Liberal Forum

Huey » 06 Jul 2026, 9:03 am » wrote: ↑

06 Jul 2026, 9:03 am

Part of it is about preserving women's sports.  I spoke about that.

 .......after which he punched her on the side of the head.

Huey » 06 Jul 2026, 9:03 am » wrote: ↑

06 Jul 2026, 9:03 am

Part of it is about preserving women's sports.  I spoke about that.

No....that's completely wrong. 


Let's start with the thread title....
 

Part of it is about

Why the Pledge has no value at all.

Blackvegetable » 06 Jul 2026, 9:07 am » wrote: ↑

06 Jul 2026, 9:07 am

No....that's completely wrong. 


Let's start with the thread title....
 

 

Are you answering questions on a one for one basis?
 

Huey » 06 Jul 2026, 9:20 am » wrote: ↑

06 Jul 2026, 9:20 am

Are you answering questions on a one for one basis?

We just saw a long string of examples why your pledge is worthless....

It's so worthless that not even you will take it.
 

Blackvegetable » 06 Jul 2026, 9:22 am » wrote: ↑

06 Jul 2026, 9:22 am

We just saw a long string of examples why your pledge is worthless....

It's so worthless that not even you will take it.
 

 

No, the pledge takes two people.  Ok, lets see if you are a man:

.after which he punched her on the side of the head.

Now, in your words, what does the trans ban in women's sports have to do with that?

Balls in your court.
 

Huey » 06 Jul 2026, 9:25 am » wrote: ↑

06 Jul 2026, 9:25 am

No, the pledge takes two people.  Ok, lets see if you are a man:

Now, in your words, what does the trans ban in women's sports have to do with that?

Balls in your court.

You are remarkably stupid..

Answer the question...

If it isn't worth you taking it, why should I?

Now, in your words, what does the trans ban in women's sports have to do with that?

No...that question was to you....after I answered yours...
 

Blackvegetable » 06 Jul 2026, 9:54 am » wrote: ↑

06 Jul 2026, 9:54 am

Huey » 06 Jul 2026, 9:25 am » wrote: ↑

06 Jul 2026, 9:25 am

No, the pledge takes two people.  Ok, lets see if you are a man:

Now, in your words, what does the trans ban in women's sports have to do with that?

Balls in your court.

You are remarkably stupid..

Answer the question...

If it isn't worth you taking it, why should I?

Now, in your words, what does the trans ban in women's sports have to do with that?

No...that question was to you....after I answered yours...
 

 

Looks like you just failed. You aked me to post the thread title.  I did.  You failed to answer the question put to you.  

Try again.

Blackvegetable » 06 Jul 2026, 9:00 am » wrote: ↑

06 Jul 2026, 9:00 am

Huey » 06 Jul 2026, 8:55 am » wrote: ↑

06 Jul 2026, 8:55 am

Is this part of your OP?

https://www.washingtonpost.com/educatio ... oure-next/

Conservatives seek blue-state bans on trans athletes in wake of Supreme Court win

Yes...it is...


What do you believe this OP is about?
 

 

 

Huey » 06 Jul 2026, 9:03 am » wrote: ↑

06 Jul 2026, 9:03 am

Blackvegetable » 06 Jul 2026, 9:00 am » wrote: ↑

06 Jul 2026, 9:00 am

Yes...it is...


What do you believe this OP is about?
 


 

Part of it is about preserving women's sports.  I spoke about that. 

 

I'm waiting for the answer to this...


You will note the question mark, denoting a question. 
 

Blackvegetable » 06 Jul 2026, 10:18 am » wrote: ↑

06 Jul 2026, 10:18 am

 


I'm waiting for the answer to this...


You will note the question mark, denoting a question. 
 

 

What do you believe this OP is about?

Since you didn't really specify I would have to guess that you are trying to show hypocrisy on Trump's part concerning his alleged treatment of women.

Your turn:

Now, in your words, what does the trans ban in women's sports have to do with the thread title I posted?

 

Blackvegetable » Today, 6:27 am » wrote: ↑

Today, 6:27 am

post the thread title...

Post it yourself. **** your demands. Always demanding every one to do your job. 

**** retard.

Blackvegetable » Today, 5:00 am » wrote: ↑

Today, 5:00 am

Nothing there.

Post the text.

You don't see anything. Your illiteracy is not my problem. 

Exhibit H: Utterly destroyed. There are so many exhibits now, that it spilled over to another post on the thread.
A Time-Saving Thread for Blackvegetable
 

Huey » 06 Jul 2026, 10:22 am » wrote: ↑

06 Jul 2026, 10:22 am

Since you didn't really specify I would have to guess that you are trying to show hypocrisy on Trump's part concerning his alleged treatment of women.

Your turn:

Now, in your words, what does the trans ban in women's sports have to do with the thread title I posted?

Since you didn't really specify I would have to guess that you are trying to show hypocrisy on Trump's part concerning his alleged treatment of women.

 Once you have been found liable for an act defined as "rape", you're no longer "alleged", nor are you considered a baker or a papist.

But it isn't just his hypocrisy....it's hers...literally shaking the hand with which he insists he enjoys license to grab women by the ******.

Then, of course, there's the nauseating hypocrisy of the MAGAts, Fellow Travelers and Toadies of the 2ndBesty...


Nod.

Vegas » 06 Jul 2026, 10:28 am » wrote: ↑

06 Jul 2026, 10:28 am

You don't see anything. Your illiteracy is not my problem. 

Exhibit H: Utterly destroyed. There are so many exhibits now, that it spilled over to another post on the thread.
A Time-Saving Thread for Blackvegetable

Post the text.