Liberal Forum

Huey » 09 Jul 2026, 10:31 am » wrote: ↑

09 Jul 2026, 10:31 am

Huey » 09 Jul 2026, 10:18 am » wrote: ↑

09 Jul 2026, 10:18 am

Blackvegetable » 09 Jul 2026, 10:17 am » wrote: ↑

09 Jul 2026, 10:17 am

No...that is NOT what the finding means.

Make your case.  And remember, I am not going to do your work.  If not, you can **** off you ignorant cowardly bitch.
 


 

Blackvegetable » 09 Jul 2026, 10:24 am » wrote: ↑

09 Jul 2026, 10:24 am

Huey » 09 Jul 2026, 10:18 am » wrote: ↑

09 Jul 2026, 10:18 am

Make your case.  

It means that the jury did not find sufficient evidence to conclude that the penetration alleged was penile.

Acknowledge that you were answered.

Correctly.

Why did Kaplan opine?

 


 

You didn't answer a question.  I did't ask one.  You made your **** case which is not really correct and here is why:

It means that Carrol DID NOT provide sufficient evidence that she was raped under NY Law at the time,  You stupid **** it tells you on the Jury Verdict Form what it means.  Any narrative other than what question number asked is not the correct answer.  

You posted what he opined in the OP. 

 

Blackvegetable » 09 Jul 2026, 10:38 am » wrote: ↑

09 Jul 2026, 10:38 am

Huey » 09 Jul 2026, 10:31 am » wrote: ↑

09 Jul 2026, 10:31 am

You didn't answer a question

Sez who?


You really don't understand **** about the law in general and less about this case in particular. 

A claim made in a petition for relief IS NOT A FACT.

It is an ARGUMENT, to which the judge is OBLIGED to respond, in the form of an Opinion. But he doesn't speak for himself, he speaks for the court.

You have dispensed with reading that document, insisting it is "personal opinion" and irrelevant. 


It is a position so stupid as to beggar my fertile imagination.

 

Huey » 09 Jul 2026, 10:32 am » wrote: ↑

09 Jul 2026, 10:32 am

You are not right.  Ask ABC.  

Huey » 09 Jul 2026, 10:41 am » wrote: ↑

09 Jul 2026, 10:41 am

****** Bitch, try 

Blackvegetable » 09 Jul 2026, 10:41 am » wrote: ↑

09 Jul 2026, 10:41 am

Huey » 09 Jul 2026, 10:37 am » wrote: ↑

09 Jul 2026, 10:37 am

Despite all of these TRUE objective facts, Kaplan's words:

A jury unanimously concludedthat he sexually abused and defamed plaintiff and awarded her damages accordingly

The whiny little bitch still won't admit he is wrong.  No wonder the bitch lives alone in a shared wall duplex.

Which he uttered in REJECTING the Team Grifty argument that the award was excessive because "it wasn't rape".

 

Huey » 09 Jul 2026, 10:37 am » wrote: ↑

09 Jul 2026, 10:37 am

Blackvegetable » 09 Jul 2026, 7:41 am » wrote: ↑

09 Jul 2026, 7:41 am

While President Donald Trump attended the NATO summit in Ankara, a federal judge in New York on Wednesday ordered him to pay what he owes E. Jean Carroll after a jury held him liable for sexually abusing and defaming her. 

Judge Lewis Kaplan ordered disbursement of the $5 million judgment plus almost $800,000 in interest.  

"In the last analysis, defendant has been stalling this case for years. A jury unanimously concluded that he sexually abused and defamed plaintiff and awarded her damages accordingly. The judgment on that verdict has been upheld on appeal. En banc rehearing has been denied. The Supreme Court has denied certiorari without dissent," Kaplan wrote in an order late Wednesday. "It is time for him to 'do equity' and pay the judgment.” 

The decision comes after the U.S. Supreme Court last month, with no dissents, declined to hear Trump's appeal of the verdict and judgment. 

Trump's attorneys launched a long-shot bid to delay the payment and sought an administrative stay from United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit, however, in a one-page order on Wednesday evening, the appeals court rejected his request for a delay, clearing the way for the money to go to Carroll.  

The same court had already denied Trump's initial attempts to appeal the case, in addition to the Supreme Court's ruling.

https://abcnews.com/US/judge-orders-tru ... =134591703

Clinging...

