Blackvegetable » Yesterday, 2:45 pm » wrote: ↑Do you recall why the Insurance Companies paid 70 million to the Sandy Hook plaintiffs?Huey » Yesterday, 2:14 pm » wrote: ↑ Dude, how often did your mom drop you on your head? I am conceding that although you spoke often about
I spoke about that too.
*Roshambo » Yesterday, 2:56 pm » wrote: ↑Tiny, stick to doily’sHuey » Yesterday, 2:54 pm » wrote: ↑ You are like self hating jews that continue to vote for politicians who vote against Israel. I can't help you. If you really are the gun owner you claim to be I hope your ignorant *** live in a red state that respects the 2A or the politician @Blackvegetable supports will limit your ownership rights.
I posted a photo of oneHuey » Yesterday, 3:05 pm » wrote: ↑ Run along, Bitch. I don't think you own a single firearm. You may go now.
Blackvegetable » 19 Jul 2026, 9:11 am » wrote: ↑ You know where I get it....you are always being beaten with it..
Blackvegetable » Yesterday, 2:45 pm » wrote: ↑ Do you recall why the Insurance Companies paid 70 million to the Sandy Hook plaintiffs?
I spoke about that too.
*Roshambo » Yesterday, 3:08 pm » wrote: ↑I posted a photo of oneHuey » Yesterday, 3:05 pm » wrote: ↑ Run along, Bitch. I don't think you own a single firearm. You may go now.
I have one gun that will go 3600 rounds per minute
#doilyboy
Beekeeper » Yesterday, 3:17 pm » wrote: ↑
Ahhhh, ANOTHER **** QUESTION. But this one DOES have an answer the **** won't like!!
Insurance companies paid $73 million to the Sandy Hook plaintiffs in 2022 to settle a lawsuit against the gunmaker Remington. The insurers paid this money because the gun manufacturer was bankrupt, and the carriers agreed to hand over the absolute maximum limits of the company's available liability insurance policies to avoid a potentially larger courtroom loss.
It was a SETTLEMENT in which REMINGTON did NOT admit guilt!! Oh and through a BANKRUPTCY COURT, and not something else, ****!!
Damn, boy, that has to REALLY pour salt into that MUTILATED *** I JUST KICKED AND BLOODIED AGAIN!!
duh...to avoid a potentially larger courtroom loss.
Shhhh..Huey » Yesterday, 2:56 pm » wrote: ↑ Not because of the weapon I posted, ya ****. That is an Airsoft rifle you stupid ****. Your knee jerk reaction was based on appearance, not function.
You are not smart enough to be in this conversation ya stupid ****.
Blackvegetable » Yesterday, 3:49 pm » wrote: ↑ duh...
But what was it that made that loss so likely?
Blackvegetable » Yesterday, 3:49 pm » wrote: ↑ duh...
But what was it that made that loss so likely?
Sue the BBC for 10$ Billion..
Post the premise of the lawsuit.
I will answer your question with your pledge that you will answer mine...Beekeeper » Yesterday, 5:05 pm » wrote: ↑ Post the premise of the lawsuit.
BET you RUN as you ALWAYS DO!!
Blackvegetable » Yesterday, 5:07 pm » wrote: ↑ I will answer your question with your pledge that you will answer mine...
No.
Blackvegetable » Yesterday, 5:15 pm » wrote: ↑ No.
I don't play games with LIARS and COWARDS.
You are both.
TrumpEpstienBeekeeper » Yesterday, 7:56 pm » wrote: ↑ Nope, cupcake.
ASK ANYONE HERE who the **** COWARDLY ****** IS!!! That's going to ALWAYS come back to YOU, ASSHOLE!!
You can't get me to play your little game, and you can go to the bank I'M NOT PLAYING EVER!!
Now, POST what was the PREMISE OF THE LAWSUIT!!