Liberal Forum

Vegas » 19 Jul 2026, 10:42 am » wrote: ↑

19 Jul 2026, 10:42 am

So I am now required to dumb things down for you? No. **** that. You couldn't figure out basic vocab. Not my problem. 



 

defend your assertion the Survivorship bias applies to the APSA survey. 

Blackvegetable » 19 Jul 2026, 10:45 am » wrote: ↑

19 Jul 2026, 10:45 am

defend your assertion the Survivorship bias applies to the APSA survey.

Where did I say it did? I said YOU were committing the bias you dumb mother ****.



Dig it up? LOL You need to pay up first. Your **** memory is not my problem.

Huey » 19 Jul 2026, 10:36 am » wrote: ↑

19 Jul 2026, 10:36 am

It is either on the civilian list or the military list.  

That's irrelevant....

This article describes the many variations of the Colt AR-15 and M16 rifle family of weapons produced by Colt's Manufacturing Company. Weapons patterned on the original ArmaLite AR-15 design


how many families?


how many designs?



Here's your L

Blackvegetable » 19 Jul 2026, 10:48 am » wrote: ↑

19 Jul 2026, 10:48 am

Huey » 19 Jul 2026, 10:36 am » wrote: ↑

19 Jul 2026, 10:36 am

It is either on the civilian list or the military list.  

That's irrelevant....

This article describes the many variations of the Colt AR-15 and M16 rifle family of weapons produced by Colt's Manufacturing Company. Weapons patterned on the original ArmaLite AR-15 design


how many families?


how many designs?



Here's your L

 

Stop reframing, Runny.  Answer the questions.

Have already answered those questions, Puss.  Just because you don't the FACT that is one family with multiple designs doesn't mean I am wrong.

Is the Colt Sporter on the military or civilian list?  What years was the Sporter standard combat issue in the US?

And how come you never link that?  While I do?  Another Puss move?

Blackvegetable » 19 Jul 2026, 10:45 am » wrote: ↑

19 Jul 2026, 10:45 am

defend your assertion the Survivorship bias applies to the APSA survey.

More evidence of how illiterate you are. When you refuse to read posts, it backfires every time. 
           

           VVV
 "   >>>you<<< are making a "survivorship bias" fallacy. And **** you if you think I am going to define that for you. "
            ^^^


You see it? Right there.Surrounded by the pointer for your convenience. The word "YOU." Not the APSA. You are stupid.
 

Huey » 19 Jul 2026, 10:51 am » wrote: ↑

19 Jul 2026, 10:51 am

Stop reframing, Runny.  Answer the questions.


 

A reference to a dispositive citation is not refraining, Tiny..

Vegas » 19 Jul 2026, 10:52 am » wrote: ↑

19 Jul 2026, 10:52 am

More evidence of how illiterate you are. When you refuse to read posts, it backfires every time. 

           VVV
 "   >>>you<<< are making a "survivorship bias" fallacy. And **** you if you think I am going to define that for you. "
            ^^^

You see it? Right there.Surrounded by the pointer for your convenience. The word "YOU." Not the APSA. You are stupid.

I had nothing to do with the survey..

**** idiot.
 

Blackvegetable » 19 Jul 2026, 11:00 am » wrote: ↑

19 Jul 2026, 11:00 am

I had nothing to do with the survey..

**** idiot.

So? Your defense if it did. 
 

Blackvegetable » 19 Jul 2026, 10:57 am » wrote: ↑

19 Jul 2026, 10:57 am

Huey » 19 Jul 2026, 10:51 am » wrote: ↑

19 Jul 2026, 10:51 am

Stop reframing, Runny.  Answer the questions.



 

A reference to a dispositive citation is not refraining, Tiny..

 

 

Blackvegetable » 19 Jul 2026, 10:59 am » wrote: ↑

19 Jul 2026, 10:59 am

Huey » 19 Jul 2026, 10:53 am » wrote: ↑

19 Jul 2026, 10:53 am

Now you understand how most of us feel after reading your posts, particularly about Soccer and the AR 15 civilian rifle.

But I'm not in conflict with my citations....

 

I'm not.  You are using my sources.

If you are not in conflict with your citations you should be able to say the following:

"Huey, the Colt Sporter does not appear on the military list because it is on the civilian list and it was never standard issue for a personal combat weapon.

Vegas » 19 Jul 2026, 11:02 am » wrote: ↑

19 Jul 2026, 11:02 am

So? Your defense if it did.

Then explain how my defense involved "Survivorship bias"


Or stop digging, stupid **** 

Blackvegetable » 19 Jul 2026, 11:06 am » wrote: ↑

19 Jul 2026, 11:06 am

Then explain how my defense involved "Survivorship bias"


 

        I literally said this about 5 minutes ago and you already forgot. 

"Dig it up? LOL You need to pay up first. Your **** memory is not my problem."

You are as a predictable as the sun rising in the East. 

Vegas » 19 Jul 2026, 11:08 am » wrote: ↑

19 Jul 2026, 11:08 am

        I literally 

Just do it.

Huey » 19 Jul 2026, 11:05 am » wrote: ↑

19 Jul 2026, 11:05 am

I'm not.  You are using my sources.

If you are not in conflict with your citations you should be able to say the following:

"Huey, the Colt Sporter does not appear on the military list because it is on the civilian list and it was never standard issue for a personal combat weapon.

