Liberal Forum

Blackvegetable » 6 minutes ago » wrote: ↑

6 minutes ago

And I've listed them.

You insisted we must do this in order.

Nov. 2024 is Stand #1...

It is in direct conflict with Stand #2, of June 10.

Stand #3 is a meme. You won't tell us what you mean, so I must guess.

I'm guessing it is something I taught you about the cost of Grifty's impotent bluster..

Which would appear in conflict with Stand #2...

You may now clear all this up.

No quotes using the reply feature nor the issue you have with them.

Huey » 11 minutes ago » wrote: ↑

11 minutes ago

No quotes using the reply feature nor the issue you have with them.

Why do you need formats and aids to recall your own words when quoted verbatim?

Blackvegetable » 25 minutes ago » wrote: ↑

25 minutes ago

Why do you need formats and aids to recall your own words when quoted verbatim?

You haven't quoted those three divergent stances on Iran verbatim or using the reply feature.

If that is your answer DO NOT EVAH presume to demand you linked words again. 
 

Blackvegetable » Yesterday, 9:11 am » wrote: ↑

Yesterday, 9:11 am

What is your current stand on the Iran War?

there is no United States declared war on Iran? Legislative branch at the federal level didn't legislate one yet.

Huey » 9 minutes ago » wrote: ↑

9 minutes ago

You haven't quoted those three divergent stances on Iran verbatim 

You're lying...

The only one I haven't posted again is the meme....cause there's no verby things...

Blackvegetable » Today, 7:50 am » wrote: ↑

Today, 7:50 am

You're lying...

The only one I haven't posted again is the meme....cause there's no verby things...

 

As your around the forum claiming you beat me I am still waiting for you to post these three divergent stands on Iran using the reply feature or using cut and paste with a link.  Plus an explanation as to why you think they are different.  

I am not running Puss, I am standing right before the finish line waiting on your dumb ***.

Huey » 30 minutes ago » wrote: ↑

30 minutes ago

As your around the forum claiming you beat me I am still waiting for you to post these three divergent stands on Iran using the reply feature or using cut and paste with a link.  Plus an explanation as to why you think they are different.  

I am not running Puss, I am standing right before the finish line waiting on your dumb ***.

No...

I've posted many of your words....verbatim...

You have never explained why you must have it in some format.


 

Blackvegetable » 4 minutes ago » wrote: ↑

4 minutes ago

No...

I've posted many of your words....verbatim...

You have never explained why you must have it in some format.

As your around the forum claiming you beat me I am still waiting for you to post these three divergent stands on Iran using the reply feature or using cut and paste with a link.  Plus an explanation as to why you think they are different.  

I am not running Puss, I am standing right before the finish line waiting on your dumb ***.

waiting.  And you have not shown why they are divergent.  You play lawyer all the time.  It doesn’t work this way.  You are running.  

Huey » 6 minutes ago » wrote: ↑

6 minutes ago

As your around the forum claiming you beat me I ...
.

  You play lawyer all the time.  It doesn’t work this way.  You are running.

I'm not the one running from my words, quoted verbatim, because they weren't presented to me in a specific format.

You demand a case.

I make it.

You complain that "it doesn't work that way".

You're a hysterical crackho...

Blackvegetable » 6 minutes ago » wrote: ↑

6 minutes ago

I'm not the one running from my words, quoted verbatim, because they weren't presented to me in a specific format.

You demand a case.

I make it.

You complain that "it doesn't work that way".

You're a hysterical crackho...

 

You have non presented my words showing THREE DIVERGENT STANCES.  I am only playing by your rules.  I am still standing just before the finish line waiting on you, Mary.

From now on I am gonna give you the narrative version of your words with no links and no case.  

Huey » 10 minutes ago » wrote: ↑

10 minutes ago

You have non presented my words showing THREE DIVERGENT STANCES. 

I have...

You keep lying.


At this point you should post your stance.

Blackvegetable » 14 minutes ago » wrote: ↑

14 minutes ago

I have...

You keep lying.


At this point you should post your stance.

 

Waiting...

If you did not post these words:



1.  I have posted that he has to end it by either bombing the **** out of legit military targets or just stop.

2.  Umm, so Iran not only has ICBMs that can read Europe but is/was couple weeks of enough fissile material for one bomb, combined with the fact that have recently killed tens of thousands of their own citizens for protesting and there are those who oppose taking them down?

