Liberal Forum

Talk about coining a phrase....you heard it here first.

This is what separates a thinker from a stinker, Eggplant. 

"There ain't no sin and there ain't no virtue. There's just stuff people do." 
 

Speaking of rapists... the DNC's newest pet is history. His 15 minutes of fame are over and gone. Who knew that running a rapist with an SS tattoo wouldn't end well?

SouthernFried » 08 Jul 2026, 11:27 pm » wrote: ↑

08 Jul 2026, 11:27 pm

Speaking of rapists... the DNC's newest pet is history. His 15 minutes of fame are over and gone. Who knew that running a rapist with an SS tattoo wouldn't end well?

One man's rapist is another man's Democrat. 

SouthernFried » 08 Jul 2026, 11:27 pm » wrote: ↑

08 Jul 2026, 11:27 pm

Speaking of rapists... the DNC's newest pet is history. His 15 minutes of fame are over and gone. Who knew that running a rapist with an SS tattoo wouldn't end well?

wonder if it’s done on purpose so the DNC can circumvent the election process and run who they want…like they did with Biden…

RebelGator » 08 Jul 2026, 11:15 pm » wrote: ↑

08 Jul 2026, 11:15 pm

Talk about coining a phrase....you heard it here first.

This is what separates a thinker from a stinker, Eggplant. 

"There ain't no sin and there ain't no virtue. There's just stuff people do."

https://storage.courtlistener.com/recap ... .212.0.pdf

Trump's next book: The Rips of Grift.

JohnnyYou » 09 Jul 2026, 6:36 am » wrote: ↑

09 Jul 2026, 6:36 am

Trump's next book: The Rips of Grift.

Plagiarism is not limited to dimwits, Johnny.....even Steinbeck was not immune to it.The Battle Hymn of the Republic”: “Mine eyes have seen the glory of the coming of the Lord/He is trampling out the vintage where the grapes of wrath are stored.” 

RebelGator » 09 Jul 2026, 6:48 am » wrote: ↑

09 Jul 2026, 6:48 am

Plagiarism is not limited to dimwits, Johnny.....even Steinbeck was not immune to it.The Battle Hymn of the Republic”: “Mine eyes have seen the glory of the coming of the Lord/He is trampling out the vintage where the grapes of wrath are stored.”

Your teacher hit you a ruler?


 

ROG62 » 09 Jul 2026, 5:52 am » wrote: ↑

09 Jul 2026, 5:52 am

wonder if it’s done on purpose so the DNC can circumvent the election process and run who they want…like they did with Biden…

Possibly. Either way, Platner is a huge piece of **** ****. 

RebelGator » 09 Jul 2026, 6:48 am » wrote: ↑

09 Jul 2026, 6:48 am

Plagiarism is not limited to dimwits, Johnny.....even Steinbeck was not immune to it.The Battle Hymn of the Republic”: “Mine eyes have seen the glory of the coming of the Lord/He is trampling out the vintage where the grapes of wrath are stored.”

That's called "allusion".


It's deliberate...

The Biblical Connection: The phrase originates from the Book of Revelation (14:19-20) in the Bible, where angels harvest the "grapes" of human evil and crush them in the winepress of God's wrath. It serves as a metaphor for impending judgment and justice

Blackvegetable » 09 Jul 2026, 6:29 am » wrote: ↑

09 Jul 2026, 6:29 am

https://storage.courtlistener.com/recap ... .212.0.pdf

You can literally SHUT THE **** UP now…

ROG62 » 09 Jul 2026, 11:04 am » wrote: ↑

09 Jul 2026, 11:04 am

You can literally SHUT THE **** UP now…

But they LOST that argument  

Blackvegetable » 09 Jul 2026, 6:29 am » wrote: ↑

09 Jul 2026, 6:29 am

RebelGator » 08 Jul 2026, 11:15 pm » wrote: ↑

08 Jul 2026, 11:15 pm

Talk about coining a phrase....you heard it here first.

This is what separates a thinker from a stinker, Eggplant. 

