Liberal Forum

*Roshambo » Yesterday, 5:45 am » wrote: ↑

Yesterday, 5:45 am

Tell the "creator" of you graphic, technically, they are incorrect.

• AR-15: Approximately 45 rounds per minute (RPM).

• Ruger Mini-14: Approximately 40 rounds per minute (RPM).

nobody's gonna want to waddle into the Kum&Go toting a varmint rifle.

Cannonpointer » 19 Jul 2026, 8:44 pm » wrote: ↑

19 Jul 2026, 8:44 pm

Point to the question.

You seem particularly upset. More than the usual panic.

You spotting? Cramping? Where are we on our cycle, Petunia?

5 tearful paragraphs of whine...
 

*Roshambo » Yesterday, 5:45 am » wrote: ↑

Yesterday, 5:45 am

Huey » 19 Jul 2026, 9:05 am » wrote: ↑

19 Jul 2026, 9:05 am

Just to solidify how ignorant you are:



You have been fooled because you are not that smart.

Tell the "creator" of you graphic, technically, they are incorrect.

• AR-15: Approximately 45 rounds per minute (RPM).

• Ruger Mini-14: Approximately 40 rounds per minute (RPM).

It that is the best you can come up with, anal one, lets compare apples to apples.  Below are sugar min 14s.  one will be legal and one won't 

Do you see @Blackvegetable  ?

 

Huey » Yesterday, 8:10 am » wrote: ↑

Yesterday, 8:10 am

It that is the best you can come up with, anal one.
Do you see @Blackvegetable  ?

Run,, Coward.

You know you want to.

Blackvegetable » Yesterday, 8:11 am » wrote: ↑

Yesterday, 8:11 am

Huey » Yesterday, 8:10 am » wrote: ↑

Yesterday, 8:10 am

It that is the best you can come up with, anal one.
Do you see @Blackvegetable  ?

Run,, Coward.

You know you want to.

 

There is nothing to run from, Psycho Stalker.  I notice to make your point you have to dishonestly edit the post and run from the part that make you look like and ***.

You want to ban weapons based solely on appearance.

This is the same weapon:

 

Huey » Yesterday, 8:14 am » wrote: ↑

Yesterday, 8:14 am

There is nothing to run from, Psycho Stalker.  I notice to make your point you have to dishonestly edit the post and run from the part that make you look like and ***.

You want to ban weapons based solely on appearance.

This is the same weapon:

 

You want to ban weapons based solely on appearance

Show me saying that.

Blackvegetable » Yesterday, 8:23 am » wrote: ↑

Yesterday, 8:23 am

Huey » Yesterday, 8:14 am » wrote: ↑

Yesterday, 8:14 am

There is nothing to run from, Psycho Stalker.  I notice to make your point you have to dishonestly edit the post and run from the part that make you look like and ***.

You want to ban weapons based solely on appearance.

This is the same weapon:

You want to ban weapons based solely on appearance

Show me saying that.

 

That's ok.  Just tell us why the second rifle should be banned.  And then you win.  Remember, it is the same weapon internally and operates the same.

Huey » Yesterday, 8:26 am » wrote: ↑

Yesterday, 8:26 am

That's ok.  

No...it's not "ok".


You need to stop lying.

Huey » Yesterday, 8:10 am » wrote: ↑

Yesterday, 8:10 am

It that is the best you can come up with, anal one, lets compare apples to apples.  Below are sugar min 14s.  one will be legal and one won't 

Do you see @Blackvegetable  ?

Try to use technically accurate information if possible.
Acknowledge the error, no deflection. 
Nod

Blackvegetable » Yesterday, 8:34 am » wrote: ↑

Yesterday, 8:34 am

Huey » Yesterday, 8:26 am » wrote: ↑

Yesterday, 8:26 am

That's ok.  

No...it's not "ok".


You need to stop lying.

 

 

Huey » Yesterday, 8:26 am » wrote: ↑

Yesterday, 8:26 am

Blackvegetable » Yesterday, 8:23 am » wrote: ↑

Yesterday, 8:23 am

Huey » Yesterday, 8:14 am » wrote: ↑

Yesterday, 8:14 am

There is nothing to run from, Psycho Stalker.  I notice to make your point you have to dishonestly edit the post and run from the part that make you look like and ***.

You want to ban weapons based solely on appearance.

This is the same weapon:

You want to ban weapons based solely on appearance

Show me saying that.


 

That's ok.  Just tell us why the second rifle should be banned.  And then you win.  Remember, it is the same weapon internally and operates the same.

 

If I am lying Puss, just tell us why the second rifle should be banned.  And you prove I am lying.  Remember, all of the various bans you ignorantly clamor for are all based on appearance, not function.

Prove I am lying, Puss.

Huey » Yesterday, 8:37 am » wrote: ↑

Yesterday, 8:37 am

If I am lying Puss, just tell us 

I don't need to do anything....you need to post my words.

