Liberal Forum

Blackvegetable » 4 minutes ago » wrote: ↑

4 minutes ago

My bad..

Do you feel better now?

The single most important thing here is how YOU feel.

DeezerShoove » 7 minutes ago » wrote: ↑

7 minutes ago

The single most important thing here is how YOU feel.

I guess I misunderstood your question. 


Clearly not my day..

So, what are your thoughts on the OP?

Squatchman » 7 minutes ago » wrote: ↑

7 minutes ago

  Especially if my dog lays eyes on him.

someone said he is 615 and I looked that person up and he claimed to be a wallboard installer. I told @FJB  
”the best job you ever had was installing wallboard”
and he admitted it. 

Dumb  
 
 

*Roshambo » 5 minutes ago » wrote: ↑

5 minutes ago

someone said he is 615 and I looked that person up and he claimed to be a wallboard installer. I told @FJB  
”the best job you ever had was installing wallboard”
and he admitted it. 

Dumb

  Yeah,he's duck from .org. 
He was the room idiot there too.
 

Blackvegetable » Today, 7:38 am » wrote: ↑

Today, 7:38 am

I guess I misunderstood your question. 

Clearly not my day..

So, what are your thoughts on the OP?

You first.
 

DeezerShoove » 10 minutes ago » wrote: ↑

10 minutes ago

You first.

viewtopic.php?p=2908819#p2908819


 

Blackvegetable » Today, 3:31 pm » wrote: ↑

Today, 3:31 pm

viewtopic.php?p=2908819#p2908819

Which of the following is the best example of shifting the burden of proof?

 A. Making a claim and then providing evidence to support it.
B. Asking someone to clarify what they mean before responding.
C. Copying a claim from the internet, refusing to defend it, and then demanding that everyone else prove it wrong.
D. Changing your opinion after better evidence is presented.



I am going to paste the following along with the question. It just saves time. 

 you are making a "survivorship bias" fallacy. And **** you if you think I am going to define that for you. "

Do you see the bold part? That was my claim. The second half of it? That is not a claim. 

I did my job and proved my claim. I gave you links and supported my thesis...which you ran from. That second part? I am under no obligation to go over vocab with you. That is a term that anyone who claims to have knowledge of statistics should know. Your ignorance of basic vocab is not my duty to rectify. That is on you. 

Blackvegetable » Today, 3:31 pm » wrote: ↑

Today, 3:31 pm

viewtopic.php?p=2908819#p2908819

Didn't click on it. Don't care to play your simple-minded games.

DeezerShoove » 12 minutes ago » wrote: ↑

12 minutes ago

Didn't click on it. Don't care to play your simple-minded games.

Coozie,

You know I don't play games.

I just crush a lot.
 

DeezerShoove » 57 minutes ago » wrote: ↑

57 minutes ago

Didn't click on it. Don't care to play your simple-minded games.

What do you care about?

You seem to just ride the conservative  train in blindness
 

JohnnyYou » Today, 6:44 pm » wrote: ↑

Today, 6:44 pm

What do you care about?

You seem to just ride the conservative  train in blindness

I care deeply about your every post.

Feel better?

Blackvegetable » Today, 5:59 pm » wrote: ↑

Today, 5:59 pm

Coozie,

You know I don't play games.

I just crush a lot.

You're a **** troll that posts **** questions.
Argue that all you want but it'll still be true.  

DeezerShoove » Yesterday, 10:16 pm » wrote: ↑

Yesterday, 10:16 pm

I care deeply about your every post.

Feel better?

I think your motive is ad revenue 

https://i.postimg.cc/fyctc6xs/Screensho ... Chrome.jpg
 

DeezerShoove » Yesterday, 10:16 pm » wrote: ↑

Yesterday, 10:16 pm

I care deeply about your every post.

Feel better?

 I Knew It!!!
You're a regular Dr. Phil.
 

Squatchman » Yesterday, 11:51 pm » wrote: ↑

Yesterday, 11:51 pm

 I Knew It!!!
You're a regular Dr. Phil.

LMAO

Squatchman » Yesterday, 11:51 pm » wrote: ↑

Yesterday, 11:51 pm

 I Knew It!!!
You're a regular Dr. Phil.

Thanks for noticing.

DeezerShoove » 21 Jul 2026, 10:18 pm » wrote: ↑

21 Jul 2026, 10:18 pm

You're a **** troll that posts **** questions.
Argue that all you want but it'll still be true.

Wouldn't the "****" be those who run from them?

Blackvegetable » 17 minutes ago » wrote: ↑

17 minutes ago

Wouldn't the "****" be those who run from them?

No.
Why do you phrase nearly all of your responses as a question?

Your above reply could have been a statement.
Instead you're so afraid that you instantly shed any marginal perch on taking a stand as an automatic reflex.

So...
Why do you phrase nearly all of your responses as a question?  (Hint: prove your stuff right now).
 

DeezerShoove » 33 minutes ago » wrote: ↑

33 minutes ago

No.
Why do you phrase nearly all of your responses as a question?

Your above reply could have been a statement.
Instead you're so afraid that you instantly shed any marginal perch on taking a stand as an automatic reflex.

So...
Why do you phrase nearly all of your responses as a question?  (Hint: prove your stuff right now).

That's a good question, Coozie....

I'll be happy to answer it with your pledge that you will,.immediately thereafter, post your position on questions.

Blackvegetable » 8 minutes ago » wrote: ↑

8 minutes ago

That's a good question, Coozie....

I'll be happy to answer it with your pledge that you will,.immediately thereafter, post your position on questions.

Always strings attached. Precious.  
If it's an honest answer I'll give you an honest position.