Are you still going about Trump and rape?
He did not say that when the verict form was presented. You keep saying the same thing over and over and over but proved no documentation to back it up. Where we are kicking your bitch *** with facts.Blackvegetable » 09 Jul 2026, 12:19 pm » wrote: ↑No...that is not what the finding means...Huey » 09 Jul 2026, 12:09 pm » wrote: ↑ Nope. You are posting narrative. You have not posted objective fact like me and Rog.
Here is an objective fact:
2 of your sources show that the jury did not prove Trumped raped her.
As Judge Kaplan makes perfectly clear.
RebelGator » 09 Jul 2026, 12:17 pm » wrote: ↑No, he pretty much informed everyone in court that the harlot was violated, even though:Blackvegetable » 09 Jul 2026, 12:04 pm » wrote: ↑ You haven't answered a single question about the governing objective facts.
You are trying to convince me that Judge Kaplan contradicted himself.....and the jury.
He didn't...l
E. Jean Carroll could not remember four specific time-related details regarding the alleged mid-1990s assault:The poor thing was so traumatized by the violations, she kept getting the 1/2 dozen rapes she had to endure, all mixed up with one another.
- The exact date
- The month
- The season
- The exact year (she initially fluctuated between 1994 and 1995 before landing on 1996
Yes, we all now the Jury decided she did prove trump raped her. As the Jury Verdict From says.Blackvegetable » 09 Jul 2026, 12:20 pm » wrote: ↑
It was a JURY decision
Huey » 09 Jul 2026, 12:29 pm » wrote: ↑
Yes, we all now the Jury decided she did prove trump raped her. As the Jury Verdict From says.
we all now the Jury decided she did prove trump raped her. As the Jury Verdict From says.
you can read all you want, brown…it’s the comprehension you literally suck at…
JuCo 5 percenter...72
“Show me the man and I’ll find you the crime” ~ LAVRENTIY BERIA
"Try to get past your passionate ignorance and learn to accept what actually happened." ~ brown's unheeded words of wisdom Huey » 09 Jul 2026, 12:29 pm » wrote: ↑RebelGator » 09 Jul 2026, 12:17 pm » wrote: ↑No, he pretty much informed everyone in court that the harlot was violated, even though:Blackvegetable » 09 Jul 2026, 12:04 pm » wrote: ↑ You haven't answered a single question about the governing objective facts.
You are trying to convince me that Judge Kaplan contradicted himself.....and the jury.
He didn't...l
E. Jean Carroll could not remember four specific time-related details regarding the alleged mid-1990s assault:The poor thing was so traumatized by the violations, she kept getting the 1/2 dozen rapes she had to endure, all mixed up with one another.
- The exact date
- The month
- The season
- The exact year (she initially fluctuated between 1994 and 1995 before landing on 1996
Yes, we all now the Jury decided she did prove trump raped her. As the Jury Verdict From says.Blackvegetable » 09 Jul 2026, 12:20 pm » wrote: ↑
It was a JURY decision
No, we don't need to do anymore. WE all know what the boxed checked NO on the Verdict Form means. You are so ****** like you are afraid to admit you are wrong.Blackvegetable » 09 Jul 2026, 2:44 pm » wrote: ↑Huey » 09 Jul 2026, 12:29 pm » wrote: ↑
Yes, we all now the Jury decided she did prove trump raped her. As the Jury Verdict From says.we all now the Jury decided she did prove trump raped her. As the Jury Verdict From says.
"We" need to do some reading
If you want to opine on the matter, you do..
That is not cherry picked.. THAT is a real fact that YOU refuse to acknowledge, Puss. Keep spinning PUSS.Huey » 09 Jul 2026, 11:38 am » wrote: ↑Blackvegetable » 09 Jul 2026, 6:29 am » wrote: ↑https://storage.courtlistener.com/recap ... .212.0.pdfRebelGator » 08 Jul 2026, 11:15 pm » wrote: ↑ Talk about coining a phrase....you heard it here first.
This is what separates a thinker from a stinker, Eggplant.
"There ain't no sin and there ain't no virtue. There's just stuff people do."
Dman, your own sources keep **** you over:
The jury’s unanimous verdict in Carroll II was almost entirely in favor of Ms. Carroll. The only point on which Ms. Carroll did not prevail was whether she had proved that Mr. Trump had “raped” her within the narrow, technical meaning of a particular section of the New York Penal Law
Another one bites the dust.
Blackvegetable » 09 Jul 2026, 3:00 pm » wrote: ↑If you want to opine on the matter, you do..
You aren't free to cherrypick items for your alternative take.
Remember, I can read this stuff...you don't even try.
Huey » 09 Jul 2026, 2:57 pm » wrote: ↑Huey » 09 Jul 2026, 12:29 pm » wrote: ↑RebelGator » 09 Jul 2026, 12:17 pm » wrote: ↑
No, he pretty much informed everyone in court that the harlot was violated, even though:
E. Jean Carroll could not remember four specific time-related details regarding the alleged mid-1990s assault:The poor thing was so traumatized by the violations, she kept getting the 1/2 dozen rapes she had to endure, all mixed up with one another.
- The exact date
- The month
- The season
- The exact year (she initially fluctuated between 1994 and 1995 before landing on 1996
Yes, we all now the Jury decided she did prove trump raped her. As the Jury Verdict From says.
No, we don't need to do anymore. WE all know what the boxed checked NO on the Verdict Form means. You are so ****** like you are afraid to admit you are wrong.Blackvegetable » 09 Jul 2026, 2:44 pm » wrote: ↑Huey » 09 Jul 2026, 12:29 pm » wrote: ↑
Yes, we all now the Jury decided she did prove trump raped her. As the Jury Verdict From says.we all now the Jury decided she did prove trump raped her. As the Jury Verdict From says.
"We" need to do some reading
GTFO of my face with your weak spin, PUSS.
Wrong.Huey » 09 Jul 2026, 3:12 pm » wrote: ↑ @Blackvegetable
A verifiable fact showing no jury has found trump guilty of or liable for rape.
https://www.google.com/url?sa=t&source= ... L3v_zZl87s
Can you explain why the presiding judge would say the exact opposite in responding to Team Grifty?Huey » 09 Jul 2026, 3:12 pm » wrote: ↑ @Blackvegetable
A verifiable fact showing no jury has found trump guilty of or liable for rape.
https://www.google.com/url?sa=t&source= ... L3v_zZl87s
Blackvegetable » 09 Jul 2026, 5:30 pm » wrote: ↑ Can you explain why the presiding judge would say the exact opposite in responding to Team Grifty?
Tell Team Grifty....
Black Veg we farted..
Blackvegetable » 09 Jul 2026, 3:59 pm » wrote: ↑Wrong.Huey » 09 Jul 2026, 3:12 pm » wrote: ↑ @Blackvegetable
A verifiable fact showing no jury has found trump guilty of or liable for rape.
https://www.google.com/url?sa=t&sou ... L3v_zZl87s
I am done kicking your *** over this, Puss.Blackvegetable » 09 Jul 2026, 5:30 pm » wrote: ↑Can you explain why the presiding judge would say the exact opposite in responding to Team Grifty?Huey » 09 Jul 2026, 3:12 pm » wrote: ↑ @Blackvegetable
A verifiable fact showing no jury has found trump guilty of or liable for rape.
https://www.google.com/url?sa=t&sou ... L3v_zZl87s