Liberal Forum

*Roshambo » 20 Jul 2026, 5:45 am » wrote: ↑

20 Jul 2026, 5:45 am

Tell the "creator" of you graphic, technically, they are incorrect.

• AR-15: Approximately 45 rounds per minute (RPM).

• Ruger Mini-14: Approximately 40 rounds per minute (RPM).

Cannonpointer » 19 Jul 2026, 8:44 pm » wrote: ↑

19 Jul 2026, 8:44 pm

Point to the question.

You seem particularly upset. More than the usual panic.

You spotting? Cramping? Where are we on our cycle, Petunia?

*Roshambo » 20 Jul 2026, 5:45 am » wrote: ↑

20 Jul 2026, 5:45 am

Huey » 19 Jul 2026, 9:05 am » wrote: ↑

19 Jul 2026, 9:05 am

Just to solidify how ignorant you are:



You have been fooled because you are not that smart.

Tell the "creator" of you graphic, technically, they are incorrect.

• AR-15: Approximately 45 rounds per minute (RPM).

• Ruger Mini-14: Approximately 40 rounds per minute (RPM).

Huey » 20 Jul 2026, 8:10 am » wrote: ↑

20 Jul 2026, 8:10 am

It that is the best you can come up with, anal one.
Do you see @Blackvegetable  ?

Blackvegetable » 20 Jul 2026, 8:11 am » wrote: ↑

20 Jul 2026, 8:11 am

Huey » 20 Jul 2026, 8:10 am » wrote: ↑

20 Jul 2026, 8:10 am

It that is the best you can come up with, anal one.
Do you see @Blackvegetable  ?

Run,, Coward.

You know you want to.

 

Huey » 20 Jul 2026, 8:14 am » wrote: ↑

20 Jul 2026, 8:14 am

There is nothing to run from, Psycho Stalker.  I notice to make your point you have to dishonestly edit the post and run from the part that make you look like and ***.

You want to ban weapons based solely on appearance.

This is the same weapon:

You want to ban weapons based solely on appearance

Blackvegetable » 20 Jul 2026, 8:23 am » wrote: ↑

20 Jul 2026, 8:23 am

Huey » 20 Jul 2026, 8:14 am » wrote: ↑

20 Jul 2026, 8:14 am

There is nothing to run from, Psycho Stalker.  I notice to make your point you have to dishonestly edit the post and run from the part that make you look like and ***.

You want to ban weapons based solely on appearance.

This is the same weapon:

You want to ban weapons based solely on appearance

Show me saying that.

 

Huey » 20 Jul 2026, 8:26 am » wrote: ↑

20 Jul 2026, 8:26 am

That's ok.  

Huey » 20 Jul 2026, 8:10 am » wrote: ↑

20 Jul 2026, 8:10 am

It that is the best you can come up with, anal one, lets compare apples to apples.  Below are sugar min 14s.  one will be legal and one won't 

Do you see @Blackvegetable  ?

I gave SouthernFried my address and the coward didn't dare to show up. He knows better. He never served, stolen valor.
fried I live rent free in your mind and you are not blocked from messaging me.
**** ******, sleep with both eyes open Your days are numbered and I know who you are

Blackvegetable » 20 Jul 2026, 8:34 am » wrote: ↑

20 Jul 2026, 8:34 am

Huey » 20 Jul 2026, 8:26 am » wrote: ↑

20 Jul 2026, 8:26 am

That's ok.  

No...it's not "ok".


You need to stop lying.

 

Huey » 20 Jul 2026, 8:26 am » wrote: ↑

20 Jul 2026, 8:26 am

Blackvegetable » 20 Jul 2026, 8:23 am » wrote: ↑

20 Jul 2026, 8:23 am

Huey » 20 Jul 2026, 8:14 am » wrote: ↑

20 Jul 2026, 8:14 am

There is nothing to run from, Psycho Stalker.  I notice to make your point you have to dishonestly edit the post and run from the part that make you look like and ***.

You want to ban weapons based solely on appearance.

This is the same weapon:

You want to ban weapons based solely on appearance

Show me saying that.


 

That's ok.  Just tell us why the second rifle should be banned.  And then you win.  Remember, it is the same weapon internally and operates the same.

 

Huey » 20 Jul 2026, 8:37 am » wrote: ↑

20 Jul 2026, 8:37 am

If I am lying Puss, just tell us 

*Roshambo » 20 Jul 2026, 8:35 am » wrote: ↑

20 Jul 2026, 8:35 am

Huey » 20 Jul 2026, 8:10 am » wrote: ↑

20 Jul 2026, 8:10 am

It that is the best you can come up with, anal one, lets compare apples to apples.  Below are sugar min 14s.  one will be legal and one won't 

Do you see @Blackvegetable  ?

