Please posted in your own words what I lied about.No...
You lied..
We don't proceed therefrom.
Huey » 11 Aug 2026, 7:35 am » wrote: ↑ You already know. You have already posted it and have already been answered.
If you want me to answer AGAIN, answer the below question:
Where were you asked to meet me?
I always have to answer my questions..You already know. You have already posted it and have already been answered.
I want you to tell me if the two conditions are mutually exclusive.If you want me to answer AGAIN,
You already know. You have already posted it and have already been answered.Blackvegetable » 11 Aug 2026, 7:39 am » wrote: ↑ I always have to answer my questions..
But you refuse to acknowledge it.
I want you to tell me if the two conditions are mutually exclusive.
I'm still waiting...
I'm sure I'll have to answer.
Are they mutually exclusive?
You already know. You have already posted it and have already been answered.
You haven't answered.Huey » 11 Aug 2026, 7:47 am » wrote: ↑ You already know. You have already posted it and have already been answered.
If you want me to answer AGAIN, answer the below question:
Where were you asked to meet me?
You know where I stayed. I have told you. You post it this morning.Blackvegetable » 11 Aug 2026, 7:55 am » wrote: ↑ You haven't answered.
Neither of us has any way to know if you know...
Your rule.
You must focus...
Now you are reframing some more.Blackvegetable » 11 Aug 2026, 8:04 am » wrote: ↑ You must focus...
Are the statements
You stopped 42 miles short
and
You never strayed closer than 33 miles
mutually exclusive?
I paraphrasedHuey » 11 Aug 2026, 8:12 am » wrote: ↑ Now you are reframing some more.
What you said 23 May 52025:
Does your sig acknowledge that you never came closer than 33 miles?
viewtopic.php?p=2747521#p2747521
And what reframed to:
You never strayed closer than 33 miles
Where were you asked to meet me?
Where were you asked to meet me? And as a bonus, were you not told you had 5 days to do so where I asked you to meet me?Blackvegetable » 11 Aug 2026, 8:21 am » wrote: ↑ I paraphrased
Not that it makes any difference whatsoever..
Are the statements
You stopped 42 miles short
and
Does your sig acknowledge that you never came closer than 33 miles?
mutually exclusive?
we'll deal with that...again, next.
No, we will deal with it now. I have been down this road of diversion and irrelevancy with you before.Blackvegetable » 11 Aug 2026, 8:25 am » wrote: ↑ we'll deal with that...again, next.
Answer the question.
You are insisting that one of those statements is a lie.Huey » 11 Aug 2026, 8:31 am » wrote: ↑ No, we will deal with it now. I have been down this road of diversion and irrelevancy with you before.
No, we will deal with it now. I have been down this road of diversion and irrelevancy with you before.Huey » 11 Aug 2026, 8:31 am » wrote: ↑ No, we will deal with it now. I have been down this road of diversion and irrelevancy with you before.
Where were you asked to meet me? And as a bonus, were you not told you had 5 days to do so where I asked you to meet me?
PS. That is not a paraphrase. That is a dishonest attempt to reframe the discussion.
then what happens?Vegas » 11 Aug 2026, 9:41 am » wrote: ↑ Your claim, your job.
Not to mention that you would demand everyone else to provide evidence if it was them making the claim, hypocrite boy.
Riverside - All you need is a concept.
Huey » 11 Aug 2026, 8:31 am » wrote: ↑ No, we will deal with it now. I have been down this road of diversion and irrelevancy with you before.
Where were you asked to meet me? And as a bonus, were you not told you had 5 days to do so where I asked you to meet me?
PS. That is not a paraphrase. That is a dishonest attempt to reframe the discussion.
You'll never now because you have never tried. The few time we have done a one for one I answered all of your questions.