Liberal Forum

Blackvegetable » Today, 7:29 am » wrote: ↑

Today, 7:29 am

Huey: » Today, 7:29 am » wrote: ↑

Today, 7:29 am

No...

You lied..

We don't proceed therefrom.
 

Please posted in your own words what I lied about.

Where were you asked to meet?

Huey » Today, 7:35 am » wrote: ↑

Today, 7:35 am

You already know.  You have already posted it and have already been answered.  

If you want me to answer AGAIN, answer the below question:

Where were you asked to meet me?

You already know.  You have already posted it and have already been answered.  

 I always have to answer my questions..


But you refuse to acknowledge it.

 

If you want me to answer AGAIN,

I want you to tell me if the two conditions are mutually exclusive.

I'm still waiting...

I'm sure I'll have to answer. 

Blackvegetable » Today, 7:39 am » wrote: ↑

Today, 7:39 am

 I always have to answer my questions..


But you refuse to acknowledge it.

 


I want you to tell me if the two conditions are mutually exclusive.

I'm still waiting...

I'm sure I'll have to answer. 

 

You already know.  You have already posted it and have already been answered.  

If you want me to answer AGAIN, answer the below question:

Where were you asked to meet me?
 

Huey » Today, 7:42 am » wrote: ↑

Today, 7:42 am

You already know.  

Are they mutually exclusive?

Blackvegetable » Today, 7:44 am » wrote: ↑

Today, 7:44 am

Are they mutually exclusive?

 

You already know.  You have already posted it and have already been answered.  

If you want me to answer AGAIN, answer the below question:

Where were you asked to meet me?
 

Huey » Today, 7:47 am » wrote: ↑

Today, 7:47 am

You already know.  You have already posted it and have already been answered.  

If you want me to answer AGAIN, answer the below question:

Where were you asked to meet me?

You haven't answered.

Neither of us has any way to know if you know...

Your rule.
 

Blackvegetable » Today, 7:55 am » wrote: ↑

Today, 7:55 am

You haven't answered.

Neither of us has any way to know if you know...

Your rule.
 

 

You know where I stayed.  I have told you.  You post it this morning.

Where were you asked to meet me?  One word answer.
 

Huey » Today, 7:57 am » wrote: ↑

Today, 7:57 am

You know where I stayed. 

You must focus...


Are the statements

You stopped 42 miles short


and

You never strayed closer than 33 miles


mutually exclusive?

Blackvegetable » Today, 8:04 am » wrote: ↑

Today, 8:04 am

You must focus...

Are the statements

You stopped 42 miles short

and

You never strayed closer than 33 miles

mutually exclusive?

Now you are reframing some more.

What you said 23 May 2025:

Does your sig acknowledge that you never came closer than 33 miles?

viewtopic.php?p=2747521#p2747521

And what reframed to:

You never strayed closer than 33 miles

Where were you asked to meet me?

 
 

Blackvegetable » Today, 6:06 am » wrote: ↑

Today, 6:06 am

What are you paying for gasoline?

Last gas I bought last week was $3.24

Sucks for you, huh?? It's NOT MY FAULT that your single digit IQ is too  **** LOW that you can't figure out how to get MASSIVE discounts on gas like us HIGH 167 IQ people do!!

Told you, ****, to EDUCATE YOURSELF IN COMMON SENSE THINGS and you will get "smarter"!!

You're an IDIOT!!

Huey » Today, 8:12 am » wrote: ↑

Today, 8:12 am

Now you are reframing some more.

What you said 23 May 52025:

Does your sig acknowledge that you never came closer than 33 miles?

viewtopic.php?p=2747521#p2747521

And what reframed to:

You never strayed closer than 33 miles

Where were you asked to meet me?

I paraphrased


Not that it makes any difference whatsoever..

Are the statements 

You stopped 42 miles short


and

Does your sig acknowledge that you never came closer than 33 miles?


mutually exclusive?
 

Blackvegetable » Today, 8:21 am » wrote: ↑

Today, 8:21 am

I paraphrased


Not that it makes any difference whatsoever..

Are the statements 

You stopped 42 miles short


and

Does your sig acknowledge that you never came closer than 33 miles?


mutually exclusive?
 


 

Where were you asked to meet me?  And as a bonus, were you not told you had 5 days to do so where I asked you to meet me?

PS.  That is not a paraphrase.  That is a dishonest attempt to reframe the discussion.
 

Huey » Today, 8:23 am » wrote: ↑

Today, 8:23 am

Where were 

we'll deal with that...again, next.

Answer the question. 

Blackvegetable » Today, 8:25 am » wrote: ↑

Today, 8:25 am

we'll deal with that...again, next.

Answer the question. 

 

No, we will deal with it now.  I have been down this road of diversion and irrelevancy with you before.

Where were you asked to meet me?  And as a bonus, were you not told you had 5 days to do so where I asked you to meet me?

PS.  That is not a paraphrase.  That is a dishonest attempt to reframe the discussion.

Huey » Today, 8:31 am » wrote: ↑

Today, 8:31 am

No, we will deal with it now.  I have been down this road of diversion and irrelevancy with you before.


 

You are insisting that one of those statements is a lie.

which is a lie.

 

Huey » Today, 8:31 am » wrote: ↑

Today, 8:31 am

No, we will deal with it now.  I have been down this road of diversion and irrelevancy with you before.

Where were you asked to meet me?  And as a bonus, were you not told you had 5 days to do so where I asked you to meet me?

PS.  That is not a paraphrase.  That is a dishonest attempt to reframe the discussion.

 

No, we will deal with it now.  I have been down this road of diversion and irrelevancy with you before.

Where were you asked to meet me?  And as a bonus, were you not told you had 5 days to do so where I asked you to meet me?

PS.  That is not a paraphrase.  That is a dishonest attempt to reframe the discussion.
 

Blackvegetable » Yesterday, 5:47 pm » wrote: ↑

Yesterday, 5:47 pm

Why?

Your claim, your job. 

Not to mention that you would demand everyone else to provide evidence if it was them making the claim, hypocrite boy.


Riverside - All you need is a concept.

Vegas » Today, 9:41 am » wrote: ↑

Today, 9:41 am

Your claim, your job. 

Not to mention that you would demand everyone else to provide evidence if it was them making the claim, hypocrite boy.

Riverside - All you need is a concept.

then what happens?

Huey » Today, 8:31 am » wrote: ↑

Today, 8:31 am

No, we will deal with it now.  I have been down this road of diversion and irrelevancy with you before.

Where were you asked to meet me?  And as a bonus, were you not told you had 5 days to do so where I asked you to meet me?

PS.  That is not a paraphrase.  That is a dishonest attempt to reframe the discussion.

Welshy,

"Now" is never for you....

 

Blackvegetable » Today, 10:03 am » wrote: ↑

Today, 10:03 am

Welshy,

"Now" is never for you....

 

 

You'll never now because you have never tried.  The few time we have done a one for one I answered all of your questions.  

No, we will deal with it now.  I have been down this road of diversion and irrelevancy with you before.

Where were you asked to meet me?  And as a bonus, were you not told you had 5 days to do so where I asked you to meet me?

PS.  That is not a paraphrase.  That is a dishonest attempt to reframe the discussion.