Liberal Forum

Huey » 15 Jul 2026, 7:18 am » wrote: ↑

15 Jul 2026, 7:18 am

The official court filings on record do not call it rape.

The legal opinion on record reads as follows


“The finding that Ms. Carroll failed to prove that she was ‘raped’ within the meaning of the New York Penal Law does not mean that she failed to prove that Mr. Trump ‘raped’ her as many people commonly understand the word ‘rape.

Indeed, as the evidence at trial recounted below makes clear, the jury found that Mr. Trump in fact did exactly that.”


Nod.
 

Huey » 15 Jul 2026, 7:08 am » wrote: ↑

15 Jul 2026, 7:08 am

He blames the Trump legal team.

Tiny,

Don't. 


You have no idea what you're talking about.
 

Blackvegetable » 15 Jul 2026, 7:32 am » wrote: ↑

15 Jul 2026, 7:32 am

Carroll made it all the way through SCOTUS...

 @*TinyVictim - "Something's fishy."

"Barisma" [sic] couldn't generate a referral out of a partisan committee...


And you wonder why you're a moron.
 

 

Win an election and investigate.  I got no problem with that.  
 

Huey » 15 Jul 2026, 7:40 am » wrote: ↑

15 Jul 2026, 7:40 am

Win an election and investigate.  I got no problem with that.

This is actually about how **** stupid you are...

Blackvegetable » 15 Jul 2026, 7:44 am » wrote: ↑

15 Jul 2026, 7:44 am

This is actually about how **** stupid you are...

 

And this about how toady you are.  I support investigations.  You only support them if it is a republican or non liberal dem  

Huey » 15 Jul 2026, 7:53 am » wrote: ↑

15 Jul 2026, 7:53 am

And this about how toady you are.  I support investigations.  You only support them if it is a republican or non liberal dem

  I support investigations.

:rofl:  


You consider legal opinions irrelevant. 

You dutifully averted your eyes from the Jan 6th hearings.

You support Obstruction of Justice, felony, rape and Insurrection. 

Huey » 15 Jul 2026, 7:18 am » wrote: ↑

15 Jul 2026, 7:18 am

The official court filings on record do not call it rape.

anywhere…

Blackvegetable » 15 Jul 2026, 6:59 am » wrote: ↑

15 Jul 2026, 6:59 am

First you would need to demonstrate that you can distinguish between a legal.and a personal opinion.

It appears you cannot...

Because you're as **** stupid as

@ROG62  

and

@Huey

What’s easy to distinguish is Kaplan’s opining had absolutely ZERO bearing on the outcome of the verdict or award, because it was after the fact to which he later conceded to the jury….

**** you’re stupid…
 

Blackvegetable » 15 Jul 2026, 7:35 am » wrote: ↑

15 Jul 2026, 7:35 am

The legal opinion on record reads as follows.
 

Priceless. Evolving as genetically here since conception vs societal evolution of people ignoring all they been since conceived after birth. Brain came from something evolving from the start of the lifetime currently living as part of a species, ancestral lineage, generation gap, ancestor currently inhabiting time daily here.

Understand everything or believe in something other than what one has been from the start of their time inhabiting space so far.
What is a bigger picture than the complete universe here now?

Your mind compares parts of the whole process against the whole processing of life adapting forward so far each brain navigating the time they lived since birth as one of a kind within current global population living now.

You debate anything else is possible and nobody can understand the specificity of existing here a part of the whole 8.2 billion "people" pretending life exceeds adapting since displaced in their relative genetic position in a specific ancestor, generation gap, ancestral lineage, species, food chain in one universal location, geographically here, evolving equally present since conception, after inception of their ancestral lineage.

Loyalty vs royalty. Fellowships honoring chain of command in social justifications life isn't self evident adapting one at a time now. There is no greater good sacrificing biological time to stay true to suggestions life isn't what is evolving forward now as a whole universe currently never same details twice.

Personal free will choices between ancestral results existing cradle to grave governed by context for communicating between each brain existing with a beating heart changing form since their point of origin occupying time daily here womb, birth, aging as one of a kind, death, dead to decomposition.

Ashes to ashes and dust to dust. Periodic molecular content sustains universal positions perpetually balancing details never same genetic results twice.

Balance happens between expanding details never same results twice works within molecular content as well as organic results. If it didn't there would be no life as part of a food chain existing in one atmosphere like this planet has had so far.

Contextual history covers people living cradle to grave, chromosomes recorded which generation gaps are currently inhabiting time daily here.

Hell of a natural precedence don't you think navigating time in your own skin, among your own kin, simple evolving since a fertilized cell.

Huey » 15 Jul 2026, 7:20 am » wrote: ↑

15 Jul 2026, 7:20 am

Sounds as skectchy as Hunter Biden's dealings with Barisma and the big guy.

Yea....just like it.


