Liberal Forum

*Roshambo » Yesterday, 8:54 am » wrote: ↑

Yesterday, 8:54 am

Huey » Yesterday, 8:40 am » wrote: ↑

Yesterday, 8:40 am

Idiot, they are both Ruger Min 14s

https://ruger.com/products/mini14Tactic ... odels.html.  Bottom Right

https://ruger.com/products/mini14RanchRifle/models.html

Idiot IDGAF what they are. Acknowledge the graphic you posted was technically inaccurate. 
No deflecting, keep up, or STFU
 

 

Bitch, I am not deflecting. This is my thread.  Stop being so **** anal, Bitch.

Huey » Yesterday, 8:37 am » wrote: ↑

Yesterday, 8:37 am

If I am lying Puss, just tell us why the second rifle should be banned.  And you prove I am lying.  Remember, all of the various bans you ignorantly clamor for are all based on appearance, not function.

Prove I am lying, Puss.

You are acting immature for a little man with white hair and a doily
 

Huey » Yesterday, 8:58 am » wrote: ↑

Yesterday, 8:58 am

Bitch, I am not deflecting. This is my thread.  Stop being so **** anal, Bitch.

Did you post a graphic with misinformation or not?
 
Words don't mean what you think they mean." - @*HoooooeyVagina

Huey » Yesterday, 8:57 am » wrote: ↑

Yesterday, 8:57 am

All you have to do is 

Wait for you to post my words.

*Roshambo » Yesterday, 8:59 am » wrote: ↑

Yesterday, 8:59 am

Huey » Yesterday, 8:37 am » wrote: ↑

Yesterday, 8:37 am

If I am lying Puss, just tell us why the second rifle should be banned.  And you prove I am lying.  Remember, all of the various bans you ignorantly clamor for are all based on appearance, not function.

Prove I am lying, Puss.

You are acting immature for a little man with white hair and a doily
 

 

LMAO!  Maybe you can explain to your butt buddy that the rifle bans he support are basically for external cosmetic features.  Not internal function.  If you have any honesty and integrity you will do so, Keyboard Komando.

Huey » Yesterday, 8:57 am » wrote: ↑

Yesterday, 8:57 am

Blackvegetable » Yesterday, 8:54 am » wrote: ↑

Yesterday, 8:54 am

Huey » Yesterday, 8:47 am » wrote: ↑

Yesterday, 8:47 am

Just tell us why the bottom weapon should be banned.

No...


Post my words, or admit that you lied.


I don't have to do a **** thing 
 


 

All you have to do is tell us why the bottom rifle should be banned.  And it is over.  Right now you are like every unit gun nutter.  The bans you support are based on appearance.

 

 

Blackvegetable » Yesterday, 9:02 am » wrote: ↑

Yesterday, 9:02 am

Huey » Yesterday, 8:57 am » wrote: ↑

Yesterday, 8:57 am

All you have to do is 

Wait for you to post my words.

 

So now you are saying YOU DO NOT support the bans that are based on external features, not internal function.

Got it.  Pick a stance, Roulette Wheel.
 

Blackvegetable » Yesterday, 9:02 am » wrote: ↑

Yesterday, 9:02 am

Wait for you to post my words.

Has @*HoooooeyVagina posted doily photos lately 
 

Huey » Yesterday, 9:04 am » wrote: ↑

Yesterday, 9:04 am

LMAO!  Maybe you can explain to your butt buddy that the rifle bans he support are basically for external cosmetic features.  Not internal function.  If you have any honesty and integrity you will do so, Keyboard Komando.

Words don't mean what you think they mean." - @*HoooooeyVagina

Owning your mistake is a start.
 

*Roshambo » Yesterday, 9:06 am » wrote: ↑

Yesterday, 9:06 am

Has @*HoooooeyVagina posted doily photos lately 
🤔

Ask him to explain why he didn't cast a 3rd proud vote for 2ndBesty...



It's a riot..

Blackvegetable » Yesterday, 9:07 am » wrote: ↑

Yesterday, 9:07 am

Ask him to explain why he didn't cast a 3rd proud vote for 2ndBesty...

