Liberal Forum

Huey » 28 Aug 2026, 10:25 am » wrote: ↑

28 Aug 2026, 10:25 am

You realize that people laugh at you idiots now and are profiting because of your ignorance"

I laugh at you 
 

*Roshambo » 28 Aug 2026, 10:29 am » wrote: ↑

28 Aug 2026, 10:29 am

I am not ashamed of my sexuality, unlike yourself.

My mistake. You are the dumbest mother **** ever.
 

 

Ah, the ammosexual KeyBoard Komando is here!  Remember, unlike @Blackvegetable   I don't want to take away or restrict you right to gun ownership.  I support your 2A rights.

*Roshambo » 28 Aug 2026, 10:30 am » wrote: ↑

28 Aug 2026, 10:30 am

I laugh at you 
 


 

So? you are some ignorant, anonymous Keyboard Komando.  You have no bearing on my life  
 
 

*Roshambo » 28 Aug 2026, 10:14 am » wrote: ↑

28 Aug 2026, 10:14 am

JuCo, that Rustang is a 200 footer 
 

Your mind honors symbolism over evolving substances and this thread regarding 5th degree chess is really stupid.
what are the numerical positions of chess anyway with a board of 64 squares, 32 pieces, 16 pawns, 4 rooks, 4 knights, 4 bishops, and only 2 queens and 2 kings fit in the finite space of 64 squares.

6 previous generation gaps prior to your conception there were your specific 64 great great great great grandparents lived 3 centuries ago in total sum of global human population living rotation by rotation adapting equally alive in the same atmosphere.

this is genetic fate of a species in motion in plain sight of each ancestor living each rotation of the planet since Social destiny is created by context shared between every brain inhabiting time alive each rotation forward until personally dead or ancestral lineage become extinct because there aren't anymore generation gaps living within the specific DNA lineage of combined chromosomes so far.

time is a balance point of everything universally here changing forms since shaped when arrived by combined molecular content or chromosomes in ancestral lineages changing lifetimes left living next rotation of the planet.

Natural brain navigates relative position since conception staying alive now. Nurtured minds follow family traditional beliefs in the faith now isn't the eternal balancing point of all lifetimes evolving in series parallel time displaced since conception.

Minds are trained to compare everything here between heartbeats forward so far. That included counting days passed, today building plans for beyond 7 rotations of the planet not occurred yet 52 weeks annually based upon winter solstice of your specific longitude location in this atmosphere daily alive.

the planet actually only rotates 365 rotations between either winter solstice of June 21 or December 21. Yet a calendar's new year doesn't start until 12 days later. for another intellectually measured 52 week regardless the intellectual calendar counts 366 days every 4th year the total sum of human population in the atmosphere only has ancestors alive in the current 5 generation gaps living now regardless race, creed color, national origin, gendered image of 1 of 2 parents, 1 of 4 grandparents, 1 of 8 great grandparents, 1 of 16 great great grandparents, 1 of 32 great great great grandparents, 1 of 64 great great great great grandparents where anything previous to that is less than 1% previous 126 previous ancestors lived in sequence of conceptions so far that created your specific chromosomes and any siblings conceived by either or both parents you had.

Specific compounding chromosomes humanity doesn't record socially in any selected social order pretending now isn't eternity 24/7.

that is your 5th degree chess game and I call stale mate. Nobody wins ignoring their own chromosomes for some vernacular tribalism misleading ancestries last 7,000 years of history of making people believe life wasn't self evident time alive now.

Re: "playing 5D chess"Post Fri Aug 28, 2026 11:18 am
*Roshambo, who is currently on your ignore list, made this post.
Display this post.

                   
 

Huey » 28 Aug 2026, 9:32 am » wrote: ↑

28 Aug 2026, 9:32 am

I don't see a 

But I've seen this **** hundreds of times. 

Blackvegetable » 28 Aug 2026, 11:56 am » wrote: ↑

28 Aug 2026, 11:56 am

But I've seen this **** hundreds of times. 

 

YOU asked me how many guns I owned when I said I was not an ammosexual.  When I said the definition does not include a number and you for one you implied the number was not relevant.  Make up your **** mind, el Douche.

I don't see a number.  Remember, asshole, you wanted to know how many firearms I owned when I said I am not one.  Sto the **** lying.  Try again.  Also, I am not an extremm supporter of the gun cultrue or the right to bear arms.  Time for you to take a stand in a narrative fashion.

The definitions say nothing about the number of frirearms owned.  YOU tell me how many is too many.  I will only offer now that the number is LESS than it was the last time I answered.

As for number two, speaking of the 2a or discussing  the internal workings of the Sporter does not make one an ammoseuxal according to the Google definition you to look up.  So, you will have to give specific threads to make this point 
 

Blackvegetable » 28 Aug 2026, 9:13 am » wrote: ↑

28 Aug 2026, 9:13 am

How many firearms do you own?

What percentage of your threads celebrate Ammosexuality - as clearly defined?

 

Waiting on your numbers.  For both.

Huey » 28 Aug 2026, 12:01 pm » wrote: ↑

28 Aug 2026, 12:01 pm

Waiting on your numbers.  For both.

I'm waiting for your numbers....again.

Huey » 28 Aug 2026, 12:01 pm » wrote: ↑

28 Aug 2026, 12:01 pm

YOU asked 

I asked for one number and an estimate.

 

Blackvegetable » 28 Aug 2026, 1:06 pm » wrote: ↑

28 Aug 2026, 1:06 pm

I asked for one number and an estimate.