Among the newly declassified intelligence documents Trump released Thursday are assessments that the Russian president and senior Russian officials directed proxy efforts to spread allegations about Joe Biden and Burisma, the Ukrainian gas company where Hunter Biden was a board director, orchestrate a corruption scandal against the Democratic nominee, and “ensure the President’s victory,” a reference to Trump, who was the incumbent at the time.


https://www.thedailybeast.com/trump-acc ... tion-dump/

ROG62 » 16 Jul 2026, 11:36 pm » wrote: ↑

16 Jul 2026, 11:36 pm

What’s easy to distinguish is Kaplan’s opining had absolutely ZERO bearing on the outcome of the verdict or award, because it was after the fact to which he later conceded to the jury….

**** you’re stupid…

:rofl:  

What’s easy to distinguish is Kaplan’s opining had absolutely ZERO bearing on the outcome of the verdict or award, 

Why did he opine?

because it was after the fact to which he later conceded to the jury….

:die:  

What did he "concede" to the jury, and when?


WE WILL HAVE A RUNNER!

ROG62 » 16 Jul 2026, 11:36 pm » wrote: ↑

16 Jul 2026, 11:36 pm

What’s easy to distinguish is Kaplan’s opining had absolutely ZERO bearing on the outcome of the verdict or award, because it was after the fact to which he later conceded to the jury….

**** you’re stupid…

This may be one of the dumbest posts, ever.

Blackvegetable » 17 Jul 2026, 5:03 am » wrote: ↑

17 Jul 2026, 5:03 am

Yea....just like it.

Among the newly declassified intelligence documents Trump released Thursday are assessments that the Russian president and senior Russian officials directed proxy efforts to spread allegations about Joe Biden and Burisma, the Ukrainian gas company where Hunter Biden was a board director, orchestrate a corruption scandal against the Democratic nominee, and “ensure the President’s victory,” a reference to Trump, who was the incumbent at the time.

https://www.thedailybeast.com/trump-acc ... tion-dump/

Sho nuff!  Putin's  Puppet!

Blackvegetable » 17 Jul 2026, 5:03 am » wrote: ↑

17 Jul 2026, 5:03 am

Huey » 15 Jul 2026, 7:20 am » wrote: ↑

15 Jul 2026, 7:20 am

Sounds as skectchy as Hunter Biden's dealings with Barisma and the big guy.

Yea....just like it.


Among the newly declassified intelligence documents Trump released Thursday are assessments that the Russian president and senior Russian officials directed proxy efforts to spread allegations about Joe Biden and Burisma, the Ukrainian gas company where Hunter Biden was a board director, orchestrate a corruption scandal against the Democratic nominee, and “ensure the President’s victory,” a reference to Trump, who was the incumbent at the time.


https://www.thedailybeast.com/trump-acc ... tion-dump/

 

Oh, you are saying that Hunter DID NOT get a job with Burisma.  Got it.
 

Huey » 17 Jul 2026, 7:43 am » wrote: ↑

17 Jul 2026, 7:43 am

Oh, you are saying that Hunter DID NOT get a job with Burisma.  Got it.

The citation actually says that he WAS a board member at Burisma.



 

Blackvegetable » 17 Jul 2026, 8:23 am » wrote: ↑

17 Jul 2026, 8:23 am

Huey » 17 Jul 2026, 7:43 am » wrote: ↑

17 Jul 2026, 7:43 am

Oh, you are saying that Hunter DID NOT get a job with Burisma.  Got it.

The citation actually says that he WAS a board member at Burisma.



 

 

We have a thread on your misunderstanding of that Forecast Track Map.  If you wish to discuss it go there.

Ok, just to be clear, BV is on the record saying Hunter did have a Job with Barisma during his father's time as VP.

'nuff said.
 

Huey » 17 Jul 2026, 8:29 am » wrote: ↑

17 Jul 2026, 8:29 am

We have a thread on your misunderstanding of 

One of your stupids at a time, please.

 

Blackvegetable » 17 Jul 2026, 8:31 am » wrote: ↑

17 Jul 2026, 8:31 am

One of your stupids at a time, please.

We have a thread on your misunderstanding of that Forecast Track Map.  If you wish to discuss it go there.

Ok, just to be clear, BV is on the record saying Hunter did have a Job with Barisma during his father's time as VP.

'nuff said.
 

Huey » 17 Jul 2026, 8:29 am » wrote: ↑

17 Jul 2026, 8:29 am

We have a thread on your misunderstanding of that Forecast Track Map.  If you wish to discuss it go there.

Ok, just to be clear, BV is on the record saying Hunter did have a Job with Barisma during his father's time as VP.

'nuff said.

Ok, just to be clear, BV is on the record saying Hunter did have a Job with Barisma during his father's time as VP.

No... 

'nuff said.

I think your two stands pretty much sum up the spectrum of possibilities. 

Huey » 17 Jul 2026, 8:32 am » wrote: ↑

17 Jul 2026, 8:32 am

We have a thread on your misunderstanding of that Forecast Track Map.  If you wish to discuss it go there.

Ok, just to be clear, BV is on the record saying Hunter did have a Job with Barisma during his father's time as VP.

'nuff said.

We have a thread on your misunderstanding of that Forecast Track Map

No, we don't....you may have a retelling to that effect...but that's to be expected.. 

If you wish to discuss it go there.

missing the point is your greatest strength.