Blackvegetable » 6 minutes ago » wrote: ↑ Watch "run".
What would have changed had the jury found that Grifty DID rape her according to NY criminal code?
That douche isn't going to change. I say when the douche reframes with this we just ignore his ***. Eventually, he will stop.Beekeeper » 5 minutes ago » wrote: ↑
You left out the VERY BEST PART, cupcake!!
https://www.politico.com/dims4/default/ ... 180432.png
Awwww, PUMPKIN, NO RAPE FOUND TO HAVE HAPPENED!!!
Sucks, huh??
Tell me what you don't getHuey » 4 minutes ago » wrote: ↑ That douche isn't going to change. I say when the douche reframes with this we just ignore his ***. Eventually, he will stop.
You're running..Beekeeper » 4 minutes ago » wrote: ↑ NO **** SPECULATION needed because the JURY FOUND NO RAPE OCCURRED!!
That's why your assertions carry no weight...
Regardless of what anyone says, yes without a doubt.Blackvegetable » Yesterday, 5:41 am » wrote: ↑ Not like this guy
Judge clarifies: Yes, Trump was found to have raped E. Jean Carroll
Blackvegetable » Today, 10:08 am » wrote: ↑Watch "run".Beekeeper » Today, 9:59 am » wrote: ↑ NO JUDGE'S "clarification" changes the FACT that the JURY FOUND NO RAPE HAPPENED!! KAPLAN EVEN SAID THAT WAS WHAT THE JURY FOUND TO BE THE CASE!!
Sucks, huh?? He wrote his OPINION and one NOT BASED ON NY STATE LAW AT THE TIME OF THE VERDICT!!
What would have changed had the jury found that Grifty DID rape her according to NY criminal code?
:die:So STFU and take your Faux outrage over trump else where y a **** ******.
Try that again. I see being the ****** you are you not only edited the posts you did not have the balls to link it.
Beekeeper » Today, 7:27 am » wrote: ↑ So?? A judges OPINION does NOT OVERRIDE A JURY VERDICT, cupcake!!
Now tell, us, WHAT DOES THIS SAY??.....
https://www.politico.com/dims4/default/ ... 180432.png