Liberal Forum

Blackvegetable » 12 Jul 2026, 10:40 am » wrote: ↑

12 Jul 2026, 10:40 am

Huey » 12 Jul 2026, 10:36 am » wrote: ↑

12 Jul 2026, 10:36 am

You still can't bring yourself to criticize Platner or the Dems.  You are still a ******.

Tiny,

I don't care about Planter...I  doubt you can find me making reference to him more than twice...

You, on the other hand, are a consistent Grifter apologist....even denying the results of legal procedures intended to establish facts.
 

 

I also criticize Trump.  You  support Nazis. racist and those who support political violence.  

You are a POS and I would say so to your face and you won't do **** about it.

Huey » 12 Jul 2026, 10:44 am » wrote: ↑

12 Jul 2026, 10:44 am

I also criticize Trump.  You  support Nazis. racist and those who support political violence.  


 

You reject judicial findings and cast doubt on the integrity of General Kelly....in service of a rapist pedo felon.
 

Huey » 12 Jul 2026, 10:44 am » wrote: ↑

12 Jul 2026, 10:44 am

Blackvegetable » 12 Jul 2026, 10:40 am » wrote: ↑

12 Jul 2026, 10:40 am

Huey » 12 Jul 2026, 10:36 am » wrote: ↑

12 Jul 2026, 10:36 am

You still can't bring yourself to criticize Platner or the Dems.  You are still a ******.

Tiny,

I don't care about Planter...I  doubt you can find me making reference to him more than twice...

You, on the other hand, are a consistent Grifter apologist....even denying the results of legal procedures intended to establish facts.
 


 

I also criticize Trump.  You  support Nazis. racist and those who support political violence.  

You are a POS and I would say so to your face and you won't do **** about it.

 

 

Blackvegetable » 12 Jul 2026, 10:46 am » wrote: ↑

12 Jul 2026, 10:46 am

Huey » 12 Jul 2026, 10:44 am » wrote: ↑

12 Jul 2026, 10:44 am

I also criticize Trump.  You  support Nazis. racist and those who support political violence.  



 

You reject judicial findings and cast doubt on the integrity of General Kelly....in service of a rapist pedo felon.
 

 

I don't reject judicial findings.  If Kelly wan't speaking out against trump, if he was supporting him, you would be questioning his integrity.

The fact of the matter on this thread is you simply refuse to criticize Platner or the party that supported him.  Don't you dare to presume to lecture me, POS.
 

Huey » 12 Jul 2026, 10:51 am » wrote: ↑

12 Jul 2026, 10:51 am

I don't reject judicial findings.  If Kelly wan't speaking out against trump, if he was supporting him, you would be questioning his integrity.

The fact of the matter on this thread is you simply refuse to criticize Platner or the party that supported him.  Don't you dare to presume to lecture me, POS.

Judge clarifies: Yes, Trump was found to have raped E. Jean Carroll

Huey » 12 Jul 2026, 10:51 am » wrote: ↑

12 Jul 2026, 10:51 am

I don't reject judicial findings.  If Kelly wan't speaking out against trump, if he was supporting him, you would be questioning his integrity.

The fact of the matter on this thread is you simply refuse to criticize Platner or the party that supported him.  Don't you dare to presume to lecture me, POS.

 If Kelly wan't speaking out against trump, if he was supporting him, you would be questioning his integrity.

Why do you presume to question Kelly's integrity? 

Blackvegetable » 12 Jul 2026, 10:54 am » wrote: ↑

12 Jul 2026, 10:54 am

Huey » 12 Jul 2026, 10:51 am » wrote: ↑

12 Jul 2026, 10:51 am

I don't reject judicial findings.  If Kelly wan't speaking out against trump, if he was supporting him, you would be questioning his integrity.

The fact of the matter on this thread is you simply refuse to criticize Platner or the party that supported him.  Don't you dare to presume to lecture me, POS.

Judge clarifies: Yes, Trump was found to have raped E. Jean Carroll

 

 

Blackvegetable » 12 Jul 2026, 10:55 am » wrote: ↑

12 Jul 2026, 10:55 am

Huey » 12 Jul 2026, 10:51 am » wrote: ↑

12 Jul 2026, 10:51 am

I don't reject judicial findings.  If Kelly wan't speaking out against trump, if he was supporting him, you would be questioning his integrity.

