Liberal Forum

Spineless crackers

ROG62 » 3 minutes ago » wrote: ↑

3 minutes ago

to what, numbnuts?



brown, you “claim” to be so smart…but literally? you don’t know your *** from a hole in the ground…

To a document, the meaning of which is entirely lost on you.

Blackvegetable » 10 minutes ago » wrote: ↑

10 minutes ago

I'm not the one too stupid to live...

yes, brown, you are…**** mouthbreather…
 

Blackvegetable » 7 minutes ago » wrote: ↑

7 minutes ago

To a document, the meaning of which is entirely lost on you.

keep bleating, brown…it won’t change Kaplan’s words…

“jury unanimously concluded Sexually abused” Kaplan quote
“Awarded her damages accordingly” Kaplan quote

You can literally SHUT THE **** UP now…
 

Blackvegetable » 8 minutes ago » wrote: ↑

8 minutes ago

Huey » 12 minutes ago » wrote: ↑

12 minutes ago

Here is the link.  

Do your own **** work like the rest of us.  What a dickhead.

https://www.politico.com/news/2023/05/0 ... l-00096059

The finding is entirely irrelevant. 
 

 

The finding proves that the jury did not find Trump liable for rape no matter how much you huff and puff and threaten to hold your breath.  You are wrong and you are not man enough to admit. 

And Kaplan's own words also prove it:

Judge Lewis Kaplan

"In the last analysis, defendant has been stalling this case for years. A jury unanimously concluded that he sexually abused and defamed plaintiff and awarded her damages accordingly.”

Yes, you are so goddamn stupid.

*Roshambo » 10 minutes ago » wrote: ↑

10 minutes ago

Forced penetration is rape

VaG, You can literally SHUT THE **** UP now…

1) Kaplan’s comment
2) “jury unanimously concluded Sexually abused” Kaplan quote
3) “Awarded her damages accordingly” Kaplan quote


 


 

Huey » 8 minutes ago » wrote: ↑

8 minutes ago

The finding proves that the jury did not find Trump liable for rape 

No...that is NOT what the finding means.

Blackvegetable » 4 minutes ago » wrote: ↑

4 minutes ago

Huey » 8 minutes ago » wrote: ↑

8 minutes ago

The finding proves that the jury did not find Trump liable for rape

No...that is NOT what the finding means.

Make your case.  And remember, I am not going to do your work.  If not, you can **** off you ignorant cowardly bitch.
 

ROG62 » 6 minutes ago » wrote: ↑

6 minutes ago

VaG, You can literally SHUT THE **** UP now…

1) Kaplan’s comment
2) “jury unanimously concluded Sexually abused” Kaplan quote
3) “Awarded her damages accordingly” Kaplan quote

JuCo,
when the toilet brush enters your rectum, against your will, we can call it a rectum scrub.

JuCo, forced penetration is rape.
 

ROG62 » 6 minutes ago » wrote: ↑

6 minutes ago

VaG, You can literally SHUT THE **** UP now…

1) Kaplan’s comment
2) “jury unanimously concluded Sexually abused” Kaplan quote
3) “Awarded her damages accordingly” Kaplan quote

What specific act of abuse was alleged?

“Awarded her damages accordingly” Kaplan quote



According to what?

Blackvegetable » 5 minutes ago » wrote: ↑

5 minutes ago

ROG62 » 11 minutes ago » wrote: ↑

11 minutes ago

VaG, You can literally SHUT THE **** UP now…

1) Kaplan’s comment
2) “jury unanimously concluded Sexually abused” Kaplan quote
3) “Awarded her damages accordingly” Kaplan quote

What specific act of abuse was alleged?

“Awarded her damages accordingly” Kaplan quote



According to what?

 

Make your own case, ******.  This is not a court of law nor are you a lawyer.  You are a mediocre finance guy living is a duplex.

Huey » 8 minutes ago » wrote: ↑

8 minutes ago

Make your case.  

It means that the jury did not find sufficient evidence to conclude that the penetration alleged was penile.

Acknowledge that you were answered.

Correctly.

Why did Kaplan opine?

 

Think of it this way. You are driving drunk, run a stop sign. You get pulled over. Somehow you pass the field sobriety test. The officer writes you a ticket for the stop sign.

You were driving drunk, you didn’t get caught. Yes you did it.

E Jean was penetrated, and we know who did it. Call it what you want, forced penetration is rape.

Huey » 8 minutes ago » wrote: ↑

8 minutes ago

Make your own case, 

There's good reason I'm always right on these matters, and you're not...

I've made the case...

You are refusing to acknowledge objective facts....again.

Huey » 13 minutes ago » wrote: ↑

13 minutes ago

Blackvegetable » 14 minutes ago » wrote: ↑

14 minutes ago

Huey » 18 minutes ago » wrote: ↑

18 minutes ago

The finding proves that the jury did not find Trump liable for rape

No...that is NOT what the finding means.

Make your case.  And remember, I am not going to do your work.  If not, you can **** off you ignorant cowardly bitch.
 

 

 

Blackvegetable » 7 minutes ago » wrote: ↑

7 minutes ago

Huey » 13 minutes ago » wrote: ↑

13 minutes ago

Make your case.  

