27 pm » wrote: ↑

Yesterday, 6:27 pm

Both.

who cares?....you don't matter in the first world....it ours...not yours

Huey » Today, 9:23 am » wrote: ↑

Today, 9:23 am

Those smarter than me on these issues argue that someone here on vacation, never mind to give birth solely for citizenship, is not subject to the jurisdiction of the US and are citizens of any State.  They are subject to the jurisdiction of their home country.

It is not forced on people. Just like if someone is born in australia can claim us citizenship if one theirr parents is a US citizen

Huey » Today, 9:23 am » wrote: ↑

Today, 9:23 am

Those smarter than me on these issues argue that someone here on vacation, never mind to give birth solely for citizenship, is not subject to the jurisdiction of the US and are not citizens of any State.  They are subject to the jurisdiction of their home country.

///////While the Constitution explicitly addresses soil-based citizenship, the U.S. Congress is responsible for passing laws—such as the Child Citizenship Act—that grant automatic citizenship to children born outside the United States if at least one parent is a U.S. citizen

jerrab » 7 minutes ago » wrote: ↑

7 minutes ago

It is not forced on people. Just like if someone is born in australia can claim us citizenship if one theirr parents is a US citizen

 

if one theirr parents is a US citizen

No, it is not like that.  

nefarious101 » 38 minutes ago » wrote: ↑

38 minutes ago

who cares?....you don't matter in the first world....it ours...not yours

Don't respond

Huey » 4 minutes ago » wrote: ↑

4 minutes ago

No, it is not like that.

how so?

Confusing so states can allow a boy who is acting as a girl on girl team and in girls locker room?

jerrab » 4 minutes ago » wrote: ↑

4 minutes ago

///////While the Constitution explicitly addresses soil-based citizenship, the U.S. Congress is responsible for passing laws—such as the Child Citizenship Act—that grant automatic citizenship to children born outside the United States if at least one parent is a U.S. citizen

 

That is not at issue.

jerrab » 3 minutes ago » wrote: ↑

3 minutes ago

how so?

Because one of the parents is already a citizen.
 

Huey » 30 minutes ago » wrote: ↑

30 minutes ago

Because one of the parents is already a citizen.

I was replying to this//////////

Huey » Today, 8:23 am » wrote: ↑
Today, 8:23 am
Those smarter than me on these issues argue that someone here on vacation, never mind to give birth solely for citizenship, is not subject to the jurisdiction of the US and are not citizens of any State.  They are subject to the jurisdiction of their home country.

jerrab » 6 minutes ago » wrote: ↑

6 minutes ago

I was replying to this//////////

Huey » Today, 8:23 am » wrote: ↑
Today, 8:23 am
Those smarter than me on these issues argue that someone here on vacation, never mind to give birth solely for citizenship, is not subject to the jurisdiction of the US and are not citizens of any State.  They are subject to the jurisdiction of their home country.

 

I am sure you were
 

jerrab » 59 minutes ago » wrote: ↑

59 minutes ago

Don't respond

You're a babbling third world idiot....

you're opinion is worthless in the first world

nefarious101 » 23 minutes ago » wrote: ↑

23 minutes ago

You're a babbling third world idiot....

you're opinion is worthless in the first world

Don't respond and.....





                                           

Huey » Today, 9:23 am » wrote: ↑

Today, 9:23 am

Those smarter than me on these issues argue that someone here on vacation, never mind to give birth solely for citizenship, is not subject to the jurisdiction of the US and are not citizens of any State.  They are subject to the jurisdiction of their home country.

////////Yes, a baby born in America to French parents (or any foreign nationals) automatically acquires U.S. citizenship at birth. The United States grants birthright citizenship to almost everyone born on its soil (under the 14th Amendment), regardless of the parents' nationality or immigration status

Huey » Today, 9:23 am » wrote: ↑

Today, 9:23 am

Those smarter than me on these issues argue that someone here on vacation, never mind to give birth solely for citizenship, is not subject to the jurisdiction of the US and are not citizens of any State.  They are subject to the jurisdiction of their home country.

Xxxxxxxxxxxxx

. French Citizenship by Descent
Your baby is also automatically a French citizen from birth if at least one parent is a French citizen. You can officially register the child's birth with the French government to obtain a French passport and an official French livret de famille. [1, 2, 3, 4]

3. Dual Citizenship
Both the United States and France allow dual citizenship. Your child can hold both passports and legally maintain dual nationality indefinitely. [1, 3]