Liberal Forum

Zeets2 » 18 Jul 2026, 12:42 pm » wrote: ↑

18 Jul 2026, 12:42 pm

Huey » 18 Jul 2026, 9:35 am » wrote: ↑

18 Jul 2026, 9:35 am

Appeals court says NJ’s AR-15, high-capacity magazine bans violate Second Amendment

A federal appeals court invalidated New Jersey’s ban on “assault” firearms and high-capacity magazines in a 10-5 vote on Friday, ruling that it violates the Second Amendment.

 The decision by the 3rd U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals hands gun rights advocates one of their biggest legal victories yet on the issue as the Supreme Court gears up to provide a nationwide resolution next term in a separate case

https://thehill.com/regulation/court-ba ... azine-ban/

I'm delighted to learn the courts have kicked my stupid state's dumb *** with their far left anti-constitutional idiocy!    
 

 

Yeah, I once lived in NJ for a few years.  

Huey » 18 Jul 2026, 1:09 pm » wrote: ↑

18 Jul 2026, 1:09 pm

Yeah, I once lived in NJ for a few years.

Well, we're rapidly becoming a completely liberal cesspool of liberal stupidity, and I don't see that changing in my lifetime.
But I've got my gun, I'm in a safe, gated retirement community that's far enough away from the worst liberal strongholds of Newark, Paterson, and Trenton, and have cut my property taxes to less than half of what they were in northern Jersey, so I really shouldn't complain.

But I will.

Zeets2 » 18 Jul 2026, 1:41 pm » wrote: ↑

18 Jul 2026, 1:41 pm

Huey » 18 Jul 2026, 1:09 pm » wrote: ↑

18 Jul 2026, 1:09 pm

Yeah, I once lived in NJ for a few years.

Well, we're rapidly becoming a completely liberal cesspool of liberal stupidity, and I don't see that changing in my lifetime.
But I've got my gun, I'm in a safe, gated retirement community that's far enough away from the worst liberal strongholds of Newark, Paterson, and Trenton, and have cut my property taxes to less than half of what they were in northern Jersey, so I really shouldn't complain.

But I will.

 

I lived in the Hamlet/Keansburg area for a few years in the 70s.  The poor/working man's Jersey Shore at the time

Blackvegetable » 18 Jul 2026, 11:31 am » wrote: ↑

18 Jul 2026, 11:31 am

Not this ******* **** again.

Typical level 0 rebuttal. Like always.

Vegas » 18 Jul 2026, 1:57 pm » wrote: ↑

18 Jul 2026, 1:57 pm

Typical level 0 rebuttal. Like always.

You can't defend that assertion.


Go soil yourself.
 

Huey » 18 Jul 2026, 1:48 pm » wrote: ↑

18 Jul 2026, 1:48 pm

I lived in the Hamlet/Keansburg area for a few years in the 70s.  The poor/working man's Jersey Shore at the time

I know the area well!  Spent a lot of time fishing off the Keansburg pier.
I'm a bit further south now, just west of Spring Lake.
 

Blackvegetable » 18 Jul 2026, 11:30 am » wrote: ↑

18 Jul 2026, 11:30 am

Why is it good news that assault weapons are promiscuously marketed to civilians?

Show us ONE INSTANCE where an AR-15 has been used in a theater of war, cupcake!!

When you do, then you MIGHT have some claim to your "assault weapon" as being marketed to civilians!!

GO!!

Blackvegetable » 18 Jul 2026, 11:31 am » wrote: ↑

18 Jul 2026, 11:31 am

Not this ******* **** again.

Are you back to not understanding the SIMPLE MEANING of the 2nd Amendment??

Post what it says!!

Blackvegetable » 18 Jul 2026, 11:39 am » wrote: ↑

18 Jul 2026, 11:39 am

Why do you presume?

You suck at everything involving words and/or numbers.

YOU suck at everything. 

Words AND numbers both are not your strong suit.

And toss in your knowledge of GUNS, and what we have is far less than your typical imbecile.