The fact of the matter on this thread is you simply refuse to criticize Platner or the party that supported him.  Don't you dare to presume to lecture me, POS.

 If Kelly wan't speaking out against trump, if he was supporting him, you would be questioning his integrity.

Why do you presume to question Kelly's integrity? 

 

And still no criticism of dems who supported a Nazi Loving racist who supports political violence.  And tell us, ******, what happened to believe all women and the #metoo movement.

You are a **** idiot.

Huey » 12 Jul 2026, 10:59 am » wrote: ↑

12 Jul 2026, 10:59 am

And still no criticism of dems who supported a Nazi Loving racist who supports political violence.  And tell us, ******, what happened to believe all women and the #metoo movement.

You are a **** idiot.

Tiny,

Why do you question judges and General Kelly in defense  of a Nazi loving rapist felon?
 

Blackvegetable » 12 Jul 2026, 11:30 am » wrote: ↑

12 Jul 2026, 11:30 am

Huey » 12 Jul 2026, 10:59 am » wrote: ↑

12 Jul 2026, 10:59 am

And still no criticism of dems who supported a Nazi Loving racist who supports political violence.  And tell us, ******, what happened to believe all women and the #metoo movement.

You are a **** idiot.

Tiny,

Why do you question judges and General Kelly in defense  of a Nazi loving rapist felon?
 

 

We will get to your diversion AFTER you condemn the dems who supported Platner knowing the things I posted.  Are you a ****** or are you o the road to becoming a man?

Too this point not one person from either side recalls you EVAH condemning or criticizing anything democrat.

 

Blackvegetable » 12 Jul 2026, 10:31 am » wrote: ↑

12 Jul 2026, 10:31 am

Judge clarifies: Yes, Trump was found to have raped E. Jean Carroll

"Clarifies"?? You mean OFFERS HIS PERSONAL OPINION that DID NOT OVERRULE THE JURY VERDICT OF NOT GUILTIY ON THE RAPE COUNT!!!

Tell us how much it cost ABC and Stephypoopolous when they made the RAPE claim!!!

See, this *** KICKING you get is sooooo **** easy to administer!!

Chase me now, ****!!

Huey » 12 Jul 2026, 11:36 am » wrote: ↑

12 Jul 2026, 11:36 am

We will get to your diversion AFTER you 

@*TinyWelshy, please..
 

Beekeeper » 12 Jul 2026, 11:46 am » wrote: ↑

12 Jul 2026, 11:46 am

"Clarifies"?? You mean OFFERS HIS PERSONAL OPINION 

No...

He offers the LEGAL opinion of the court.

Blackvegetable » 12 Jul 2026, 12:29 pm » wrote: ↑

12 Jul 2026, 12:29 pm

No...

He offers the LEGAL opinion of the court.

Read it CAREFULLY, pumpkin.

HE SAID PLAINLY that the JURY FOUND NO RAPE OCCURRED UNDER NY STATE PENAL CODE!!

PERIOD!! That's all that counts.

He NEVER nullified ANY JURY VERDICT. Because he DISAGREES with it, doesn't change the FACT that Trump was found NOT GUILITY OF THE RAPE ALLEGATION. PERIOD!!!

Beekeeper » 12 Jul 2026, 12:32 pm » wrote: ↑

12 Jul 2026, 12:32 pm

Read it CAREFULLY, pumpkin.

 

"167"


:rofl:  

Of what consequence is a finding relative to CRIMINAL code in a CIVIL proceeding? 

Huey » 12 Jul 2026, 11:36 am » wrote: ↑

12 Jul 2026, 11:36 am

Blackvegetable » 12 Jul 2026, 11:30 am » wrote: ↑

12 Jul 2026, 11:30 am

Huey » 12 Jul 2026, 10:59 am » wrote: ↑

12 Jul 2026, 10:59 am

And still no criticism of dems who supported a Nazi Loving racist who supports political violence.  And tell us, ******, what happened to believe all women and the #metoo movement.

You are a **** idiot.

Tiny,

Why do you question judges and General Kelly in defense  of a Nazi loving rapist felon?
 


 

We will get to your diversion AFTER you condemn the dems who supported Platner knowing the things I posted.  Are you a ****** or are you o the road to becoming a man?

Too this point not one person from either side recalls you EVAH condemning or criticizing anything democrat.

