Liberal Forum

Squatchman » 56 minutes ago » wrote: ↑

56 minutes ago

  What rules?
It's no holds barred.
Nobody cares about some stinking rule here.
Just keep doing what you're doing.

You get them to say enough stupid ****, then you beat them with their own words.


They'll never disappoint. 
 

Blackvegetable » 51 minutes ago » wrote: ↑

51 minutes ago

You get them to say enough stupid ****, then you beat them with their own words.

They'll never disappoint.

Prove it. 

Blackvegetable » Today, 12:17 pm » wrote: ↑

Today, 12:17 pm

You get them to say enough stupid ****, then you beat them with their own words.

They'll never disappoint.

ROG62 » 25 minutes ago » wrote: ↑

25 minutes ago

It usually follows "#"

Vegas » Today, 12:19 pm » wrote: ↑

Today, 12:19 pm

Prove it.

Lol. No stupid ***. Here, let me narrow it down for you. Whatever your stupid liberal sources say ie...CNN, MSNBC, and your brainless legtwing blogs you love, if you take the complete opposite of what they tell you to think, then you will find the truth about Trump. 

Blackvegetable » Today, 8:44 am » wrote: ↑

Today, 8:44 am

“Then he started saying, ‘The windmills are killing your birds. The birds are falling around the windmills, and the foxes are eating those birds,’” McSweeney recalled Trump telling Starmer.   

Trump apparently went on to claim that the foxes had become lazy after feeding on the birds and had grown so overweight that “people no longer knew what kind of creature they were because they were too fat.”

https://www.thedailybeast.com/donald-tr ... -revealed/

I think the fact that he is, quite possibly, the Stupidest Man Alive is why our MAGAts are reluctant to credit him.

….how stupid can he actually be when he (Trump) is all you can think about, and he didn’t spend a nickel.  It’s the “art of the deal” thingy, and you’re the one left out in the cold.

….get therapy.
 

Blackvegetable » 23 minutes ago » wrote: ↑

23 minutes ago

Lol. No stupid ***. Here, let me narrow it down for you. Whatever your stupid liberal sources say ie...CNN, MSNBC, and your brainless legtwing blogs you love, if you take the complete opposite of what they tell you to think, then you will find the truth about Trump. 

Still can't debunk it.



1. Continue to lie claiming it was debunked...but still no evidence. 

Blackvegetable » 29 minutes ago » wrote: ↑

29 minutes ago

It usually follows "#"

             
JuCo is a dumb mother **** 
 

jefftec » Today, 6:16 pm » wrote: ↑

Today, 6:16 pm

….how stupid can he actually be when he (Trump) is all you can think about, and he didn’t spend a nickel.  It’s the “art of the deal” thingy, and you’re the one left out in the cold.

….get therapy.

Thanks for reminding us who the real victim is here...

Vegas » Today, 6:22 pm » wrote: ↑

Today, 6:22 pm

Still can't debunk it.

1. Continue to lie claiming it was debunked...but still no evidence.

Left entirely demoralized....

jefftec » Today, 6:16 pm » wrote: ↑

Today, 6:16 pm

….how stupid can he actually be when he (Trump) is all you can think about, and he didn’t spend a nickel.  It’s the “art of the deal” thingy, and you’re the one left out in the cold.

….get therapy.

He will be the worst POTUS  ever for a very long time...

Blackvegetable » Today, 9:33 am » wrote: ↑

Today, 9:33 am

Where are all the **** to stand in defense of ****?

You fluffed a cock-gobbler,  does it get any lower?

Squatchman » Today, 12:12 pm » wrote: ↑

Today, 12:12 pm

  What rules?
It's no holds barred.
Nobody cares about some stinking rule here.
Just keep doing what you're doing.

Making an *** of himself?

Move over.
 

Blackvegetable » Today, 7:21 pm » wrote: ↑

Today, 7:21 pm

Left entirely demoralized....

Yes, I left you entirely demoralized. Well done in finally coming to terms with that.

Now, you just need to come to terms with me demoralizing you here also:

A Time-Saving Thread for Blackvegetable
 

Vegas » Yesterday, 9:47 pm » wrote: ↑

Yesterday, 9:47 pm

Yes, I left you entirely demoralized. Well done in finally coming to terms with that.

Now, you just need to come to terms with me demoralizing you here also:

A Time-Saving Thread for Blackvegetable

Come to terms with



The provided text has a reading level consistent with College Graduate or Post-Graduate (Grade 16+). The analysis is dense and intellectually demanding, requiring a sophisticated vocabulary and the ability to navigate complex social and historical subtexts.   

   Define "subtext"... ...
 

Blackvegetable » Today, 4:55 am » wrote: ↑

Today, 4:55 am

Come to terms with

The provided text has a reading level consistent with College Graduate or Post-Graduate (Grade 16+). The analysis is dense and intellectually demanding, requiring a sophisticated vocabulary and the ability to navigate complex social and historical subtexts.   

   Define "subtext"... ...

Already have. It was debunked. Come to terms with this...and define your own ****: 

A Time-Saving Thread for Blackvegetable
 
I still don't see your text. We both know why.

Blackvegetable » Today, 4:55 am » wrote: ↑

Today, 4:55 am

Come to terms with

The provided text has a reading level consistent with College Graduate or Post-Graduate (Grade 16+). The analysis is dense and intellectually demanding, requiring a sophisticated vocabulary and the ability to navigate complex social and historical subtexts.   

   Define "subtext"... ...

Your memory is shorter than your pecker....where's Jackie?

Vegas » 43 minutes ago » wrote: ↑

43 minutes ago

Already have. It was debunked. Come to terms with this...and define your own ****: 

A Time-Saving Thread for Blackvegetable
 
I still don't see your text. We both know why.

your "debunking" has been debunked.


I don't see your definition of "subtext"

 

Blackvegetable » 2 minutes ago » wrote: ↑

2 minutes ago

your "debunking" has been debunked.

I don't see your definition of "subtext"

No evidence of your debunking. Yet, I showed the evidence of mine.

Define your own ****. Your point, your job. 

Still don't see your text.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_yS7oPmFcfM


 

Vegas » 25 minutes ago » wrote: ↑

25 minutes ago

No evidence of your debunking. Yet, I showed the evidence of mine.

Define your own ****. Your point, your job. 


 

No, you haven't. 

My point is that you have no idea what "subtext" means..

QED