Blackvegetable » 18 Jul 2026, 2:14 pm » wrote: ↑

18 Jul 2026, 2:14 pm

You can't defend that assertion.

Go soil yourself.

The second amendment is an assertion?     

Vegas » 18 Jul 2026, 4:02 pm » wrote: ↑

18 Jul 2026, 4:02 pm

The second amendment is an assertion?   

They think that.

AND they think that you need to ASK PERMISSION to exercise your CONSTITUTIONAL RIGHTS regardless of what they are!!

The FACT IS, our rights come from GOD and not these **** idiots. The CONSITUTION only keeps GOVERNMENT from trampling on them. THAT's the part they don't seem to fully comprehend!! They actually think that they can LIMIT RIGHTS BY GOVERNMENT/LAWS in the "interest of public safety". Well, there's NO MENTION of that in ANY of the Bill of Rights amendments, so the FOUNDERS and WRITERS of those Bill of Rights felt that "public safety" wasn't going to TRUMP THE RIGHTS I AUTOMATICALLY WE HAVE and that GOVERNMENT can't use that as some lame *** reason to take away those rights.

But then again, these **** IDIOTS would eat plates FULL of **** if they thought it would "GET TRUMP"!!

Vegas » 18 Jul 2026, 4:02 pm » wrote: ↑

18 Jul 2026, 4:02 pm

The second amendment is an assertion?   

You didn't assert the 2nd Amendment 



This is about the "individual right".


**** cuspidor.
 

Beekeeper » 18 Jul 2026, 3:18 pm » wrote: ↑

18 Jul 2026, 3:18 pm

YOU suck at everything. 


 

You run from everything 

Blackvegetable » 18 Jul 2026, 5:44 pm » wrote: ↑

18 Jul 2026, 5:44 pm

You didn't assert the 2nd Amendment 

This is about the "individual right".

**** cuspidor.

Did you even read the OP? You moron. 

What the hell was the basis for overturning the ban in the first place. 

Seriously. You are too stupid to be alive.

Vegas » 18 Jul 2026, 5:54 pm » wrote: ↑

18 Jul 2026, 5:54 pm

Did you even read the OP? You moron. 

What the hell was the basis for overturning the ban in the first place. 

Seriously. You are too stupid to be alive.

Did you read your own ****, moron?

Blackvegetable » 18 Jul 2026, 11:30 am » wrote: ↑

18 Jul 2026, 11:30 am

Why is it good news that assault weapons are promiscuously marketed to civilians?

You don't even know what an "assault weapon" is. AR-15's by definition, are not assault weapons. They don't have select-fire. But, of course... you don't even know what that means. You're a **** idiot. 

Stick to trying to legislate topics that Dems know about. Gay sex and **** like that. Not guns. 

SouthernFried » 18 Jul 2026, 6:23 pm » wrote: ↑

18 Jul 2026, 6:23 pm

You don't even know what an "assault weapon" is. AR-15's by definition, are not assault weapons. They don't have select-fire. But, of course... you don't even know what that means. You're a **** idiot. 

Stick to trying to legislate topics that Dems know about. Gay sex and **** like that. Not guns.

Please don't. 



 

Blackvegetable » 18 Jul 2026, 6:28 pm » wrote: ↑

18 Jul 2026, 6:28 pm

Please don't.

Tell us why an AR-15 (an assault weapon according to you) should be banned, but a wood Mini-14 shouldn't? Make it make sense. 
 

SouthernFried » 18 Jul 2026, 6:34 pm » wrote: ↑

18 Jul 2026, 6:34 pm

Tell us why an AR-15 (an assault weapon according to you) should be banned, but a wood Mini-14 shouldn't? Make it make sense.

What's in this for me?

Blackvegetable » 18 Jul 2026, 7:10 pm » wrote: ↑

18 Jul 2026, 7:10 pm

What's in this for me?

You just gonna play dodge, dip, duck, dive and dodge like you always do?