Try to use technically accurate information if possible.
Acknowledge the error, no deflection. 
Nod

 

*Roshambo » 20 Jul 2026, 8:35 am » wrote: ↑

20 Jul 2026, 8:35 am

Try to use technically accurate information if possible.
Acknowledge the error, no deflection. 
Nod

Huey » 20 Jul 2026, 8:37 am » wrote: ↑

20 Jul 2026, 8:37 am

Blackvegetable » 20 Jul 2026, 8:34 am » wrote: ↑

20 Jul 2026, 8:34 am

Huey » 20 Jul 2026, 8:26 am » wrote: ↑

20 Jul 2026, 8:26 am

That's ok.  

No...it's not "ok".


You need to stop lying.


 

Huey » 20 Jul 2026, 8:26 am » wrote: ↑

20 Jul 2026, 8:26 am

Blackvegetable » 20 Jul 2026, 8:23 am » wrote: ↑

20 Jul 2026, 8:23 am

Show me saying that.



 

That's ok.  Just tell us why the second rifle should be banned.  And then you win.  Remember, it is the same weapon internally and operates the same.


 

If I am lying Puss, just tell us why the second rifle should be banned.  And you prove I am lying.  Remember, all of the various bans you ignorantly clamor for are all based on appearance, not function.

Prove I am lying, Puss.

 

Blackvegetable » 20 Jul 2026, 8:39 am » wrote: ↑

20 Jul 2026, 8:39 am

Huey » 20 Jul 2026, 8:37 am » wrote: ↑

20 Jul 2026, 8:37 am

If I am lying Puss, just tell us 

I don't need to do anything....you need to post my words.

 

Huey » 20 Jul 2026, 8:41 am » wrote: ↑

20 Jul 2026, 8:41 am

So you don't 

Blackvegetable » 20 Jul 2026, 8:43 am » wrote: ↑

20 Jul 2026, 8:43 am

Huey » 20 Jul 2026, 8:41 am » wrote: ↑

20 Jul 2026, 8:41 am

So you don't 

******,


My words.

 

Huey » 20 Jul 2026, 8:41 am » wrote: ↑

20 Jul 2026, 8:41 am

Huey » 20 Jul 2026, 8:37 am » wrote: ↑

20 Jul 2026, 8:37 am

Blackvegetable » 20 Jul 2026, 8:34 am » wrote: ↑

20 Jul 2026, 8:34 am

No...it's not "ok".


You need to stop lying.



 

Huey » 20 Jul 2026, 8:26 am » wrote: ↑

20 Jul 2026, 8:26 am

That's ok.  Just tell us why the second rifle should be banned.  And then you win.  Remember, it is the same weapon internally and operates the same.



 

If I am lying Puss, just tell us why the second rifle should be banned.  And you prove I am lying.  Remember, all of the various bans you ignorantly clamor for are all based on appearance, not function.

Prove I am lying, Puss.


 

Blackvegetable » 20 Jul 2026, 8:39 am » wrote: ↑

20 Jul 2026, 8:39 am

Huey » 20 Jul 2026, 8:37 am » wrote: ↑

20 Jul 2026, 8:37 am

If I am lying Puss, just tell us 

I don't need to do anything....you need to post my words.


 

So you don't want the bottom weapon banned.  Ps.  You are being humiliated.

 

 

Huey » 20 Jul 2026, 8:47 am » wrote: ↑

20 Jul 2026, 8:47 am

Just tell us why the bottom weapon should be banned.

Huey » 20 Jul 2026, 8:40 am » wrote: ↑

20 Jul 2026, 8:40 am

Idiot, they are both Ruger Min 14s

https://ruger.com/products/mini14Tactic ... odels.html.  Bottom Right

https://ruger.com/products/mini14RanchRifle/models.html

I gave SouthernFried my address and the coward didn't dare to show up. He knows better. He never served, stolen valor.
fried I live rent free in your mind and you are not blocked from messaging me.
**** ******, sleep with both eyes open Your days are numbered and I know who you are

Blackvegetable » 20 Jul 2026, 8:40 am » wrote: ↑

20 Jul 2026, 8:40 am

"Words don't mean what you think they mean." - @*HoooooeyVagina

I gave SouthernFried my address and the coward didn't dare to show up. He knows better. He never served, stolen valor.
fried I live rent free in your mind and you are not blocked from messaging me.
**** ******, sleep with both eyes open Your days are numbered and I know who you are

Blackvegetable » 20 Jul 2026, 8:54 am » wrote: ↑

20 Jul 2026, 8:54 am

Huey » 20 Jul 2026, 8:47 am » wrote: ↑

20 Jul 2026, 8:47 am

Just tell us why the bottom weapon should be banned.

No...


Post my words, or admit that you lied.


I don't have to do a **** thing