It means that the jury did not find sufficient evidence to conclude that the penetration alleged was penile.

Acknowledge that you were answered.

Correctly.

Why did Kaplan opine?

 

 

You didn't answer a question.  I did't ask one.  You made your **** case which is not really correct and here is why:

It means that Carrol DID NOT provide sufficient evidence that she was raped under NY Law at the time,  You stupid **** it tells you on the Jury Verdict Form what it means.  Any narrative other than what question number asked is not the correct answer.  

You posted what he opined in the OP. 

*Roshambo » 10 minutes ago » wrote: ↑

10 minutes ago

Think of it this way. You are driving drunk, run a stop sign. You get pulled over. Somehow you pass the field sobriety test. The officer writes you a ticket for the stop sign.

You were driving drunk, you didn’t get caught. Yes you did it.

E Jean was penetrated, and we know who did it. Call it what you want, forced penetration is rape.

This was a brilliantly framed case...

It really left Grifty no outs...

Huey » 13 minutes ago » wrote: ↑

13 minutes ago

Blackvegetable » 15 minutes ago » wrote: ↑

15 minutes ago

ROG62 » 22 minutes ago » wrote: ↑

22 minutes ago

VaG, You can literally SHUT THE **** UP now…

1) Kaplan’s comment
2) “jury unanimously concluded Sexually abused” Kaplan quote
3) “Awarded her damages accordingly” Kaplan quote

What specific act of abuse was alleged?

“Awarded her damages accordingly” Kaplan quote



According to what?


 

Make your own case, ******.  This is not a court of law nor are you a lawyer.  You are a mediocre finance guy living is a duplex.

 

 

Blackvegetable » 6 minutes ago » wrote: ↑

6 minutes ago

Huey » 13 minutes ago » wrote: ↑

13 minutes ago

Make your own case, 

There's good reason I'm always right on these matters, and you're not...

I've made the case...

You are refusing to acknowledge objective facts....again.

 

You are not right.  Ask ABC.  They have 16 million reasons why you are wrong.  Read your OP.  Kaplan says you are wrong.

Bitch, when you post objective facts I will acknowledge. Unfortunately you are not very good at posting them.

Blackvegetable » Today, 7:41 am » wrote: ↑

Today, 7:41 am

While President Donald Trump attended the NATO summit in Ankara, a federal judge in New York on Wednesday ordered him to pay what he owes E. Jean Carroll after a jury held him liable for sexually abusing and defaming her. 

Judge Lewis Kaplan ordered disbursement of the $5 million judgment plus almost $800,000 in interest.  

"In the last analysis, defendant has been stalling this case for years. A jury unanimously concluded that he sexually abused and defamed plaintiff and awarded her damages accordingly. The judgment on that verdict has been upheld on appeal. En banc rehearing has been denied. The Supreme Court has denied certiorari without dissent," Kaplan wrote in an order late Wednesday. "It is time for him to 'do equity' and pay the judgment.” 

The decision comes after the U.S. Supreme Court last month, with no dissents, declined to hear Trump's appeal of the verdict and judgment. 

Trump's attorneys launched a long-shot bid to delay the payment and sought an administrative stay from United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit, however, in a one-page order on Wednesday evening, the appeals court rejected his request for a delay, clearing the way for the money to go to Carroll.  

The same court had already denied Trump's initial attempts to appeal the case, in addition to the Supreme Court's ruling.

https://abcnews.com/US/judge-orders-tru ... =134591703

Clinging...

 

ROG62 » 49 minutes ago » wrote: ↑

49 minutes ago

Blackvegetable » Today, 9:20 am » wrote: ↑

Today, 9:20 am

Tell everyone what the court ordered Grifty to pay...

Keep showing everyone what a stupid **** you are…

 

Huey » 45 minutes ago » wrote: ↑

45 minutes ago

Blackvegetable » 48 minutes ago » wrote: ↑

48 minutes ago

ROG62 » 55 minutes ago » wrote: ↑

55 minutes ago

You deaf,

I hear you clinging...

Desperately

You are doing the clinging.

Despite all of these TRUE objective facts, Kaplan's words:

A jury unanimously concludedthat he sexually abused and defamed plaintiff and awarded her damages accordingly

The whiny little bitch still won't admit he is wrong.  No wonder the bitch lives alone in a shared wall duplex.
 

Huey » 10 minutes ago » wrote: ↑

10 minutes ago

You didn't answer a question

Sez who?


You really don't understand **** about the law in general and less about this case in particular. 

A claim made in a petition for relief IS NOT A FACT.

It is an ARGUMENT, to which the judge is OBLIGED to respond, in the form of an Opinion. But he doesn't speak for himself, he speaks for the court.

You have dispensed with reading that document, insisting it is "personal opinion" and irrelevant. 


It is a position so stupid as to beggar my fertile imagination.

Huey » 4 minutes ago » wrote: ↑

4 minutes ago

Despite all of these TRUE objective facts, Kaplan's words:

A jury unanimously concludedthat he sexually abused and defamed plaintiff and awarded her damages accordingly

The whiny little bitch still won't admit he is wrong.  No wonder the bitch lives alone in a shared wall duplex.

Which he uttered in REJECTING the Team Grifty argument that the award was excessive because "it wasn't rape".