Inconvenience tax. 3 weeks in the water cooler room. Your **** memory will never be my problem.
Which of the following is the best example of shifting the burden of proof?Blackvegetable » 15 Jul 2026, 5:43 am » wrote: ↑![]()
The minute you answer, the "debate is over...
The Colt AR-15 is a product line of magazine-fed, gas-operated, autoloading rifles manufactured by Colt's Manufacturing Company ("Colt") in many configurations.[1] The rifle is a derivative of its predecessor, the lightweight ArmaLite AR-15, an automatic rifle designed by Eugene Stoner and other engineers at ArmaLite in 1956.
duh.
Do you see the bold part? That was my claim. The second half of it? That is not a claim.you are making a "survivorship bias" fallacy. And **** you if you think I am going to define that for you. "
E..Vegas » 19 Jul 2026, 3:39 pm » wrote: ↑ Which of the following is the best example of shifting the burden of proof?
A. Making a claim and then providing evidence to support it.
B. Asking someone to clarify what they mean before responding.
C. Copying a claim from the internet, refusing to defend it, and then demanding that everyone else prove it wrong.
D. Changing your opinion after better evidence is presented.
Do you see the bold part? That was my claim. The second half of it? That is not a claim.you are making a "survivorship bias" fallacy. And **** you if you think I am going to define that for you. "
Still E.Vegas » 19 Jul 2026, 3:45 pm » wrote: ↑ Which of the following is the best example of shifting the burden of proof?
Do you see the bold part? That was my claim. The second half of it? That is not a claim.you are making a "survivorship bias" fallacy. And **** you if you think I am going to define that for you. "
Here's anotherVegas » 19 Jul 2026, 3:47 pm » wrote: ↑ Which of the following is the best example of shifting the burden of proof?
Ummmmmm....yeah, that is what this whole question is about you dumb mother ****. Stop stalking. God man. Can't you ever just come up with your own ****?Blackvegetable » 19 Jul 2026, 4:06 pm » wrote: ↑ Here's another
Challenge: If you prove me wrong about the following three claims about your OPs:
1. You habitually provide no intelligent thoughts of your own and copy/paste.
2. You habitually refuse to defend your own OPs and evade questions
3. You habitually turn your OPs on everyone else and demand that they answer your questions, while ignoring theirs.
Stakes: If you cannot prove me wrong, then you take off a month. If you can, then I am banned permanently.
Do you see the bold part? That was my claim. The second half of it? That is not a claim.you are making a "survivorship bias" fallacy. And **** you if you think I am going to define that for you. "
Vegas » 19 Jul 2026, 4:08 pm » wrote: ↑ Ummmmmm....yeah, that is what this whole question is about you dumb mother ****. Stop stalking. God man. Can't you ever just come up with your own ****?
Yes....which proves that I have been trying to get you to defend your own OPs for years.
Do you see the bold part? That was my claim. The second half of it? That is not a claim.you are making a "survivorship bias" fallacy. And **** you if you think I am going to define that for you. "
It proves that you are constantly shifting the burden of proof.Vegas » 19 Jul 2026, 4:24 pm » wrote: ↑ Yes....which proves that I have been trying to get you to defend your own OPs for years.
Blackvegetable » 19 Jul 2026, 4:50 pm » wrote: ↑ It proves that you are constantly shifting the burden of proof.
Do you see the bold part? That was my claim. The second half of it? That is not a claim.you are making a "survivorship bias" fallacy. And **** you if you think I am going to define that for you. "
Where did you "prove" this "claim"?Vegas » 19 Jul 2026, 4:55 pm » wrote: ↑![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
The projection. Oh my God.
![]()
Ok...enough of your stalling. From here on out and I am going to spam the **** of you until you answer. Just like last time.
@Deezer Shoove Veghead is going to tag you anyway, so let's save time.
Which of the following is the best example of shifting the burden of proof?
A. Making a claim and then providing evidence to support it.
B. Asking someone to clarify what they mean before responding.
C. Copying a claim from the internet, refusing to defend it, and then demanding that everyone else prove it wrong.
D. Changing your opinion after better evidence is presented.
I am going to paste the following along with the question. It just saves time.
Do you see the bold part? That was my claim. The second half of it? That is not a claim.
I did my job and proved my claim. I gave you links and supported my thesis...which you ran from. That second part? I am under no obligation to go over vocab with you. That is a term that anyone who claims to have knowledge of statistics should know. Your ignorance of basic vocab is not my duty to rectify. That is on you.
why are you such a vacuously tedious bastard? **** cretin…
JuCo 5 percenter...72
“Show me the man and I’ll find you the crime” ~ LAVRENTIY BERIA
"Try to get past your passionate ignorance and learn to accept what actually happened." ~ brown's unheeded words of wisdom Inconvenience tax. Pay up., welchy.
Do you see the bold part? That was my claim. The second half of it? That is not a claim.you are making a "survivorship bias" fallacy. And **** you if you think I am going to define that for you. "
Everyone knows you can stalk. We got it. The problem for you is that not once has copying post ever been a mic drop for you. Not one zinger.
Nobody knows what you mean by "stalk"...