Liberal Forum

Beekeeper » 13 Jul 2026, 6:26 am » wrote: ↑

13 Jul 2026, 6:26 am

You HAVE

Silence, Coward.
 

Blackvegetable » 13 Jul 2026, 6:28 am » wrote: ↑

13 Jul 2026, 6:28 am

Silence, Coward.

But Kaplan DID instruct the JURY that the DEFINITION OF RAPE was per the NY State PENAL CODE DEFINITION!! He gave to "clarification" on that one !!

WHY WAS THAT, CUPCAKE?? WHY DID KAPLAN NOT "clarify" the "definition of rape as commonly believed" in his JURY INSTRUCTIONS???

Beekeeper » 13 Jul 2026, 6:29 am » wrote: ↑

13 Jul 2026, 6:29 am

But Kaplan DID instruct the JURY that the DEFINITION OF RAPE was per the NY State PENAL CODE DEFINITION!! He gave to "clarification" on that one !!

WHY WAS THAT, CUPCAKE?? WHY DID KAPLAN NOT "clarify" the "definition of rape as commonly believed" in his JURY INSTRUCTIONS???

Your point is moot.


Answered.
 

Blackvegetable » 13 Jul 2026, 6:35 am » wrote: ↑

13 Jul 2026, 6:35 am

Your point is moot.

Answered.

OH NO, ****!! MORE OF YOUR RUNNING ****!!

ANSWER THE **** QUESTION....

WHY DID KAPLAN NOT "clarify" the "definition of rape as commonly believed" in his JURY INSTRUCTIONS???
 

Beekeeper » 13 Jul 2026, 6:36 am » wrote: ↑

13 Jul 2026, 6:36 am

OH NO, ****!! MORE OF YOUR RUNNING ****!!

 

You just claimed that it was an answer.


 

Beekeeper » 13 Jul 2026, 6:36 am » wrote: ↑

13 Jul 2026, 6:36 am

OH NO, ****!! MORE OF YOUR RUNNING ****!!

ANSWER THE **** QUESTION....

WHY DID KAPLAN NOT "clarify" the "definition of rape as commonly believed" in his JURY INSTRUCTIONS???

Had they answered "yes", would Grifty have gone to jail?
 

It wasn't a criminal case, ****!!! So your point is MOOT, cupcake!!

So **** g'ddammned stupid 

Blackvegetable » 13 Jul 2026, 6:37 am » wrote: ↑

13 Jul 2026, 6:37 am

You just claimed that it was an answer.

NO WHERE in that is any claim you answered JACK ****, ASSHOLE!!

WHY DID KAPLAN NOT "clarify" the "definition of rape as commonly believed" in his JURY INSTRUCTIONS???

NOW ANSWER THE G'DAMN QUESTION!!

And you want to cut deals for questions?? YOUR A **** COWARD AND A PIECE OF **** that EATS YOUR OWN ****!!

**** OFF UNTIL YOU ANSWER THE QUESTION!!

WHY DID KAPLAN NOT "clarify" the "definition of rape as commonly believed" in his JURY INSTRUCTIONS???
 

Blackvegetable » 13 Jul 2026, 6:41 am » wrote: ↑

13 Jul 2026, 6:41 am

Had they answered "yes", would Grifty have gone to jail?

So **** g'ddammned stupid

I answered that already, MORON!!

WHY DID KAPLAN NOT "clarify" the "definition of rape as commonly believed" in his JURY INSTRUCTIONS???

Beekeeper » 13 Jul 2026, 6:42 am » wrote: ↑

13 Jul 2026, 6:42 am

I answered that already, MORON!!

WHY DID KAPLAN NOT "clarify" the "definition of rape as commonly believed" in his JURY INSTRUCTIONS???

I answered that already, MORON!!

Blackvegetable » 13 Jul 2026, 6:49 am » wrote: ↑

13 Jul 2026, 6:49 am

I answered that already, MORON!!

LIAR!!

I PROVED I answered your **** NOW ANSWER MINE!!