 

 

 

Blackvegetable » 12 Jul 2026, 12:29 pm » wrote: ↑

12 Jul 2026, 12:29 pm

Huey » 12 Jul 2026, 11:36 am » wrote: ↑

12 Jul 2026, 11:36 am

We will get to your diversion AFTER you 

@*TinyWelshy, please..
 

 

Gotta make sure you see the entire post so later on you can't whine I did not post something, ******.  I take it by your refusal to criticize Platner and the Dems that supported him means you support their actions.

Good to know.

Blackvegetable » 12 Jul 2026, 12:39 pm » wrote: ↑

12 Jul 2026, 12:39 pm

"167"

 

Of what consequence is a finding relative to CRIMINAL code in a CIVIL proceeding?

ACCORDING to NY State law, DEFINITIONS in Criminal Code are VALID AND USED in CIVIL PROCEDINGS, cupcake!!

Damn, your legal knowledge is piss poor as everything ELSE you think you know is.

OH WAIT!! YOU had a QUESTION ANSWERED that kicked your **** ***, huh, pumpkin.

You gonna be okay now?? Bloody *** and all!!

Beekeeper » 12 Jul 2026, 2:13 pm » wrote: ↑

12 Jul 2026, 2:13 pm

ACCORDING to NY State law, DEFINITIONS in Criminal Code are VALID AND USED in CIVIL PROCEDINGS, cupcake!!

Damn, your legal knowledge is piss poor as everything ELSE you think you know is.

OH WAIT!! YOU had a QUESTION ANSWERED that kicked your **** ***, huh, pumpkin.

You gonna be okay now?? Bloody *** and all!!

Plus. Kaplan instructed the Jury to use the NY Law's specific legal definition of rape.


AI OverviewYes, in the E. Jean Carroll civil lawsuit, U.S. District Judge Lewis Kaplan instructed the jury to apply the New York Penal Law’s specific legal definition of rape, which required penile penetration

@Blackvegetable  

Huey » 12 Jul 2026, 2:21 pm » wrote: ↑

12 Jul 2026, 2:21 pm

Plus. Kaplan instructed the Jury to use the NY Law's specific legal definition of rape.


 

No....that's nonsense....

Team Grifty requested it....in an effort to dodge the box Grifty was in.

To demonstrate its irrelevance, tell everyone what difference a "yes" would have made.

Beekeeper » 12 Jul 2026, 2:13 pm » wrote: ↑

12 Jul 2026, 2:13 pm

ACCORDING to NY State law, DEFINITIONS in Criminal Code are VALID AND USED in CIVIL PROCEDINGS, cupcake!!


 

Where are you getting this ****?


Had they answered "yes", would Grifty have gone to jail?

Huey » 12 Jul 2026, 2:21 pm » wrote: ↑

12 Jul 2026, 2:21 pm

Beekeeper » 12 Jul 2026, 2:13 pm » wrote: ↑

12 Jul 2026, 2:13 pm

ACCORDING to NY State law, DEFINITIONS in Criminal Code are VALID AND USED in CIVIL PROCEDINGS, cupcake!!

Damn, your legal knowledge is piss poor as everything ELSE you think you know is.

OH WAIT!! YOU had a QUESTION ANSWERED that kicked your **** ***, huh, pumpkin.

You gonna be okay now?? Bloody *** and all!!

Plus. Kaplan instructed the Jury to use the NY Law's specific legal definition of rape.


AI OverviewYes, in the E. Jean Carroll civil lawsuit, U.S. District Judge Lewis Kaplan instructed the jury to apply the New York Penal Law’s specific legal definition of rape, which required penile penetration

@Blackvegetable  

 

 

Blackvegetable » 12 Jul 2026, 2:29 pm » wrote: ↑

12 Jul 2026, 2:29 pm

Huey » 12 Jul 2026, 2:21 pm » wrote: ↑

12 Jul 2026, 2:21 pm

Plus. Kaplan instructed the Jury to use the NY Law's specific legal definition of rape.



 

No....that's nonsense....

Team Grifty requested it....in an effort to dodge the box Grifty was in.

To demonstrate its irrelevance, tell everyone what difference a "yes" would have made.

 

Just to be clear your position is that Kaplan DID NOT instruct the Jury to use the legal definition?

 

Huey » 12 Jul 2026, 2:32 pm » wrote: ↑

12 Jul 2026, 2:32 pm

Just to be clear your position is that Kaplan DID NOT instruct the Jury to use the legal definition?

Only in the context of the finding, obviously.