3.  I was on the fence about this when it started the more I learn the more I think I support it. ...

And then you have the Yosemite Sam meme.  I guess you didn't get Looney Tunes in Sweden if I have to explain.

Again, since you are a liar, I just did your work for you.  Please explain what I divirgent about it.

Huey » 7 minutes ago » wrote: ↑

7 minutes ago

Waiting...

If you did not post these words:

1.  I have posted that he has to end it by either bombing the **** out of legit military targets or just stop.

2.  Umm, so Iran not only has ICBMs that can read Europe but is/was couple weeks of enough fissile material for one bomb, combined with the fact that have recently killed tens of thousands of their own citizens for protesting and there are those who oppose taking them down?

3.  I was on the fence about this when it started the more I learn the more I think I support it. ...

And then you have the Yosemite Sam meme.  I guess you didn't get Looney Tunes in Sweden if I have to explain.

Again, since you are a liar, I just did your work for you.  Please explain what I divirgent about it.

1. Posted

2. That, or something very similar, also posted.

3. That is in DIRECT conflict with your vote in Nov 2024.

And then you have the Yosemite Sam meme.  I guess you didn't get Looney Tunes in Sweden if I have to explain.

 That STILL doesn't make your intent clear.
 

Blackvegetable » 13 minutes ago » wrote: ↑

13 minutes ago

1. Posted

2. That, or something very similar, also posted.

3. That is in DIRECT conflict with your vote in Nov 2024.

 That STILL doesn't make your intent clear.

Nope, I have already addressed that with the Ed Koch quote.  SO no, there are not THREE divergent posts.  There are NO divergent posts.

You can now stop lying about that, lying that I ran, and lying that you posted my words.

Please explain what you are not clear about.  Or take your L and sit in the corner.
 
 

Huey » 7 minutes ago » wrote: ↑

7 minutes ago

Nope, I have already addressed that with the Ed Koch quote.

It's not about "addressing" that point, or Ed Koch...it is about admitting your vote and acknowledging that you are in direct conflict with your platform.
 

Huey » 11 Aug 2026, 10:10 am » wrote: ↑

11 Aug 2026, 10:10 am

I have criticized trump often.  More than you ever criticized Biden/Trump combied.  Here is my latest concerning his Yosemite Sam approach to Iran:


Posted that at the forum you are banned from.

Where's the stand?

Blackvegetable » 2 minutes ago » wrote: ↑

2 minutes ago

Where's the stand?

 

You are the only one saying that is a stand. That is a humorous comparison. What don't you understand?  Just think of Obama's line in the sand BS concerning Syria.

Gotcha Puss, you have been "got".
 

Blackvegetable » 9 minutes ago » wrote: ↑

9 minutes ago

It's not about "addressing" that point, or Ed Koch...it is about admitting your vote and acknowledging that you are in direct conflict with your platform.
 

 

Ed Koch.  If you agree with me on 9 out 0f 12 issues, vote for me.  If you agree with me on 12 of 12 issues, seek psychiatric help.

Dum Dum, that means many people, unlike you, do not support all issues those they vote for support.  I find it sickening that you support every thing that Obama, Biden, and Harris supported.  Get help.

Dude, you got your *** kicked so thoroughly you are now making **** up.

Huey » 3 minutes ago » wrote: ↑

3 minutes ago

Ed Koch.  If you agree with me on 9 out 0f 12 issues, vote for me.  If you agree with me on 12 of 12 issues, seek psychiatric help.

Dum Dum, that means many people, unlike you, do not support all issues those they vote for support.  I find it sickening that you support every thing that Obama, Biden, and Harris supported.  Get help.

Dude, you got your *** kicked so thoroughly you are now making **** up.

Dum Dum, that means many people, unlike you, do not support all issues those they vote for support

why do you believe I do?

Huey » 6 minutes ago » wrote: ↑

6 minutes ago

You are the only one saying that is a stand. That is a humorous comparison. What don't you understand?  Just think of Obama's line in the sand BS concerning Syria.

Gotcha Puss, you have been "got".

Huey » 11 Aug 2026, 11:10 am » wrote: ↑


I have criticized trump often. More than you ever criticized Biden/Trump combied. Here is my latest concerning his Yosemite Sam approach to Iran:

Are these your words?