 

 

YOU asked me how many guns I owned when I said I was not an ammosexual.  When I said the definition does not include a number and you for one you implied the number was not relevant.  Make up your **** mind, el Douche.

I don't see a number.  Remember, asshole, you wanted to know how many firearms I owned when I said I am not one.  Sto the **** lying.  Try again.  Also, I am not an extremm supporter of the gun cultrue or the right to bear arms.  Time for you to take a stand in a narrative fashion.

The definitions say nothing about the number of frirearms owned.  YOU tell me how many is too many.  I will only offer now that the number is LESS than it was the last time I answered.

As for number two, speaking of the 2a or discussing  the internal workings of the Sporter does not make one an ammoseuxal according to the Google definition you to look up.  So, you will have to give specific threads to make this point 

Blackvegetable » 28 Aug 2026, 1:05 pm » wrote: ↑

28 Aug 2026, 1:05 pm

I'm waiting for your numbers....again.

 

Why?Blackvegetable
Child Groomer, Sexual PredatorPosts: 57251Contact: 
Contact BlackvegetableMoney: 1,200,071                    

•  
•  
•  
•  

Huey » Today, 10:22 am » wrote: ↑
Today, 10:22 am
The definitions say nothing about the number of frirearms owned.  

Stop lying



Ammosexual is a slang term used to describe someone who is obsessed with owning firearms or is an extreme, zealous supporter of gun culture and the right to bear arms.

Huey » 28 Aug 2026, 1:32 pm » wrote: ↑

28 Aug 2026, 1:32 pm

Why?Blackvegetable
Child Groomer, Sexual PredatorPosts: 57251Contact: 
Contact BlackvegetableMoney: 1,200,071                    

•  
•  
•  
•  

Stop lying

Ammosexual is a slang term used to describe someone who is obsessed with owning firearms or is an extreme, zealous supporter of gun culture and the right to bear arms.

In order to determine if you qualify, tell me how many guns you own and what share of your threads lick 2A splooge...

Huey » 28 Aug 2026, 1:30 pm » wrote: ↑

28 Aug 2026, 1:30 pm

YOU asked me how many guns I owned when I said I was not an ammosexual.

I didn't ask for a retelling. 

Just answer the questions. 

Blackvegetable » 28 Aug 2026, 1:40 pm » wrote: ↑

28 Aug 2026, 1:40 pm

In order to determine if you qualify, tell me how many guns you own and what share of your threads lick 2A splooge...

 

Let's see what ya got.  And you will be answering questions, ****, if not, DO NOT ask anymore.

1.  I own 5 Firearms.  2 9s, a shotgun, the Judge, a .22 Walther PPK..

2.  0.
 

Blackvegetable » 28 Aug 2026, 1:40 pm » wrote: ↑

28 Aug 2026, 1:40 pm

I didn't ask for a retelling. 

Just answer the questions. 

 

I just did.  You are either going to answer questions or not get to ask any more.  Capisce?

Huey » 28 Aug 2026, 1:49 pm » wrote: ↑

28 Aug 2026, 1:49 pm

I just did.  You are either going to answer questions or not get to ask any more.  Capisce?

1. I'm going to assume that you have 2 hands...rendering much of your armory superfluous. 

So that's a "check".

2. You are a shameless liar.

 

Blackvegetable » 28 Aug 2026, 1:58 pm » wrote: ↑

28 Aug 2026, 1:58 pm

1. I'm going to assume that you have 2 hands...rendering much of your armory superfluous. 

So that's a "check".

2. You are a shameless liar.

 

 

1.  I knew you were going there.  Firearms are like tools.  I hav told you that before. There is one for different purposes.  Depending how I am going to carry is how I determine which 9 to carry.  The shotgun and the judge are for defense.  And the 22 PPK is for plinking.  So no, there is no check.  For the record, according to your ignorant definition, your butt buddy roshambo is an ammosexual.

2.  You will have to provide proof.  Post these threads or accept your loss on not only the point, but the topic.  

Here is your question.  You are saying that if you own more than two guns you are an ammosexual.  So a guy who is hunter who has different rifles for different game and has a pistol is an ammosexual (in a negative manner) simply because of the number of guns he has?  

If you don't answer DO NOT ask me any more questions.  

Blackvegetable » 28 Aug 2026, 1:40 pm » wrote: ↑

28 Aug 2026, 1:40 pm

I didn't ask for a retelling. 

Just answer the questions. 

 

You didn't get a retelling.  You got your own words, el DOuche. 

Huey » 28 Aug 2026, 2:16 pm » wrote: ↑

28 Aug 2026, 2:16 pm

You didn't get a retelling.  You got your own words, el DOuche.

 

YOU asked me how many guns I owned when I said I was not an ammosexual.  When I said the definition does not include a number and you for one you implied the number was not relevant.  Make up your **** mind, el Douche.



I don't see a number.  Remember, asshole, you wanted to know how many firearms I owned when I said I am not one.  Sto the **** lying.  Try again.  Also, I am not an extremm supporter of the gun cultrue or the right to bear arms.  Time for you to take a stand in a narrative fashion.



The definitions say nothing about the number of frirearms owned.  YOU tell me how many is too many.  I will only offer now that the number is LESS than it was the last time I answered.



As for number two, speaking of the 2a or discussing  the internal workings of the Sporter does not make one an ammoseuxal according to the Google definition you to look up.  So, you will have to give specific threads to make this point 

Where in this whine are my words?