Liberal Forum

Huey » 4 minutes ago » wrote: ↑

4 minutes ago

To quote quote you 

Fredo, your stutter...

Blackvegetable » 8 minutes ago » wrote: ↑

8 minutes ago

Fredo, your stutter...

 

To quote quote you we are doing this my way or now way at all.  Your rules.
 

Huey » 10 minutes ago » wrote: ↑

10 minutes ago

To quote quote you we are doing this my way or now way at all.  Your rules.

My rule is that we do it my way....because your ways suck.

Blackvegetable » 2 minutes ago » wrote: ↑

2 minutes ago

My rule is that we do it my way....because your ways suck.

 

Yawn,

Blackvegetable » 47 minutes ago » wrote: ↑

47 minutes ago

My rule is that we do it my way....because your ways suck.

You know what they say, right?  **** your rules…
 

Huey » Today, 8:43 am » wrote: ↑

Today, 8:43 am

To quote quote you we are doing this my way or now way at all.  Your rules.

Now way, no way, or know way?

Blackvegetable » Today, 5:21 am » wrote: ↑

Today, 5:21 am

So **** g'ddammned stupid 


After reviewing thousands of pages of evidence over the past few weeks, Ms. Pirro determined the Hearn indictment needed to be rescinded before it was thrown out of court, according to two people close to the situation. 

Her critics have questioned whether her motive was nearly so straightforward or altruistic. 

They suggest that Ms. Pirro’s decision to withdraw the indictment was self-protective: She might be trying to head off disciplinary action that could result if grand jury testimony or other internal materials are made public. Mr. Hearn’s lawyers said she was guilty of what she had accused Mr. Burgum of doing — rushing to take an action to appease her boss — and that she had ample access, before indicting Mr. Hearn, to evidence showing that the damage had been caused by the contractor.


 

And now for the rest of the  story......Ms. Pirro’s filing suggested that Mr. Burgum had committed the twofold sin of failing to competently oversee the renovation, then prodding Mr. Trump to accept the vandals-did-it story. Ms. Pirro said that her staff had relied almost exclusively on claims by Interior Department officials that extensive damage to the lining was caused by Mr. Hearn and other vandals who were observed tugging at or removing pieces of material from the wall.

 After reviewing thousands of pages of evidence, she concluded the department had rushed and “botched” the renovation, and that bad information from Park Police officials had led her to cite “tremendous evidence” against Mr. Hearn that did not exist.

AND


Ms. Pirro knew full well that her U-turn could infuriate Mr. Trump, but decided to cram her filing with enough evidence to decisively disprove Mr. Burgum’s claims.


https://www.nytimes.com/2026/08/04/us/p ... =url-share

Sounds like the right thing was done here, a wrong was righted, and still you bitch.  
 
 

Huey » 50 minutes ago » wrote: ↑

50 minutes ago

And now for the rest of the  story......Ms. Pirro’s filing suggested that Mr. Burgum had committed the twofold sin of failing to competently oversee the renovation, then prodding Mr. Trump to accept the vandals-did-it story. Ms. Pirro said that her staff had relied almost exclusively on claims by Interior Department officials that extensive damage to the lining was caused by Mr. Hearn and other vandals who were observed tugging at or removing pieces of material from the wall.

 After reviewing thousands of pages of evidence, she concluded the department had rushed and “botched” the renovation, and that bad information from Park Police officials had led her to cite “tremendous evidence” against Mr. Hearn that did not exist.

AND

Ms. Pirro knew full well that her U-turn could infuriate Mr. Trump, but decided to cram her filing with enough evidence to decisively disprove Mr. Burgum’s claims.

https://www.nytimes.com/2026/08/04/us/p ... =url-share

Sounds like the right thing was done here, a wrong was righted, and still you bitch.

Sounds like?

To whom?

Pirro was going to get skinned by a judge. 

No one "did the right thing".....they did the wrong thing so badly they had to abort.
 

Blackvegetable » Today, 3:25 pm » wrote: ↑

Today, 3:25 pm

Sounds like?

To whom?

Pirro was going to get skinned by a judge. 

No one "did the right thing".....they did the wrong thing so badly they had to abort.

What Abbdul Sayed..

Blackvegetable » Yesterday, 3:25 pm » wrote: ↑

Yesterday, 3:25 pm

Sounds like?

To whom?

Pirro was going to get skinned by a judge. 

No one "did the right thing".....they did the wrong thing so badly they had to abort.

Askholio, stop your bitching and shove it up you ***.  The right thing was done here no matter how a dunce like you tries to spin it.

Huey » 4 minutes ago » wrote: ↑

4 minutes ago

Askholio, stop your bitching and 

Toady,

Melt down out of earshot.


 

Blackvegetable » 13 minutes ago » wrote: ↑

13 minutes ago

Huey » 14 minutes ago » wrote: ↑

14 minutes ago

Askholio, stop your bitching and shove it up you ***.  The right thing was done here no matter how a dunce like you tries to spin it.
 

Toady,

Melt down out of earshot.


 

 

FIFY, ROTC.

Huey » 5 minutes ago » wrote: ↑

5 minutes ago

FIFY, .

Try finding your balls...

 

Blackvegetable » 4 minutes ago » wrote: ↑

4 minutes ago

Try finding your balls...

I know where mine are.  Yours are buried in South America, Too Far.

Huey » 28 minutes ago » wrote: ↑

28 minutes ago

I know where mine are.  Yours are buried in South America, Too Far.

BV is not Peter Thiel...