Liberal Forum

Blackvegetable » 17 Aug 2026, 8:32 am » wrote: ↑

17 Aug 2026, 8:32 am

What a lying coward...

ok you lying bitch

FJB » 17 Aug 2026, 8:35 am » wrote: ↑

17 Aug 2026, 8:35 am

ok you lying bitch

blah bah lah blah blah..  Can't wait till you figure out what discovery is..

In the $10 billion defamation lawsuit filed by U.S. President Donald Trump against the BBC, the pre-trial discovery process has escalated with the broadcaster asking a federal court to help subpoena members of the Trump family, while Trump recently amended his complaint to avoid disclosing his private financial records.Recent Developments in DiscoveryIn mid-August 2026, the BBC filed a motion requesting a U.S. court's assistance to obtain documents and deposition testimony from Donald Trump Jr., Ivanka Trump, and Jared Kushner. The broadcaster argues these family members possess firsthand knowledge regarding what Trump intended to communicate during his January 6, 2021, speech at the Ellipse. The BBC turned to the court after Trump refused to accept the subpoenas on his family’s behalf or direct the Secret Service to allow physical service.Key Areas of Discovery ConflictThe discovery phase has become a high-stakes battle over private logs and sensitive documents:The Trump Family Subpoenas: The BBC wants to question Trump's children about the revision of his speech in the Oval Office and communications immediately after violence erupted at the Capitol. The judge gave Trump's legal team until Friday, August 21, 2026, to formally respond.The Financial Shield: In July 2026, a Miami judge ordered Trump to hand over detailed financial performance records of the hundreds of businesses tied to his revocable trust. To block this order, Trump successfully petitioned Judge Roy K. Altman on August 10, 2026, to narrow his complaint. The updated lawsuit drops claims of corporate financial harm and focuses entirely on personal reputation damage, allowing his team to argue the financial logs are no longer relevant.Communications and Diaries: The BBC's legal team has also demanded access to Trump's personal phone logs from January 6, 2021, alongside his personal diary entries from the two months leading up to that date.Background of the Defamation LawsuitThe legal battle stems from a BBC Panorama documentary titled Trump: A Second Chance?, which aired shortly before the 2024 presidential election.The Spliced Clip: The lawsuit alleges that the BBC deceptively edited a clip of Trump's speech by splicing together separate remarks—one telling supporters to march to the Capitol and another telling them to "fight like hell"—while omitting his call to protest "peacefully and patriotically".The BBC's Defense: While the BBC issued a public apology for the misleading edit and senior executives resigned, the network maintains that the error does not constitute legal defamation or show actual malice.Jurisdiction Argument: The BBC is still pushing for a total dismissal of the case. They argue that the Florida federal court lacks jurisdiction because the documentary was never broadcast on U.S. television or its domestic subscription platforms.Watch this analysis of the legal complexities and jurisdictional disputes surrounding the BBC's efforts to dismiss the multibillion-dollar case:10mTrump takes first win in BBC lawsuit193K views · 6 months agoYouTube · LBCIf the case survives the BBC's pending motions to dismiss, a federal trial is provisionally scheduled to begin in February 2027.
 

JohnnyYou » 17 Aug 2026, 9:57 am » wrote: ↑

17 Aug 2026, 9:57 am

blah bah lah blah blah..  Can't wait till you figure out what discovery is..

In the $10 billion defamation lawsuit filed by U.S. President Donald Trump against the BBC, the pre-trial discovery process has escalated with the broadcaster asking a federal court to help subpoena members of the Trump family, while Trump recently amended his complaint to avoid disclosing his private financial records.Recent Developments in DiscoveryIn mid-August 2026, the BBC filed a motion requesting a U.S. court's assistance to obtain documents and deposition testimony from Donald Trump Jr., Ivanka Trump, and Jared Kushner. The broadcaster argues these family members possess firsthand knowledge regarding what Trump intended to communicate during his January 6, 2021, speech at the Ellipse. The BBC turned to the court after Trump refused to accept the subpoenas on his family’s behalf or direct the Secret Service to allow physical service.Key Areas of Discovery ConflictThe discovery phase has become a high-stakes battle over private logs and sensitive documents:The Trump Family Subpoenas: The BBC wants to question Trump's children about the revision of his speech in the Oval Office and communications immediately after violence erupted at the Capitol. The judge gave Trump's legal team until Friday, August 21, 2026, to formally respond.The Financial Shield: In July 2026, a Miami judge ordered Trump to hand over detailed financial performance records of the hundreds of businesses tied to his revocable trust. To block this order, Trump successfully petitioned Judge Roy K. Altman on August 10, 2026, to narrow his complaint. The updated lawsuit drops claims of corporate financial harm and focuses entirely on personal reputation damage, allowing his team to argue the financial logs are no longer relevant.Communications and Diaries: The BBC's legal team has also demanded access to Trump's personal phone logs from January 6, 2021, alongside his personal diary entries from the two months leading up to that date.Background of the Defamation LawsuitThe legal battle stems from a BBC Panorama documentary titled Trump: A Second Chance?, which aired shortly before the 2024 presidential election.The Spliced Clip: The lawsuit alleges that the BBC deceptively edited a clip of Trump's speech by splicing together separate remarks—one telling supporters to march to the Capitol and another telling them to "fight like hell"—while omitting his call to protest "peacefully and patriotically".The BBC's Defense: While the BBC issued a public apology for the misleading edit and senior executives resigned, the network maintains that the error does not constitute legal defamation or show actual malice.Jurisdiction Argument: The BBC is still pushing for a total dismissal of the case. They argue that the Florida federal court lacks jurisdiction because the documentary was never broadcast on U.S. television or its domestic subscription platforms.Watch this analysis of the legal complexities and jurisdictional disputes surrounding the BBC's efforts to dismiss the multibillion-dollar case:10mTrump takes first win in BBC lawsuit193K views · 6 months agoYouTube · LBCIf the case survives the BBC's pending motions to dismiss, a federal trial is provisionally scheduled to begin in February 2027.

you really need to GTFO of this Country

FJB » 17 Aug 2026, 9:58 am » wrote: ↑

17 Aug 2026, 9:58 am

you really need to GTFO of this Country

You wouldn't survive with only 37% MAGA dumb azzes left here..  America would be Chinese in a week.

Canada Rocks..  I ponder it often. I would rather put up with wildfires and freezing cold than can keep living in this country with idiots like you.

Your exclusive head up the America First Areshole Club is dwindling in size..  The thrill is gone. It's just poop in the diaper now.
 

JohnnyYou » 17 Aug 2026, 10:06 am » wrote: ↑

17 Aug 2026, 10:06 am

You wouldn't survive with only 37% MAGA dumb azzes left here..  America would be Chinese in a week.

Canada Rocks..  I ponder it often. I would rather put up with wildfires and freezing cold than can keep living in this country with idiots like you.

Your exclusive head up the America First Areshole Club is dwindling in size..  The thrill is gone. It's just poop in the diaper now.

Remember what admiral Yamamoto once said? 

goes something like this.... If we invade American, there will be a rifle behind every blade of grass. 

The Chinese would not stand a chance