So give up asshole..
Blackvegetable » Yesterday, 2:40 pm » wrote: ↑ https://youtube.com/shorts/27qPeYt5YL8? ... gN4kOcH9UO
In 10 years MAGA is gonna be a synonym for "slizz"...
I'M NOT GONNA PLAY YOUR GAMES.....(....sob...)..!
Do you see the bold part? That was my claim. The second half of it? That is not a claim.you are making a "survivorship bias" fallacy. And **** you if you think I am going to define that for you. "
digest.php?u=1050Vegas » 6 minutes ago » wrote: ↑ Which of the following is the best example of shifting the burden of proof?
A. Making a claim and then providing evidence to support it.
B. Asking someone to clarify what they mean before responding.
C. Copying a claim from the internet, refusing to defend it, and then demanding that everyone else prove it wrong.
D. Changing your opinion after better evidence is presented.
I am going to paste the following along with the question. It just saves time.
Do you see the bold part? That was my claim. The second half of it? That is not a claim.
I did my job and proved my claim. I gave you links and supported my thesis...which you ran from. That second part? I am under no obligation to go over vocab with you. That is a term that anyone who claims to have knowledge of statistics should know. Your ignorance of basic vocab is not my duty to rectify. That is on you.
Do you see the bold part? That was my claim. The second half of it? That is not a claim.you are making a "survivorship bias" fallacy. And **** you if you think I am going to define that for you. "
E.Vegas » 4 minutes ago » wrote: ↑ Which of the following is the best example of shifting the burden of proof?
A. Making a claim and then providing evidence to support it.
B. Asking someone to clarify what they mean before responding.
C. Copying a claim from the internet, refusing to defend it, and then demanding that everyone else prove it wrong.
D. Changing your opinion after better evidence is presented.
I am going to paste the following along with the question. It just saves time.
Do you see the bold part? That was my claim. The second half of it? That is not a claim.
I did my job and proved my claim. I gave you links and supported my thesis...which you ran from. That second part? I am under no obligation to go over vocab with you. That is a term that anyone who claims to have knowledge of statistics should know. Your ignorance of basic vocab is not my duty to rectify. That is on you.
E has been debunked. Already included in these post. And didn't click it, I will not....you know the rest.
Do you see the bold part? That was my claim. The second half of it? That is not a claim.you are making a "survivorship bias" fallacy. And **** you if you think I am going to define that for you. "
Blatant lie.
Do you see the bold part? That was my claim. The second half of it? That is not a claim.you are making a "survivorship bias" fallacy. And **** you if you think I am going to define that for you. "
Do you see the bold part? That was my claim. The second half of it? That is not a claim.you are making a "survivorship bias" fallacy. And **** you if you think I am going to define that for you. "
That crap?Vegas » 11 minutes ago » wrote: ↑![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
Why do you do this to yourself? It's literally below the multiple choice question. Every single time. Literally, every time...including what you just quoted.
.
Do you see the bold part? That was my claim. The second half of it? That is not a claim.
I did my job and proved my claim. I gave you links and supported my thesis...which you ran from. That second part? I am under no obligation to go over vocab with you. That is a term that anyone who claims to have knowledge of statistics should know. Your ignorance of basic vocab is not my duty to rectify. That is on you.
Well of course you are going to say that. Duh. Any evidence that flattens you is going to be dismissed by your *******.
Do you see the bold part? That was my claim. The second half of it? That is not a claim.you are making a "survivorship bias" fallacy. And **** you if you think I am going to define that for you. "
Your usual cop-out ^^^ Moron .
Do you see the bold part? That was my claim. The second half of it? That is not a claim.you are making a "survivorship bias" fallacy. And **** you if you think I am going to define that for you. "
And how is it that a dope like you thinks we SHOULD be wasting money on pork given to liberal programs WHEN YOU LOST THE ELECTION IN A LANDSLIDE?Blackvegetable » Yesterday, 4:59 pm » wrote: ↑ Historically, the cost of the United States Agency for International Development (USAID) averaged roughly $105 to $120 per U.S. citizen per year (or about $36 to $45 annually based on specific taxpayer calculations) when the agency operated on an annual budget of around $40 billion to $63 billion.
To QUOTE your KNEEGROW GOD, ovomit the moron,...Blackvegetable » Yesterday, 4:59 pm » wrote: ↑ Historically, the cost of the United States Agency for International Development (USAID) averaged roughly $105 to $120 per U.S. citizen per year (or about $36 to $45 annually based on specific taxpayer calculations) when the agency operated on an annual budget of around $40 billion to $63 billion.
Post the popular vote margin...
Always crap.Vegas » Today, 12:43 pm » wrote: ↑ Copies me. Thereby, once again, proving that he has no thoughts of his own.
Anyway, I am going