If I am in conflict with my sources, you need to show me.

Blackvegetable » 19 Jul 2026, 11:23 am » wrote: ↑

19 Jul 2026, 11:23 am

Huey » 19 Jul 2026, 11:05 am » wrote: ↑

19 Jul 2026, 11:05 am

I'm not.  You are using my sources.

If you are not in conflict with your citations you should be able to say the following:

"Huey, the Colt Sporter does not appear on the military list because it is on the civilian list and it was never standard issue for a personal combat weapon.

If I am in conflict with my sources, you need to show me.

 

 

Huey » 19 Jul 2026, 11:05 am » wrote: ↑

19 Jul 2026, 11:05 am

Blackvegetable » 19 Jul 2026, 10:57 am » wrote: ↑

19 Jul 2026, 10:57 am

Huey » 19 Jul 2026, 10:51 am » wrote: ↑

19 Jul 2026, 10:51 am

Stop reframing, Runny.  Answer the questions.




 

A reference to a dispositive citation is not refraining, Tiny..


 

Blackvegetable » 19 Jul 2026, 10:59 am » wrote: ↑

19 Jul 2026, 10:59 am

Huey » 19 Jul 2026, 10:53 am » wrote: ↑

19 Jul 2026, 10:53 am

Now you understand how most of us feel after reading your posts, particularly about Soccer and the AR 15 civilian rifle.

But I'm not in conflict with my citations....


 

I'm not.  You are using my sources.

If you are not in conflict with your citations you should be able to say the following:

"Huey, the Colt Sporter does not appear on the military list because it is on the civilian list and it was never standard issue for a personal combat weapon.

 

This is you being shown you are in conflict with the sources you are using.  The colt shorter is not on the military list.  It was never combat issue.  That is why it is on the civilian list because it was not designed for combat.

Even after I answered your family and design question for the umpteenth time you still run like a puss from answering mine.  This should put to rest who runs from questions and who doesn't.

STFU, take you L, and move on.

Blackvegetable » 19 Jul 2026, 11:23 am » wrote: ↑

19 Jul 2026, 11:23 am

Huey » 19 Jul 2026, 11:05 am » wrote: ↑

19 Jul 2026, 11:05 am

I'm not.  You are using my sources.

If you are not in conflict with your citations you should be able to say the following:

"Huey, the Colt Sporter does not appear on the military list because it is on the civilian list and it was never standard issue for a personal combat weapon.

If I am in conflict with my sources, you need to show me.

 

I just did.  I have answered your questions.  Tell me what list the weapon is in and when it was standard combat issue.

Coward.

ROG62 » 19 Jul 2026, 7:00 am » wrote: ↑

19 Jul 2026, 7:00 am

Well said…

  Even a blind monkey finds a banana every now and then.
 

Huey » 19 Jul 2026, 11:27 am » wrote: ↑

19 Jul 2026, 11:27 am

Even after I answered your family and design question for the umpteenth time.
 

  If I were you I would just ignore him.
He only asks the same question over and over because he knows you'll argue with him about it.
  If you ignore him it takes away his percieved win. He's then reduced to shakimg his fist at clouds.
 

Squatchman » 19 Jul 2026, 12:03 pm » wrote: ↑

19 Jul 2026, 12:03 pm

Huey » 19 Jul 2026, 11:27 am » wrote: ↑

19 Jul 2026, 11:27 am

Even after I answered your family and design question for the umpteenth time.

 

  If I were you I would just ignore him.
He only asks the same question over and over because he knows you'll argue with him about it.
  If you ignore him it takes away his percieved win. He's then reduced to shakimg his fist at clouds.
 

 

Ok.  We'll see.  I do have an AR 12 as a novelty,  In this dumb *** state I can't transfer it except to family.

Huey » 19 Jul 2026, 11:27 am » wrote: ↑

19 Jul 2026, 11:27 am

This is you being shown you are in conflict with the sources you are using.  The colt shorter is not on the military list.  It was never combat issue.  That is why it is on the civilian list because it was not designed for combat.

Even after I answered your family and design question for the umpteenth time you still run like a puss from answering mine.  This should put to rest who runs from questions and who doesn't.

STFU, take you L, and move on.

Even after I answered your family and design question for the umpteenth time

:rofl:  

The minute you answer, the "debate is over...

The Colt AR-15 is a product line of magazine-fed, gas-operated, autoloading rifles manufactured by Colt's Manufacturing Company ("Colt") in many configurations.[1] The rifle is a derivative of its predecessor, the lightweight ArmaLite AR-15, an automatic rifle designed by Eugene Stoner and other engineers at ArmaLite in 1956.


duh.

Squatchman » 19 Jul 2026, 12:03 pm » wrote: ↑

19 Jul 2026, 12:03 pm

  If I were you I would just ignore him.
He only asks the same question over and over because he knows you'll argue with him about it.
  If you ignore him it takes away his percieved win. He's then reduced to shakimg his fist at clouds.

Here's an idea.


Come up with a credible source detailing a separate development of the "semi auto" AR-15.

I have traced this back to the original 2 dozen "Sporters".....they were the same weapon sold to the military - except they were modified to comply with ATF regs. These were distributed to members of the board at Colt to celebrate the 2nd order from the military.

The first order came from the Air Force, ca. 1962....for semi auto AR-15s.