Liberal Forum

RebelGator » Yesterday, 6:40 am » wrote: ↑

Yesterday, 6:40 am

We define gullible fool's like you, as hoax bait.

Hook, line, and sinker.

they want to peanut you.....it's their little censorship game

Huey » 06 Jul 2026, 6:27 am » wrote: ↑

06 Jul 2026, 6:27 am

Odd, on one day you say disregard the thread title, 

Dim little twat,


Post the thread title.

Blackvegetable » 12 minutes ago » wrote: ↑

12 minutes ago

Dim little twat,


Post the thread title.

 

Odd, on one day you say disregard the thread title, on others you say disregard the words in the OP.  Make up your mind, Puss.

Huey » 06 Jul 2026, 6:45 am » wrote: ↑

06 Jul 2026, 6:45 am

Odd, on one day you say disregard the thread title, on others you say disregard the words in the OP.  Make up your mind, Puss.

one minute you bitch about "staying on topic", the next minute you repeatedly decline to post the topic.


But I bet you consider that "one stand"..

Blackvegetable » 6 minutes ago » wrote: ↑

6 minutes ago

one minute you bitch about "staying on topic", the next minute you repeatedly decline to post the topic.


But I bet you consider that "one stand"..

 

https://www.washingtonpost.com/educatio ... oure-next/

Conservatives seek blue-state bans on trans athletes in wake of Supreme Court win
 

Huey » 06 Jul 2026, 6:54 am » wrote: ↑

06 Jul 2026, 6:54 am

https://www.washingtonpost.com/educatio ... oure-next/

Conservatives seek blue-state bans on trans athletes in wake of Supreme Court win

Post the thread title

Blackvegetable » 5 minutes ago » wrote: ↑

5 minutes ago

Post the thread title

 

Every time I reply the thread title is posted.  Plus, in the future, I recommend you tell us if the thread title is more important than the OP.  You are not consistent. 

Huey » 06 Jul 2026, 7:03 am » wrote: ↑

06 Jul 2026, 7:03 am

Every time I reply the thread title is posted.  Plus, in the future, I recommend 

Just post the thread title...

Blackvegetable » 4 minutes ago » wrote: ↑

4 minutes ago

Just post the thread title...

 

, posted again.  You are not happy about this:

https://www.washingtonpost.com/educatio ... oure-next/

Conservatives seek blue-state bans on trans athletes in wake of Supreme Court win

That is from your OP.

Huey » 06 Jul 2026, 7:14 am » wrote: ↑

06 Jul 2026, 7:14 am

Oops, posted again.  

TinyCoward,


Don't be such a coward...

Blackvegetable » 7 minutes ago » wrote: ↑

7 minutes ago

TinyCoward,


Don't be such a coward...

 

And posted again.

https://www.washingtonpost.com/educatio ... oure-next/

Conservatives seek blue-state bans on trans athletes in wake of Supreme Court win

That is in your OP.  Are you not happy about that?

Huey » 06 Jul 2026, 7:27 am » wrote: ↑

06 Jul 2026, 7:27 am

And posted again.


 

Why your "pledge" is worthless..

Post the thread title.

Blackvegetable » 15 minutes ago » wrote: ↑

15 minutes ago

Why your "pledge" is worthless..

Post the thread title.

 

I haven't taken the pledge yet because you haven't.  Once you do you can say it is worthless.  You are too much a ******.

This is in your OP:

https://www.washingtonpost.com/educatio ... oure-next/

Conservatives seek blue-state bans on trans athletes in wake of Supreme Court win

Huey » 06 Jul 2026, 7:51 am » wrote: ↑

06 Jul 2026, 7:51 am

I haven't taken the pledge yet because you haven't.  

This gets increasingly stupid.

In that case, why should I?

Blackvegetable » 10 minutes ago » wrote: ↑

10 minutes ago

This gets increasingly stupid.

In that case, why should I?

 

No, the pledge is not to just answer any question you ask.  The pledge is to answer questions on a one for one basis.  Are you gonna do so?  If yo you are not going to answer on a one for one for basis I am not going to.

I pledge publicly to answer BLS questions on a one for one Basis with one stipulation.  The questions must be on the topic under discussion.  Not necessarily the thread topic but discussion that break out aside from them as well

Examples:

If discussing Obamacare, Joe Biden, Policy etc and you ask "Why didn't you vote for Trump a third time" it won't be answered.

If the discussion is about Cup Drivers being athletic and suddenly pivot to "Why did you stop watching the NFL" it won't be answered.

And remember, if you scoff at that stipulation that means contrary to what you said to me yesterday YOU are unable to discuss issues.  There you have is.  A public pledge.  Your turn.

viewtopic.php?p=2859453#p2859453

Huey » 06 Jul 2026, 8:09 am » wrote: ↑

06 Jul 2026, 8:09 am

No, the pledge is not to just answer any question you ask.  The pledge is to answer questions on a one for one basis.  

Focus...

If you won't take your own pledge, why should I?

Blackvegetable » 6 minutes ago » wrote: ↑

6 minutes ago

Focus...

If you won't take your own pledge, why should I?

 

Focus.....I will answer your questions on a one for one basis if you do the same.  Will you be answering on a one for one basis?
 

Blackvegetable » 06 Jul 2026, 5:57 am » wrote: ↑

06 Jul 2026, 5:57 am

Controlly,

You're not getting it.

So shut the **** up.
 

 

Is this part of your OP?

https://www.washingtonpost.com/educatio ... oure-next/

Conservatives seek blue-state bans on trans athletes in wake of Supreme Court win
 

Huey » 06 Jul 2026, 8:55 am » wrote: ↑

06 Jul 2026, 8:55 am

Is this part of your OP?

https://www.washingtonpost.com/educatio ... oure-next/

Conservatives seek blue-state bans on trans athletes in wake of Supreme Court win

Yes...it is...


What do you believe this OP is about?
 

Blackvegetable » 06 Jul 2026, 9:00 am » wrote: ↑

06 Jul 2026, 9:00 am

Yes...it is...


What do you believe this OP is about?
 

 

Part of it is about preserving women's sports.  I spoke about that.