ROG62 » 09 Jul 2026, 9:52 am » wrote: ↑

09 Jul 2026, 9:52 am

Blackvegetable » 09 Jul 2026, 9:20 am » wrote: ↑

09 Jul 2026, 9:20 am

Tell everyone what the court ordered Grifty to pay...

Keep showing everyone what a stupid **** you are…

Huey » 09 Jul 2026, 9:56 am » wrote: ↑

09 Jul 2026, 9:56 am

Blackvegetable » 09 Jul 2026, 9:53 am » wrote: ↑

09 Jul 2026, 9:53 am

I hear you clinging...

Desperately

You are doing the clinging.

Despite all of these TRUE objective facts, Kaplan's words:

A jury unanimously concludedthat he sexually abused and defamed plaintiff and awarded her damages accordingly

The whiny little bitch still won't admit he is wrong.  No wonder the bitch lives alone in a shared wall duplex.
 

 

Blackvegetable » 09 Jul 2026, 10:42 am » wrote: ↑

09 Jul 2026, 10:42 am

Huey » 09 Jul 2026, 10:41 am » wrote: ↑

09 Jul 2026, 10:41 am

****** Bitch, try 

No...it's done. 

 

Blackvegetable » 09 Jul 2026, 10:41 am » wrote: ↑

09 Jul 2026, 10:41 am

Huey » 09 Jul 2026, 10:32 am » wrote: ↑

09 Jul 2026, 10:32 am

You are not right.  Ask ABC.  

Make your case why ABC matters.

 

Huey » 09 Jul 2026, 10:37 am » wrote: ↑

09 Jul 2026, 10:37 am

Blackvegetable » 09 Jul 2026, 7:41 am » wrote: ↑

09 Jul 2026, 7:41 am

While President Donald Trump attended the NATO summit in Ankara, a federal judge in New York on Wednesday ordered him to pay what he owes E. Jean Carroll after a jury held him liable for sexually abusing and defaming her. 

Judge Lewis Kaplan ordered disbursement of the $5 million judgment plus almost $800,000 in interest.  

"In the last analysis, defendant has been stalling this case for years. A jury unanimously concluded that he sexually abused and defamed plaintiff and awarded her damages accordingly. The judgment on that verdict has been upheld on appeal. En banc rehearing has been denied. The Supreme Court has denied certiorari without dissent," Kaplan wrote in an order late Wednesday. "It is time for him to 'do equity' and pay the judgment.” 

The decision comes after the U.S. Supreme Court last month, with no dissents, declined to hear Trump's appeal of the verdict and judgment. 

Trump's attorneys launched a long-shot bid to delay the payment and sought an administrative stay from United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit, however, in a one-page order on Wednesday evening, the appeals court rejected his request for a delay, clearing the way for the money to go to Carroll.  

The same court had already denied Trump's initial attempts to appeal the case, in addition to the Supreme Court's ruling.

https://abcnews.com/US/judge-orders-tru ... =134591703

Clinging...

ROG62 » 09 Jul 2026, 9:52 am » wrote: ↑

09 Jul 2026, 9:52 am

Blackvegetable » 09 Jul 2026, 9:20 am » wrote: ↑

09 Jul 2026, 9:20 am

Tell everyone what the court ordered Grifty to pay...

Keep showing everyone what a stupid **** you are…

Huey » 09 Jul 2026, 9:56 am » wrote: ↑

09 Jul 2026, 9:56 am

Blackvegetable » 09 Jul 2026, 9:53 am » wrote: ↑

09 Jul 2026, 9:53 am

I hear you clinging...

Desperately

You are doing the clinging.

Despite all of these TRUE objective facts, Kaplan's words:

A jury unanimously concludedthat he sexually abused and defamed plaintiff and awarded her damages accordingly

The whiny little bitch still won't admit he is wrong.  No wonder the bitch lives alone in a shared wall duplex.
 

 

Huey » 09 Jul 2026, 10:43 am » wrote: ↑

09 Jul 2026, 10:43 am

****** bitch it is done.  You lost BIGLY!

Huey » 09 Jul 2026, 10:45 am » wrote: ↑

09 Jul 2026, 10:45 am

Below is my case.  Notice I did on my own without demanding your Bitch *** do it for me.

Huey » 09 Jul 2026, 10:43 am » wrote: ↑

09 Jul 2026, 10:43 am

You lose. Game.  Set.  And **** Match.  Bring this **** up again, Bitch, the only reply I am giving.  Those three examples.