*Roshambo » Yesterday, 8:35 am » wrote: ↑

Yesterday, 8:35 am

Huey » Yesterday, 8:10 am » wrote: ↑

Yesterday, 8:10 am

It that is the best you can come up with, anal one, lets compare apples to apples.  Below are sugar min 14s.  one will be legal and one won't 

Do you see @Blackvegetable  ?

Try to use technically accurate information if possible.
Acknowledge the error, no deflection. 
Nod

 

Idiot, they are both Ruger Min 14s

https://ruger.com/products/mini14Tactic ... odels.html.  Bottom Right

https://ruger.com/products/mini14RanchRifle/models.html

 

*Roshambo » Yesterday, 8:35 am » wrote: ↑

Yesterday, 8:35 am

Try to use technically accurate information if possible.
Acknowledge the error, no deflection. 
Nod

"Words don't mean what you think they mean." - @*HoooooeyVagina

Huey » Yesterday, 8:37 am » wrote: ↑

Yesterday, 8:37 am

Blackvegetable » Yesterday, 8:34 am » wrote: ↑

Yesterday, 8:34 am

Huey » Yesterday, 8:26 am » wrote: ↑

Yesterday, 8:26 am

That's ok.  

No...it's not "ok".


You need to stop lying.


 

Huey » Yesterday, 8:26 am » wrote: ↑

Yesterday, 8:26 am

Blackvegetable » Yesterday, 8:23 am » wrote: ↑

Yesterday, 8:23 am

Show me saying that.



 

That's ok.  Just tell us why the second rifle should be banned.  And then you win.  Remember, it is the same weapon internally and operates the same.


 

If I am lying Puss, just tell us why the second rifle should be banned.  And you prove I am lying.  Remember, all of the various bans you ignorantly clamor for are all based on appearance, not function.

Prove I am lying, Puss.

 

 

Blackvegetable » Yesterday, 8:39 am » wrote: ↑

Yesterday, 8:39 am

Huey » Yesterday, 8:37 am » wrote: ↑

Yesterday, 8:37 am

If I am lying Puss, just tell us 

I don't need to do anything....you need to post my words.

 

So you don't want the bottom weapon banned.  Ps.  You are being humiliated.

 

Huey » Yesterday, 8:41 am » wrote: ↑

Yesterday, 8:41 am

So you don't 

******,


My words.

Blackvegetable » Yesterday, 8:43 am » wrote: ↑

Yesterday, 8:43 am

Huey » Yesterday, 8:41 am » wrote: ↑

Yesterday, 8:41 am

So you don't 

******,


My words.

 

 

Huey » Yesterday, 8:41 am » wrote: ↑

Yesterday, 8:41 am

Huey » Yesterday, 8:37 am » wrote: ↑

Yesterday, 8:37 am

Blackvegetable » Yesterday, 8:34 am » wrote: ↑

Yesterday, 8:34 am

No...it's not "ok".


You need to stop lying.



 

Huey » Yesterday, 8:26 am » wrote: ↑

Yesterday, 8:26 am

That's ok.  Just tell us why the second rifle should be banned.  And then you win.  Remember, it is the same weapon internally and operates the same.



 

If I am lying Puss, just tell us why the second rifle should be banned.  And you prove I am lying.  Remember, all of the various bans you ignorantly clamor for are all based on appearance, not function.

Prove I am lying, Puss.


 

Blackvegetable » Yesterday, 8:39 am » wrote: ↑

Yesterday, 8:39 am

Huey » Yesterday, 8:37 am » wrote: ↑

Yesterday, 8:37 am

If I am lying Puss, just tell us 

I don't need to do anything....you need to post my words.


 

So you don't want the bottom weapon banned.  Ps.  You are being humiliated.

 

 

Just tell us why the bottom weapon should be banned.  

Huey » Yesterday, 8:47 am » wrote: ↑

Yesterday, 8:47 am

Just tell us why the bottom weapon should be banned.

No...


Post my words, or admit that you lied.


I don't have to do a **** thing 
 

Huey » Yesterday, 8:40 am » wrote: ↑

Yesterday, 8:40 am

Idiot, they are both Ruger Min 14s

https://ruger.com/products/mini14Tactic ... odels.html.  Bottom Right

https://ruger.com/products/mini14RanchRifle/models.html

Idiot IDGAF what they are. Acknowledge the graphic you posted was technically inaccurate. 
No deflecting, keep up, or STFU
 

Blackvegetable » Yesterday, 8:40 am » wrote: ↑

Yesterday, 8:40 am

"Words don't mean what you think they mean." - @*HoooooeyVagina

 
 

Blackvegetable » Yesterday, 8:54 am » wrote: ↑

Yesterday, 8:54 am

Huey » Yesterday, 8:47 am » wrote: ↑

Yesterday, 8:47 am

Just tell us why the bottom weapon should be banned.

No...


Post my words, or admit that you lied.


I don't have to do a **** thing 
 

 

All you have to do is tell us why the bottom rifle should be banned.  And it is over.  Right now you are like every unit gun nutter.  The bans you support are based on appearance.