I thought you mentioned it first..ROG62 » Yesterday, 10:23 am » wrote: ↑ johnny, what does me agreeing with quatchy’s view on 2nd amendment rights have to do with graping?
Where are my words?
Oh, my bad. You do not support bans.
Huey » Yesterday, 12:32 pm » wrote: ↑
Tell us why you want this banned:
Let's put aside the fact you used to go on and on about the people who were attracted to it based on appearance, and the fact that I once posted a picture of a S & W 15-22 and you said it should be banned, let say I am wrong you are basing your opinion on visuals.
I didn't ask for a different narrative...Huey » Yesterday, 1:31 pm » wrote: ↑
Let's put aside the fact you used to go on and on about the people who were attracted to it based on appearance, and the fact that I once posted a picture of a S & W 15-22 and you said it should be banned, let say I am wrong you are basing your opinion on visuals.
Tell us why that weapon should be banned? Was it designed for combat?
Dude, how often did your mom drop you on your head? I am conceding that although you spoke often about who the rifle attracts you never did say what I claimed, although you support the current bans that are based on appearance. Is that false.Blackvegetable » Yesterday, 2:11 pm » wrote: ↑I didn't ask for a different narrative...Huey » Yesterday, 1:31 pm » wrote: ↑
Let's put aside the fact you used to go on and on about the people who were attracted to it based on appearance, and the fact that I once posted a picture of a S & W 15-22 and you said it should be banned, let say I am wrong you are basing your opinion on visuals.
Tell us why that weapon should be banned? Was it designed for combat?
I asked for my words..
As you're inclined to.
#notsincereHuey » Yesterday, 9:26 am » wrote: ↑ You got it. I will not use graphics that are slightly technically inaccurate.
Your turn. Tell him.
A sugar mini 14?Huey » Yesterday, 8:10 am » wrote: ↑ It that is the best you can come up with, anal one, lets compare apples to apples. Below are sugar min 14s. one will be legal and one won't
Do you see @Blackvegetable ?
*Roshambo » Yesterday, 2:19 pm » wrote: ↑#notsincereHuey » Yesterday, 9:26 am » wrote: ↑ You got it. I will not use graphics that are slightly technically inaccurate.
Your turn. Tell him.
A raffle? I’m inHuey » Yesterday, 2:23 pm » wrote: ↑ Run away ya scared ******. You have no integrity. You know BV supports taking your right to won firearms away
You lefties are the dumbest people on earth.
Bitch, go back to sucking BV's dick while he works to restrict your rights to own firearms. You are one waste of a Payday ****, Junior.*Roshambo » Yesterday, 2:21 pm » wrote: ↑A sugar mini 14?Huey » Yesterday, 8:10 am » wrote: ↑ It that is the best you can come up with, anal one, lets compare apples to apples. Below are sugar min 14s. one will be legal and one won't
Do you see @Blackvegetable ?
kid you will rot yourth
#asugarmini14mademesnaggletoothedHuey » Yesterday, 2:25 pm » wrote: ↑ Bitch, go back to sucking BV's dick while he works to restrict your rights to own firearms. You are one waste of a Payday ****, Junior.
Hey, asshole, you wanna side with the guy who wants to limit your firearm ownership go for it. Just wipe his splooge off his face before going out in public. It is unbedoming, asshole.*Roshambo » Yesterday, 2:26 pm » wrote: ↑#asugarmini14mademesnaggletoothedHuey » Yesterday, 2:25 pm » wrote: ↑ Bitch, go back to sucking BV's dick while he works to restrict your rights to own firearms. You are one waste of a Payday ****, Junior.
no one is going to limit my ownership.Huey » Yesterday, 2:28 pm » wrote: ↑ Hey, asshole, you wanna side with the guy who wants to limit your firearm ownership go for it. Just wipe his splooge off his face before going out in public. It is unbedoming, asshole.
*Roshambo » Yesterday, 2:32 pm » wrote: ↑no one is going to limit my ownership.Huey » Yesterday, 2:28 pm » wrote: ↑ Hey, asshole, you wanna side with the guy who wants to limit your firearm ownership go for it. Just wipe his splooge off his face before going out in public. It is unbedoming, asshole.
A guy like you should stick to doily’s
It’s not my job to tell him.Huey » Yesterday, 2:37 pm » wrote: ↑ You are defending a guy ( @Blackvegetablewho wants to limit the type of rifles you can own based on his ignorance. You do not have the integrity to tell him he has no clue what he is talking about. There are other lefties on this forum who have the integrity to do so. You are not one of them.
Asshole,I felt the same way as you concerning no one is going to limit my ownership. It took ONE **** election.
You are not a very smart person, asshole.
Do you recall why the Insurance Companies paid 70 million to the Sandy Hook plaintiffs?Huey » Yesterday, 2:14 pm » wrote: ↑ Dude, how often did your mom drop you on your head? I am conceding that although you spoke often about
*Roshambo » Yesterday, 2:39 pm » wrote: ↑It’s not my job to tell him.Huey » Yesterday, 2:37 pm » wrote: ↑ You are defending a guy ( @Blackvegetablewho wants to limit the type of rifles you can own based on his ignorance. You do not have the integrity to tell him he has no clue what he is talking about. There are other lefties on this forum who have the integrity to do so. You are not one of them.
Asshole,I felt the same way as you concerning no one is going to limit my ownership. It took ONE **** election.
You are not a very smart person, asshole.
Tiny, stick to doily’sHuey » Yesterday, 2:54 pm » wrote: ↑ You are like self hating jews that continue to vote for politicians who vote against Israel. I can't help you. If you really are the gun owner you claim to be I hope your ignorant *** live in a red state that respects the 2A or the politician @Blackvegetable supports will limit your ownership rights.