FJB sucks and swallows
Blackvegetable » 04 Aug 2026, 2:16 pm » wrote: ↑ They file them all the time....
Because they must..
FinCen determines the next step.
You don't know it is "criminal" unless it is determined by a court.Beekeeper » 04 Aug 2026, 2:10 pm » wrote: ↑ Awww. Keep CHASING ME!!
and you left out the part where it says the REASON(s) it is TRIGGERED...
AND for the REAL reasons for filing SARs....
And NOW, since Capital One said in their FILING that NO ACCUSATIONS WERE MADE that any CRIME had been committed, there is, in their OWN WORDS, NO SARs FILED!!!
It must really SUCK being the **** IDIOT YOU ARE, CUMBUCKET!!
Wanna still CHASE ME NOW, ****??![]()
![]()
No need.
You're only kidding yourself......and @ROG62 ......and he's notoriously soft in the head...Beekeeper » 04 Aug 2026, 2:41 pm » wrote: ↑ No, you aren't.
Some vapid attempt to cover your mutilated *** isn't qualified anything, just more of your usual "I am smarter than everyone" **** you croak daily.
Now, keep chasing me!! This is fun!!![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
Blackvegetable » 04 Aug 2026, 2:46 pm » wrote: ↑ You're only kidding yourself......and @ROG62 ......and he's notoriously soft in the head...
Sleep has the exact same symptons as psychosis. And you fear Wokeism.
There is ONLY a requirement to file a SARs when CRIMINAL ACTIVITY IS SUSPECTED!!!Blackvegetable » 04 Aug 2026, 6:18 am » wrote: ↑ Allow me to explain.
If it was FLAGGED but no SAR was filed, a lot of people would lose their jobs.
No....Beekeeper » 05 Aug 2026, 7:15 pm » wrote: ↑ There is ONLY a requirement to file a SARs when CRIMINAL ACTIVITY IS SUSPECTED!!!
Search and Rescue..
You run an AML Dept.Beekeeper » 06 Aug 2026, 5:46 am » wrote: ↑ Yes.
SAR Filing RulesCHASE ME SOME MORE, cupcake!!
- Standard of Suspicion: Banks are only legally required to file a SAR through the Financial Crimes Enforcement Network (FinCEN) if they "know, suspect, or have reason to suspect" that a transaction involves criminal activity or violates the Bank Secrecy Act
Blackvegetable » 06 Aug 2026, 6:10 am » wrote: ↑ You run an AML Dept.
Your employer is fined, and you will have a narrative attached to your publ8c FINRA profile if regulators conclude that your process failed to identify a series of "suspicious" transactions....
There is NO sanction in the event your SAR was mistakenly filed for a non criminal transaction.
As the dept manager are YOU going to try to determine whether a transaction is "criminal", or are you going to file SARs for ALL transactions which demonstrates the general characteristic of those considered reportable in your firm's WSP?
AML applies equally to commercial banks.
Are you trying to PAD THE *** KICKING or just plain **** STUPID??Your employer is fined, and you will have a narrative attached to your publ8c FINRA profile if regulators conclude that your process failed to identify a series of "suspicious" transactions.
Because AML also applies to "registered persons".Beekeeper » 06 Aug 2026, 6:34 am » wrote: ↑ That's NOT what you said, ****!!
Are you trying to PAD THE *** KICKING or just plain **** STUPID??