"There ain't no sin and there ain't no virtue. There's just stuff people do."

https://storage.courtlistener.com/recap ... .212.0.pdf

 

Dman, your own sources keep **** you over:

The jury’s unanimous verdict in Carroll II was almost entirely in favor of Ms. Carroll. The only point on which Ms. Carroll did not prevail was whether she had proved that Mr. Trump had “raped” her within the narrow, technical meaning of a particular section of the New York Penal Law

Another one bites the dust.

Huey » 09 Jul 2026, 11:38 am » wrote: ↑

09 Jul 2026, 11:38 am

Dman, your own sources keep **** you over:

The jury’s unanimous verdict in Carroll II was almost entirely in favor of Ms. Carroll. The only point on which Ms. Carroll did not prevail was whether she had proved that Mr. Trump had “raped” her within the narrow, technical meaning of a particular section of the New York Penal Law

Another one bites the dust.

Was Grifty subject to criminal penalty had they found otherwise?

Blackvegetable » 09 Jul 2026, 11:48 am » wrote: ↑

09 Jul 2026, 11:48 am

Huey » 09 Jul 2026, 11:38 am » wrote: ↑

09 Jul 2026, 11:38 am

Dman, your own sources keep **** you over:

The jury’s unanimous verdict in Carroll II was almost entirely in favor of Ms. Carroll. The only point on which Ms. Carroll did not prevail was whether she had proved that Mr. Trump had “raped” her within the narrow, technical meaning of a particular section of the New York Penal Law

Another one bites the dust.

Was Grifty subject to criminal penalty had they found otherwise?

 

I posted all I need to post on this topic.  2 from your own sources.  If you have a point to make, make it.  I am not doing your work for you.

 

RebelGator » 08 Jul 2026, 11:15 pm » wrote: ↑

08 Jul 2026, 11:15 pm

This is what separates a thinker from a stinker, Eggplant. 


 

     
 

Huey » 09 Jul 2026, 11:52 am » wrote: ↑

09 Jul 2026, 11:52 am

I posted all I need to post on this topic.  

You haven't answered a single question about the governing objective facts.


You are trying to convince me that Judge Kaplan contradicted himself.....and the jury. 

He didn't...

Blackvegetable » 09 Jul 2026, 12:04 pm » wrote: ↑

09 Jul 2026, 12:04 pm

Huey » 09 Jul 2026, 11:52 am » wrote: ↑

09 Jul 2026, 11:52 am

I posted all I need to post on this topic.  

You haven't answered a single question about the governing objective facts.


You are trying to convince me that Judge Kaplan contradicted himself.....and the jury. 

He didn't...

 

Nope.  You are posting narrative.  You have not posted objective fact like me and Rog. 

Here is an objective fact:

2 of your sources show that the jury did not prove Trumped raped her.  So **** off with your objective fact **** and build a case with factual support and questions.

Again, you are not a lawyer and this is not a courtroom.

Capsicé?
 

Blackvegetable » 09 Jul 2026, 12:04 pm » wrote: ↑

09 Jul 2026, 12:04 pm

You haven't answered a single question about the governing objective facts.

You are trying to convince me that Judge Kaplan contradicted himself.....and the jury. 

He didn't...l

No, he pretty much informed everyone in court that the harlot was violated, even though:

 E. Jean Carroll could not remember four specific time-related details regarding the alleged mid-1990s assault: 

• The exact date
• The month
• The season
• The exact year (she initially fluctuated between 1994 and 1995 before landing on 1996

The poor thing was so traumatized by the violations, she kept getting the 1/2 dozen rapes she had to endure, all mixed up with one another.

 

Huey » 09 Jul 2026, 12:09 pm » wrote: ↑

09 Jul 2026, 12:09 pm

Nope.  You are posting narrative.  You have not posted objective fact like me and Rog. 

Here is an objective fact:

2 of your sources show that the jury did not prove Trumped raped her.  

No...that is not what the finding means...


As Judge Kaplan makes perfectly clear.