Blackvegetable » 09 Jul 2026, 7:41 am » wrote: ↑

09 Jul 2026, 7:41 am

While President Donald Trump attended the NATO summit in Ankara, a federal judge in New York on Wednesday ordered him to pay what he owes E. Jean Carroll after a jury held him liable for sexually abusing and defaming her. 

Judge Lewis Kaplan ordered disbursement of the $5 million judgment plus almost $800,000 in interest.  


"In the last analysis, defendant has been stalling this case for years. A jury unanimously concluded that he sexually abused and defamed plaintiff and awarded her damages accordingly. The judgment on that verdict has been upheld on appeal. En banc rehearing has been denied. The Supreme Court has denied certiorari without dissent," Kaplan wrote in an order late Wednesday. "It is time for him to 'do equity' and pay the judgment.” 




The decision comes after the U.S. Supreme Court last month, with no dissents, declined to hear Trump's appeal of the verdict and judgment. 

Trump's attorneys launched a long-shot bid to delay the payment and sought an administrative stay from United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit, however, in a one-page order on Wednesday evening, the appeals court rejected his request for a delay, clearing the way for the money to go to Carroll.  

The same court had already denied Trump's initial attempts to appeal the case, in addition to the Supreme Court's ruling.


https://abcnews.com/US/judge-orders-tru ... =134591703


Clinging...


 

 

Blackvegetable » 09 Jul 2026, 10:47 am » wrote: ↑

09 Jul 2026, 10:47 am

Huey » 09 Jul 2026, 10:43 am » wrote: ↑

09 Jul 2026, 10:43 am

You lose. Game.  Set.  And **** Match.  Bring this **** up again, Bitch, the only reply I am giving.  Those three examples.

There's no argument here....you're just rebleating what you don't understand. 

 

Blackvegetable » 09 Jul 2026, 10:46 am » wrote: ↑

09 Jul 2026, 10:46 am

Huey » 09 Jul 2026, 10:45 am » wrote: ↑

09 Jul 2026, 10:45 am

Below is my case.  Notice I did on my own without demanding your Bitch *** do it for me.

I don't see a case....
Post it in discreet bullet points.
 

 

Huey » 09 Jul 2026, 10:52 am » wrote: ↑

09 Jul 2026, 10:52 am

Huey » 09 Jul 2026, 10:50 am » wrote: ↑

09 Jul 2026, 10:50 am

A jury unanimously concludedthat he sexually abused and defamed plaintiff and awarded her damages accordingly

No, there is no argument here.  You own OP says you are wrong.

Blackvegetable » 09 Jul 2026, 10:54 am » wrote: ↑

09 Jul 2026, 10:54 am

Huey » 09 Jul 2026, 10:50 am » wrote: ↑

09 Jul 2026, 10:50 am

A jury unanimously concludedthat he sexually abused and defamed plaintiff and awarded her damages accordingly

No, there is no argument here.  You own OP says you are wrong.

No, it doesn't. 

You can't read.
 
 

 

Blackvegetable » 09 Jul 2026, 10:53 am » wrote: ↑

09 Jul 2026, 10:53 am

Huey » 09 Jul 2026, 10:52 am » wrote: ↑

09 Jul 2026, 10:52 am

Tiny,

You're a little coward in a mullet..



 

 

Huey » 09 Jul 2026, 10:58 am » wrote: ↑

09 Jul 2026, 10:58 am

****** Bitch, you have my name.

Huey » 09 Jul 2026, 10:56 am » wrote: ↑

09 Jul 2026, 10:56 am

That and the jury verdict form say you are a liar.

Blackvegetable » 09 Jul 2026, 10:59 am » wrote: ↑

09 Jul 2026, 10:59 am

Huey » 09 Jul 2026, 10:58 am » wrote: ↑

09 Jul 2026, 10:58 am

****** Bitch, you have my name.

YOU....RUN....FROM...YOUR...OWN....WORDS....
.
 

 

Huey » 09 Jul 2026, 10:58 am » wrote: ↑

09 Jul 2026, 10:58 am

Blackvegetable » 09 Jul 2026, 10:53 am » wrote: ↑

09 Jul 2026, 10:53 am

Huey » 09 Jul 2026, 10:52 am » wrote: ↑

09 Jul 2026, 10:52 am

Tiny,

You're a little coward in a mullet..



 


 

****** Bitch, you have my name.  You have my address.  You know what I look like.  I have never had a mullet.

You hide behind anonymity on an Internet forum.  You know where to find me.