Liberal Forum

You REALLY can't make this **** up as it COMPLETELY writes itself for the entire WORLD to see.

**** are THE dumbest pieces of morons **** that ever sucked air. They don't deserve to breath. Hell, they can't even decide on WHO TO RUN in a PRIMARY, much less know how to win elections.

OH WAIT!! They DO know how to REGISTER AND LET VOTE, ILLEGALS AND NON-CITIZENS!! They cheat really good!!

Yesterday, Townhall reported that the Wisconsin Democrats (WisDems) wrote to the Wisconsin Election Commission (WEC) asking them to rescind guidance and allow some of the 80,000-plus Wisconsinites who have already cast absentee ballots in the state to vote again if their preferred candidate dropped out or, in the case of David Crowley, reentered the race after dropping out.

 The WEC said no.

 Now the WisDems have filed a lawsuit to force the WEC to give these voters a mulligan.

https://x.com/PostCrescent/status/20803 ... t-n2680033
Here's more:

A trio of Dane County voters backed by the state Democratic Party is suing the Wisconsin Elections Commission over guidance the panel issued earlier this month that bars absentee voters who have returned their ballots from requesting a new one if their preferred candidate drops out.The lawsuit, filed in Dane County Circuit Court on July 23, asks the judge overseeing the case to block the commission from distributing the guidance and to instead tell local election clerks voters may request a new ballot in this scenario.The court action could upend election rules less than three weeks from the Aug. 11 primary election when voters are set to decide which Democratic candidate for governor they want to face Republican candidate Tom Tiffany in the general election.

In other words, three people now get to undo voting laws for the entire state because they couldn't be bothered to vote on Election Day, August 11, and took a risk casting an absentee ballot.

 
 

Beekeeper » Today, 5:52 pm » wrote: ↑

Today, 5:52 pm

You REALLY can't make this **** up as it COMPLETELY writes itself for the entire WORLD to see.

**** are THE dumbest pieces of morons **** that ever sucked air. They don't deserve to breath. Hell, they can't even decide on WHO TO RUN in a PRIMARY, much less know how to win elections.

OH WAIT!! They DO know how to REGISTER AND LET VOTE, ILLEGALS AND NON-CITIZENS!! They cheat really good!!

Yesterday, Townhall reported that the Wisconsin Democrats (WisDems) wrote to the Wisconsin Election Commission (WEC) asking them to rescind guidance and allow some of the 80,000-plus Wisconsinites who have already cast absentee ballots in the state to vote again if their preferred candidate dropped out or, in the case of David Crowley, reentered the race after dropping out.

 The WEC said no.

 Now the WisDems have filed a lawsuit to force the WEC to give these voters a mulligan.

https://x.com/PostCrescent/status/20803 ... t-n2680033
Here's more:

In other words, three people now get to undo voting laws for the entire state because they couldn't be bothered to vote on Election Day, August 11, and took a risk casting an absentee ballot.

**** are THE dumbest pieces of morons **** that ever sucked air. They don't deserve to breath.

"167!"


:rofl:  

Blackvegetable » Yesterday, 8:23 pm » wrote: ↑

Yesterday, 8:23 pm

"167!"

I was like one of 100 total Republican mail in voters in my county. They were mostly for the Republican I chose for Governor.. the one who might have a shot at beating Wes Moore.  The Trump endorsed candidate won.  Dan Cox..

Desperado...
 

Blackvegetable » Yesterday, 8:23 pm » wrote: ↑

Yesterday, 8:23 pm

"167!"

"WE have to Save Democracy".

"But, but we need a DO OVER since we are too **** STUPID to get good candidates and the COMMIES are taking over!!"

Beekeeper » Today, 5:09 am » wrote: ↑

Today, 5:09 am

"WE have to Save Democracy".

"But, but we need a DO OVER since we are too **** STUPID to get good candidates and the COMMIES are taking over!!"

Yeah, as well as elections are run, having to eliminate votes by voter name / candidate / reissue new ballots and keeping voter non duplicate ballots verified, is a tall, tall order…I mean, “what could go wrong?”

Beekeeper » Today, 5:09 am » wrote: ↑

Today, 5:09 am

Blackvegetable » Yesterday, 8:23 pm » wrote: ↑

Yesterday, 8:23 pm

"167!"

"WE have to Save Democracy".

"But, but we need a DO OVER since we are too **** STUPID to get good candidates and the COMMIES are taking over!!"

It reminds me of dem Sen Robert Torricelli when he was on the ballot in NJ in 2003 but got federal corruption charges against him.  The republican challenger had a large lead in the polls.  It had been years since a pub had won the seat.  Torricelli dropped out AFTER the deadline to take changes to the ballot.  The dems went to court and said that NJ law did not take into this situation and allowed them to make the change.  This occurred just over a month before the election.
 

Huey » Today, 8:45 am » wrote: ↑

Today, 8:45 am

It reminds me of dem Sen Robert Torricelli when he was on the ballot in NJ in 2003 but got federal corruption charges against him.  The republican challenger had a large lead in the polls.  It had been years since a pub had won the seat.  Torricelli dropped out AFTER the deadline to take changes to the ballot.  The dems went to court and said that NJ law did not take into this situation and allowed them to make the change.  This occurred just over a month before the election.

What was the outcome?
 

ROG62 » 31 minutes ago » wrote: ↑

31 minutes ago

Huey » Today, 8:45 am » wrote: ↑

Today, 8:45 am

It reminds me of dem Sen Robert Torricelli when he was on the ballot in NJ in 2003 but got federal corruption charges against him.  The republican challenger had a large lead in the polls.  It had been years since a pub had won the seat.  Torricelli dropped out AFTER the deadline to take changes to the ballot.  The dems went to court and said that NJ law did not take into this situation and allowed them to make the change.  This occurred just over a month before the election.

What was the outcome?
 

 

After the judge ruled that they could replace Torricelli about a month after the deadline they placed Frank Lautenberg on the ballot.  He had held the seat in the past and had retired.  He was in about the same shape as Biden was mentally.

If Torricelli was in the lead I the polls it wouldn't have happened.  The only reason he was pressured to drop out was because the republican was so far ahead.  Also keep in mind old school absentee ballots had already been completed.