WHY DID KAPLAN NOT "clarify" the "definition of rape as commonly believed" in his JURY INSTRUCTIONS???

There's NOTHING MOOT about this QUESTION. ANSWER OR KEEP RUNNING as you ALWAYS DO!!

STOP BEGGING FOR SOMEONE TO "Take the deal" you offer on questions because YOU HAVE ZERO INTENTIONS OF KEEPING IT!!

WHY DID KAPLAN NOT "clarify" the "definition of rape as commonly believed" in his JURY INSTRUCTIONS???
WHY DID KAPLAN NOT "clarify" the "definition of rape as commonly believed" in his JURY INSTRUCTIONS???
WHY DID KAPLAN NOT "clarify" the "definition of rape as commonly believed" in his JURY INSTRUCTIONS???

WHY DID KAPLAN NOT "clarify" the "definition of rape as commonly believed" in his JURY INSTRUCTIONS???

Blackvegetable » Sun Jul 12, 2026 3:30 pm » wrote: ↑
Sun Jul 12, 2026 3:30 pm
Where are you getting this ****?

Had they answered "yes", would Grifty have gone to jail?
It wasn't a criminal case, ****!!! So your point is MOOT, cupcake!!

But Kaplan DID instruct the JURY that the DEFINITION OF RAPE was per the NY State PENAL CODE DEFINITION!! He gave to "clarification" on that one !!

WHY WAS THAT, CUPCAKE?? WHY DID KAPLAN NOT "clarify" the "definition of rape as commonly believed" in his JURY INSTRUCTIONS???

Now ANSWER THE **** QUESTION!!

!!
 

Blackvegetable » 13 Jul 2026, 6:49 am » wrote: ↑

13 Jul 2026, 6:49 am

I answered that already, MORON!!

 

Douchey, Again, I did not mention the rape allegations when discussing your lack of balls when it comes to criticizing Platner and those who supported him after news of his Nazi tattoo, racism and support of political violence became known.   Stop editing and read, Puss.  How stupid are you, Puss?
 

Beekeeper » 13 Jul 2026, 6:51 am » wrote: ↑

13 Jul 2026, 6:51 am

LIAR!!

I PROVED I answered your **** NOW ANSWER MINE!!

WHY DID KAPLAN NOT "clarify" the "definition of rape as commonly believed" in his JURY INSTRUCTIONS???

There's NOTHING MOOT about this QUESTION. ANSWER OR KEEP RUNNING as you ALWAYS DO!!

STOP BEGGING FOR SOMEONE TO "Take the deal" you offer on questions because YOU HAVE ZERO INTENTIONS OF KEEPING IT!!

WHY DID KAPLAN NOT "clarify" the "definition of rape as commonly believed" in his JURY INSTRUCTIONS???
WHY DID KAPLAN NOT "clarify" the "definition of rape as commonly believed" in his JURY INSTRUCTIONS???
WHY DID KAPLAN NOT "clarify" the "definition of rape as commonly believed" in his JURY INSTRUCTIONS???

WHY DID KAPLAN NOT "clarify" the "definition of rape as commonly believed" in his JURY INSTRUCTIONS???

!!

Blackvegetable » 13 Jul 2026, 6:28 am » wrote: ↑

13 Jul 2026, 6:28 am

Silence, Coward.
 

the courage of a rational minds hiding in the context of we the people built every reality's state of mind nobody can understand life defined by rule of law.

Chromosomes aren't context recited by ancestors every generation in history of developing 7 artificial tomorrows 52 weeks a revolution around the star in a constant 1460 rotations every 4 years.

Every February 29 is the joker is wild card of factual recorded history of human behavior ignoring how evolving was self evident by one's own chromosomes.

Huey » 13 Jul 2026, 6:53 am » wrote: ↑

13 Jul 2026, 6:53 am

Douchey, Again, I did not mention the rape allegations when 

Why not?

Beekeeper » 13 Jul 2026, 6:51 am » wrote: ↑

13 Jul 2026, 6:51 am

LIAR!!

I PROVED I answered your **** NOW ANSWER MINE!!

