Did Pirro indict the guy?Huey » 05 Aug 2026, 5:15 am » wrote: ↑ All you are doing is proving Pirro isn’t a Trump Stooge.
Keep up the good work.
Man I am grateful geriatric wisdom is marketable.. Looks like Monday is the day.. I really could use another week off retirement but, SS is reveresed.. The operating account is gonna take a big hit.. And Unemployment is running out.Huey » 05 Aug 2026, 5:15 am » wrote: ↑ You get that job yet?
Dummy, if I was a Trump Stooge, like BV is a Dem Stooge, I wouldn’t have posted what I have to this thread.
Maybe you aren’t smart enough for a job
So **** g'ddammned stupidHuey » 05 Aug 2026, 5:15 am » wrote: ↑ All you are doing is proving Pirro isn’t a Trump Stooge.
Keep up the good work.
Where's Jackie?Squatchman » 01 Aug 2026, 6:16 am » wrote: ↑ The incompetent administration had to drop charges against the guy they said vandalized the reflecting pool. "They took a razor or knife and cut a slit in the liner!" "It was liberal vandals!" No evidence to back trump's lies. Again. Not Antifa. Not liberal domestic terrorists. Not vandals period. Just more of trump's lies and wishful thinking.
Evidence actually points to the contractor being second rate. The contractor that was hand picked by Trump himself and given the contract without bidding from other more competent contractors. "He's the best!" "He does great work!" "I have complete confidence in him!"
Incompetence on glaring display once again by trump and his administration. Nobodies fault but trump's.
Lawyers for Hearn should be filing a suit against Trump for slander and the DOJ for malicious prosecution within the next the next few weeks. He's got a very strong case and will win.
I would start at 10 billion and ask for a public apology too. Maybe settle at 5 billion if they did that.
.
Where's the Ivory Coast?
US government map of Africa mislabels every country at global conferenceRebelGator » 05 Aug 2026, 5:41 am » wrote: ↑ Is that a clue about Abdul Raheem Mohammed Buckwheat's Primary Victory in Michigan?
Go wash your feet in a bed pan.....
You just can't accept the fact that she did the right thing. You're a **** loser.Blackvegetable » 05 Aug 2026, 5:21 am » wrote: ↑So **** g'ddammned stupidHuey » 05 Aug 2026, 5:15 am » wrote: ↑ All you are doing is proving Pirro isn’t a Trump Stooge.
Keep up the good work.
After reviewing thousands of pages of evidence over the past few weeks, Ms. Pirro determined the Hearn indictment needed to be rescinded before it was thrown out of court, according to two people close to the situation.
Her critics have questioned whether her motive was nearly so straightforward or altruistic.
They suggest that Ms. Pirro’s decision to withdraw the indictment was self-protective: She might be trying to head off disciplinary action that could result if grand jury testimony or other internal materials are made public. Mr. Hearn’s lawyers said she was guilty of what she had accused Mr. Burgum of doing — rushing to take an action to appease her boss — and that she had ample access, before indicting Mr. Hearn, to evidence showing that the damage had been caused by the contractor.
Did Pirro rescind it?
She INDICTED him....she withdrew because she was about to be keelhauled...Huey » 05 Aug 2026, 6:23 am » wrote: ↑ You just can't accept the fact that she did the right thing. You're a **** loser.
Yes...because she would have to face a judge.
Yup. And then rescinded it. You just gotta bitch and start ****. This is amusing.Blackvegetable » 05 Aug 2026, 6:32 am » wrote: ↑ Yes...because she would have to face a judge.
Not a pool of carefully curated reporters.
Did she indict the guy?
5x,Huey » 05 Aug 2026, 6:34 am » wrote: ↑ Yup. And then rescinded it. You just gotta bitch and start ****. This is amusing.
Oh, so it's like an Impeachment?Blackvegetable » 05 Aug 2026, 6:39 am » wrote: ↑
There were ZERO grounds for the original indictment....the Dept. of the Interior lied to the DC prosecutor.
I'm not 5x, Biden is 5x. And you swallowed that one hook, line and sinker.Blackvegetable » 05 Aug 2026, 6:39 am » wrote: ↑ 5x,
There were ZERO grounds for the original indictment....the Dept. of the Interior lied to the DC prosecutor.
Which has become common practice in this Administration.
No.....nothing at all like it.