It's a riot..

@Huey  …
 

Huey » Yesterday, 9:06 am » wrote: ↑

Yesterday, 9:06 am

So now 

You will know what I am saying when you post my words...

Blackvegetable » Yesterday, 9:08 am » wrote: ↑

Yesterday, 9:08 am

Huey » Yesterday, 9:06 am » wrote: ↑

Yesterday, 9:06 am

So now 

You will know what I am saying when you post my words...

 

 

Huey » Yesterday, 9:06 am » wrote: ↑

Yesterday, 9:06 am

Huey » Yesterday, 8:57 am » wrote: ↑

Yesterday, 8:57 am

Blackvegetable » Yesterday, 8:54 am » wrote: ↑

Yesterday, 8:54 am

No...


Post my words, or admit that you lied.


I don't have to do a **** thing 
 



 

All you have to do is tell us why the bottom rifle should be banned.  And it is over.  Right now you are like every unit gun nutter.  The bans you support are based on appearance.


 

Blackvegetable » Yesterday, 9:02 am » wrote: ↑

Yesterday, 9:02 am

Huey » Yesterday, 8:57 am » wrote: ↑

Yesterday, 8:57 am

All you have to do is 

Wait for you to post my words.


 

So now you are saying YOU DO NOT support the bans that are based on external features, not internal function.

Got it.  Pick a stance, Roulette Wheel.
 

 

Do you or do you not support the bans on the books and proposed bans?

*Roshambo » Yesterday, 9:08 am » wrote: ↑

Yesterday, 9:08 am

Blackvegetable » Yesterday, 9:07 am » wrote: ↑

Yesterday, 9:07 am

Ask him to explain why he didn't cast a 3rd proud vote for 2ndBesty...

It's a riot..

@Huey  …
 

 

Wrong thread.  Ask him if he support the AR bans on the books or not.

@Blackvegetable  

Huey » Yesterday, 9:15 am » wrote: ↑

Yesterday, 9:15 am

Wrong thread.  Ask him if he support the AR bans on the books or not.

@Blackvegetable

I might do so when you pledge to stop using technically inaccurate graphics.
 
 

*Roshambo » Yesterday, 9:24 am » wrote: ↑

Yesterday, 9:24 am

I might do so when you pledge to stop using technically inaccurate graphics.

You got it.  I will not use graphics that are slightly technically inaccurate.

Your turn.  Tell him.

Huey » Yesterday, 9:26 am » wrote: ↑

Yesterday, 9:26 am

You got it.  I will not use graphics that are slightly technically inaccurate.

Your turn.  Tell him.

Do you understand the word “might”
 

Blackvegetable » Yesterday, 4:22 am » wrote: ↑

Yesterday, 4:22 am

@*TinyQuimmie says that YOU taught him everything about Cowardice...

@you're a ***.

Stop being hysterical. Hire a man to slap you. 

lilbitchmufuga
 

*Roshambo » Yesterday, 9:37 am » wrote: ↑

Yesterday, 9:37 am

Huey » Yesterday, 9:26 am » wrote: ↑

Yesterday, 9:26 am

You got it.  I will not use graphics that are slightly technically inaccurate.

Your turn.  Tell him.

Do you understand the word “might”
 

 

Yup, you are a ******.  The fact of the matter is the current AR 15 bans that BV supports are not based on function but based on external features, mostly cosmetic.  

In VA, Jul 1st the AR ban became law and it is based on what I said above.  Not function.  Now, although they are rare, you can own Class III weapons in VA if you have the money and can pass the background check.

Makes no sense.

Blackvegetable » Yesterday, 6:57 am » wrote: ↑

Yesterday, 6:57 am

Judge clarifies: Yes, Trump was found to have raped E. Jean Carroll

JohnnyYou » Yesterday, 5:44 am » wrote: ↑

Yesterday, 5:44 am

I thought you didn;t know what graping was..

Get your thumb out of your *** ROG.

Repent.. Get UnTrump Bent.

johnny, what does me agreeing with quatchy’s view on 2nd amendment rights have to do with graping?