Here they areZeets2 » 15 Jul 2026, 10:40 am » wrote: ↑ I'm not the one who's so gullible to happily swallow the leftwing **** coming out a liberal rag which you KNOW hates Trump and hates Jews, and made such a huge idiot out of you for learning nothing after their continued lies have been exposed:
You'd get about as much honesty out of a Roadrunner cartoon that has you believe a two-legged roadrunner can outrun a 4 legged coyote, which you were no doubt just as ignorant to swallow, and your level of intelligence hasn't increased a whit since you accepted that at age 5!
The little darling is right, zeke.
He's the kind of guy who has a structured settlement and he needs cash now, but he's too stupid to call J.G. Wentworth at 877-cash-now.
It's entirely factrein
Define it yourself. **** your demands.Blackvegetable » Yesterday, 1:18 pm » wrote: ↑ Nobody knows what you mean by "stalk"...
Your behavior has rendered orthodox meanings inoperable...
Do you see the bold part? That was my claim. The second half of it? That is not a claim.you are making a "survivorship bias" fallacy. And **** you if you think I am going to define that for you. "
Vegas » Yesterday, 5:09 pm » wrote: ↑
Which of the following is the best example of shifting the burden of proof?
Define it yourself. **** your demands.
Copies me. Thereby, once again, admitting that he has know thoughts of his own.
Do you see the bold part? That was my claim. The second half of it? That is not a claim.you are making a "survivorship bias" fallacy. And **** you if you think I am going to define that for you. "
Blackvegetable » 15 Jul 2026, 5:43 am » wrote: ↑ Trump retreats from shipping toll in Strait of Hormuz
As European markets fell and oil prices hit a one-month high, President Donald Trump declared on Truth Social that the strait “is open to ALL Ship traffic except for Iran.”
https://www.washingtonpost.com/world/20 ... it-hormuz/
He's such a **** idiot.
Do you see the bold part? That was my claim. The second half of it? That is not a claim.you are making a "survivorship bias" fallacy. And **** you if you think I am going to define that for you. "
Which of the following is the best example of shifting the burden of proof?
Do you see the bold part? That was my claim. The second half of it? That is not a claim.you are making a "survivorship bias" fallacy. And **** you if you think I am going to define that for you. "
Do you see the bold part? That was my claim. The second half of it? That is not a claim.you are making a "survivorship bias" fallacy. And **** you if you think I am going to define that for you. "
Speaking of you running, check this out:
Do you see the bold part? That was my claim. The second half of it? That is not a claim.you are making a "survivorship bias" fallacy. And **** you if you think I am going to define that for you. "
@Deezer ShooveVegas » Yesterday, 5:18 pm » wrote: ↑ Which of the following is the best example of shifting the burden of proof?
Hiding again. Hence, the purpose of this:Blackvegetable » 16 Jul 2026, 6:46 pm » wrote: ↑ Are you angry because people don't give a **** about Grifty?
Do you see the bold part? That was my claim. The second half of it? That is not a claim.you are making a "survivorship bias" fallacy. And **** you if you think I am going to define that for you. "
Vegas » Yesterday, 5:19 pm » wrote: ↑ Which of the following is the best example of shifting the burden of proof?
Which of the following is the best example of shifting the burden of proof?
Do you see the bold part? That was my claim. The second half of it? That is not a claim.you are making a "survivorship bias" fallacy. And **** you if you think I am going to define that for you. "
Define it yourself. **** your demands.Vegas » Yesterday, 5:21 pm » wrote: ↑ Hiding again. Hence, the purpose of this:
Which of the following is the best example of shifting the burden of proof?
Do you see the bold part? That was my claim. The second half of it? That is not a claim.you are making a "survivorship bias" fallacy. And **** you if you think I am going to define that for you. "
Hiding again. Hence, the purpose of this:
Do you see the bold part? That was my claim. The second half of it? That is not a claim.you are making a "survivorship bias" fallacy. And **** you if you think I am going to define that for you. "
Copies me. Once again, admitting that he has no thoughts of his own.
Do you see the bold part? That was my claim. The second half of it? That is not a claim.you are making a "survivorship bias" fallacy. And **** you if you think I am going to define that for you. "
Copies me. Once again, admitting that he has no thoughts of his own.
Do you see the bold part? That was my claim. The second half of it? That is not a claim.you are making a "survivorship bias" fallacy. And **** you if you think I am going to define that for you. "