"What country can preserve its liberties if their rulers are not warned from time to time that their people preserve the spirit of resistance. Let them take arms."Blackvegetable » 50 minutes ago » wrote: ↑How many of the people you quoted were as SPECIFICALLY qualified to comment on the constitutional question as the former Chief Justice?Huey » 51 minutes ago » wrote: ↑ “. . . I also believe we can respect Second Amendment rights while, at the same time, preventing lawbreakers and people who are a danger to others from committing atrocities . . .”
― Mark M. Bello, Betrayal High
Just another context...
It's unbearable.. I am actually looking for Trump saluting the North Korean Generals.RebelGator » 6 minutes ago » wrote: ↑ "The right to bare arms is just embarrassing for me, I can't even wear a sun dress".....Black Vegetable.
Johnny,JohnnyYou » 7 minutes ago » wrote: ↑ It's unbearable.. I am actually looking for Trump saluting the North Korean Generals.
https://i.postimg.cc/sfvt3YPf/Super-Dup ... e-2024.png
"The laws that forbid the carrying of arms are laws of such a nature. They disarm only those who are neither inclined nor determined to commit crimes.... Such laws make things worse for the assaulted and better for the assailants; they serve rather to encourage than to prevent homicides, for an unarmed man may be attacked with greater confidence than an armed man."Blackvegetable » Today, 7:53 am » wrote: ↑How many of the people you quoted were as SPECIFICALLY qualified to comment on the constitutional question as the former Chief Justice?Huey » Today, 7:51 am » wrote: ↑ “. . . I also believe we can respect Second Amendment rights while, at the same time, preventing lawbreakers and people who are a danger to others from committing atrocities . . .”
― Mark M. Bello, Betrayal High
Just another context...
And another:Blackvegetable » Today, 7:53 am » wrote: ↑ How many of the people you quoted were as SPECIFICALLY qualified to comment on the constitutional question as the former Chief Justice?
Just another context...
You weigh 145...Huey » 2 minutes ago » wrote: ↑ And another:
"To disarm the people...s the most effectual way to enslave them."
- George Mason, referencing advice given to the British Parliament by Pennsylvania governor Sir William Keith, The Debates in the Several State Conventions on the Adooption of the Federal Constitution, June 14, 1788
Snd another that knows better than Burger:Blackvegetable » 5 minutes ago » wrote: ↑You weigh 145...Huey » 7 minutes ago » wrote: ↑ And another:
"To disarm the people...s the most effectual way to enslave them."
- George Mason, referencing advice given to the British Parliament by Pennsylvania governor Sir William Keith, The Debates in the Several State Conventions on the Adooption of the Federal Constitution, June 14, 1788
The oppressors wouldn't waste the bullet...they'd just wait for the wind to pick up...
Before a standing army can rule, the people must be disarmed, as they are in almost every country in Europe. The supreme power in America cannot enforce unjust laws by the sword; because the whole body of the people are armed, and constitute a force superior to any band of regular troops."Blackvegetable » Today, 7:53 am » wrote: ↑How many of the people you quoted were as SPECIFICALLY qualified to comment on the constitutional question as the former Chief Justice?Huey » Today, 7:51 am » wrote: ↑ “. . . I also believe we can respect Second Amendment rights while, at the same time, preventing lawbreakers and people who are a danger to others from committing atrocities . . .”
― Mark M. Bello, Betrayal High
Just another context...
Do you even understand what SCOTUS does?Huey » 27 minutes ago » wrote: ↑ Snd another that knows better than Burger:
"I ask who are the militia? They consist now of the whole people, except a few public officers."
- George Mason, Address to the Virginia Ratifying Convention, June 4, 1788
Blackvegetable » 4 minutes ago » wrote: ↑Do you even understand what SCOTUS does?Huey » 27 minutes ago » wrote: ↑ Snd another that knows better than Burger:
"I ask who are the militia? They consist now of the whole people, except a few public officers."
- George Mason, Address to the Virginia Ratifying Convention, June 4, 1788
I take that as a "no"...Huey » 11 minutes ago » wrote: ↑ “A militia when properly formed are in fact the people themselves…and include, according to the past and general usuage of the states, all men capable of bearing arms… "To preserve liberty, it is essential that the whole body of the people always possess arms, and be taught alike, especially when young, how to use them."
- Richard Henry Lee, Federal Farmer No. 18, January 25, 1788
Do you even understand what SCOTUS does?
[1]"[It] surely elevates above all other interests the right of law-abiding, responsible citizens to use arms in defense of hearth and home."
Blackvegetable » 5 minutes ago » wrote: ↑I take that as a "no"...Huey » 16 minutes ago » wrote: ↑ “A militia when properly formed are in fact the people themselves…and include, according to the past and general usuage of the states, all men capable of bearing arms… "To preserve liberty, it is essential that the whole body of the people always possess arms, and be taught alike, especially when young, how to use them."
- Richard Henry Lee, Federal Farmer No. 18, January 25, 1788
And another one:"Guard with jealous attention the public liberty. Suspect everyone who approaches that jewel. Unfortunately, nothing will preserve it but downright force. Whenever you give up that force, you are ruined.... The great object is that every man be armed. Everyone who is able might have a gun."Blackvegetable » Today, 7:53 am » wrote: ↑How many of the people you quoted were as SPECIFICALLY qualified to comment on the constitutional question as the former Chief Justice?Huey » Today, 7:51 am » wrote: ↑ “. . . I also believe we can respect Second Amendment rights while, at the same time, preventing lawbreakers and people who are a danger to others from committing atrocities . . .”
― Mark M. Bello, Betrayal High
Just another context...
DebunkedHuey » 27 minutes ago » wrote: ↑ Do you even understand what SCOTUS does?
Key Quotes from District of Columbia v. HellerOn Public Carry Rights (Bruen, 2022): Justice Thomas noted that American history generally did not show broad prohibitions on carrying firearms for personal defense in public.
- On Individual Rights and Self-Defense:
[1]
On Equal Constitutional Status (Bruen, 2022): He emphasized that the right to bear arms is not inferior to other Bill of Rights guarantees.On the Scope of the Second Amendment (Bruen, 2022): He affirmed that the Amendment protects "all Americans" in keeping and bearing arms for various purposes, including self-defense.
My bad. Should have been scroll. Some code is preventing me from using the quote function so here is a repost:
[1]"[It] surely elevates above all other interests the right of law-abiding, responsible citizens to use arms in defense of hearth and home."
Huey » 13 minutes ago » wrote: ↑ My bad. Should have been scroll. Some code is preventing me from using the quote function so here is a repost:
Do you even understand what SCOTUS does?
Key Quotes from District of Columbia v. HellerOn Public Carry Rights (Bruen, 2022): Justice Thomas noted that American history generally did not show broad prohibitions on carrying firearms for personal defense in public.
- On Individual Rights and Self-Defense:
[1]
On Equal Constitutional Status (Bruen, 2022): He emphasized that the right to bear arms is not inferior to other Bill of Rights guarantees.On the Scope of the Second Amendment (Bruen, 2022): He affirmed that the Amendment protects "all Americans" in keeping and bearing arms for various purposes, including self-defense.