WHY DID KAPLAN NOT "clarify" the "definition of rape as commonly believed" in his JURY INSTRUCTIONS???

There's NOTHING MOOT about this QUESTION. ANSWER OR KEEP RUNNING as you ALWAYS DO!!

STOP BEGGING FOR SOMEONE TO "Take the deal" you offer on questions because YOU HAVE ZERO INTENTIONS OF KEEPING IT!!

WHY DID KAPLAN NOT "clarify" the "definition of rape as commonly believed" in his JURY INSTRUCTIONS???
WHY DID KAPLAN NOT "clarify" the "definition of rape as commonly believed" in his JURY INSTRUCTIONS???
WHY DID KAPLAN NOT "clarify" the "definition of rape as commonly believed" in his JURY INSTRUCTIONS???

WHY DID KAPLAN NOT "clarify" the "definition of rape as commonly believed" in his JURY INSTRUCTIONS???

!!

You are so remarkably **** stupid. 

Post your "answer" to my question...
 

Blackvegetable » 13 Jul 2026, 6:58 am » wrote: ↑

13 Jul 2026, 6:58 am

Why not?

 

Because before the 2nd one it was known he had the Nazi tattoo, racist posts and supported political violence. 

No **** Douchey.  Again, I did not mention the rape allegations when discussing your lack of balls when it comes to criticizing Platner and those who supported him after news of his Nazi tattoo, racism and support of political violence became known.   Stop editing and read, Puss.  How stupid are you, Puss?

Huey » 13 Jul 2026, 7:01 am » wrote: ↑

13 Jul 2026, 7:01 am

Because before the 2nd one it was known he had the Nazi tattoo, racist posts and supported political violence. 


 

That makes no sense at all.

What makes much more sense is that you can't deny your extreme vulnerability on that particular score....you not only flack for a rapist, you call the presiding judge of his trial a "soshulis" for confirming the jury’s verdict.

Blackvegetable » 13 Jul 2026, 7:00 am » wrote: ↑

13 Jul 2026, 7:00 am

You are so remarkably **** stupid. 

Post your "answer" to my question...
 

He defends social consensus from the bench assuring everyone stays arguing for the justice system to prevail against any honest sole reaching public arena of ideas.

Codes of silence operate institutionally constituting human rights to stay in character cradle to grave. Mind your social state of mind or else. That exists in Biblical application as well as political and economic states of minds and souls protecting freedom of choice to ignore all each has been since conceived.

State who you are again socially? Genetically alive you are just another reproduction ignoring why your own chromosomes keep you uniquely alive now.

Blackvegetable » 13 Jul 2026, 7:06 am » wrote: ↑

13 Jul 2026, 7:06 am

That makes no sense at all.

What makes much more sense is that you can't deny your extreme vulnerability on that particular score....you not only flack for a rapist, you call the presiding judge of his trial a "soshulis" for confirming the jury’s verdict.

 

Top dems supported the idiot AFTER they knew about his Nazi tattoo, his racist comments and the fact he supported political violence.  Is that clear enough for you?  Apparently you and yours have no problems with Nazis, rapists and those that support political violence as long as you think they can win.  
 

Blackvegetable » 13 Jul 2026, 7:06 am » wrote: ↑

13 Jul 2026, 7:06 am

That makes no sense at all.

What makes much more sense is that you can't deny your extreme vulnerability on that particular score....you not only flack for a rapist, you call the presiding judge of his trial a "soshulis" for confirming the jury’s verdict.

I am frustrated with any politician taking AIPAC Money.. I perceive AIPAC money surfaced the Platner allegation. 

There is a lot of discussion Moskowitz needs to go, I am not sure of the details..  He is a firebrand in the house against Trump.

It's complicated, and we have discussed this..   I am not so trusting of many democrats..  Many have the Bibi virus..
,
Schumer is old and tenured enough.  I really think we need to limit Senators to a max of three terms. And I think in emergency vacancies (we have one of those, possibly two) the governor of the state should cast any peertinent senate votes needed..