Liberal Forum

Cannonpointer » Yesterday, 10:44 pm » wrote: ↑

Yesterday, 10:44 pm

I did. URGENTLY.

Wait - do you mean ask it of you? I asked it of Buck Naked.

He responded, "What?"

 

Cannonpointer » Yesterday, 10:48 pm » wrote: ↑

Yesterday, 10:48 pm

Not knowing the difference between male and female is pretty threatening to credibility, I must say.

Worse, after arguing women can have dicks, he brags about his prowess with women.         

are you implying he’s a “chicks with dicks” kind of guy?   
 

Rules?
**** rules.

Squatchman » Today, 7:50 am » wrote: ↑

Today, 7:50 am

Rules?
**** rules.

 

Your gun grabbing buddy is big on them.  

Blackvegetable » Today, 5:23 am » wrote: ↑

Today, 5:23 am

there's "defining"

And there's "knowing"....

And there's your proclivities with "women", whom we are assured by you can, and often do, have penises. 
 
 

ROG62 » Today, 5:36 am » wrote: ↑

Today, 5:36 am

are you implying he’s a “chicks with dicks” kind of guy? 

I'm saying HE says so.

I NEVER claimed that women have penises. He did.

And then he bragged about his exploits with "women".
 

Cannonpointer » Today, 8:05 am » wrote: ↑

Today, 8:05 am

And there's your proclivities with "women", whom we are assured by you can, and often do, have penises.

Would you quote me on that?

Not a precis....verbatim...


 

Cannonpointer » Today, 8:07 am » wrote: ↑

Today, 8:07 am

I'm saying HE says so.

I NEVER claimed that women have penises. He did.

And then he bragged about his exploits with "women".

the way I see it, he’s;

A) “defined” women by stating some have dicks…
B) “knowing” is defined by getting to know some of those same said, “chicks with dicks intimately…
 

Blackvegetable » Today, 8:08 am » wrote: ↑

Today, 8:08 am

Would you quote me on that?

Not a precis....verbatim...


 

 

Remember the rule....he just knows.


PS.  Feel very lucky that the archive only goes back so far.  I remember your thread about where you were contemplating dating a tranny.  
 

Huey » Today, 8:43 am » wrote: ↑

Today, 8:43 am

Remember the rule....he just knows.


 

Stalky,

There is no such rule.

Blackvegetable » Today, 9:09 am » wrote: ↑

Today, 9:09 am

Stalky,

There is no such rule.

 

I KNEW ABOUT IT ON THE 2ND.....

I HAD PROOF.

**** idiot.

viewtopic.php?p=2919034#p2919034
 

Huey » Today, 9:16 am » wrote: ↑

Today, 9:16 am

I KNEW ABOUT IT ON THE 2ND.....

I HAD PROOF.

**** idiot.

viewtopic.php?p=2919034#p2919034

So where is the rule?

Blackvegetable » Today, 9:17 am » wrote: ↑

Today, 9:17 am

So where is the rule?

 

Right here.  You words.

I KNEW ABOUT IT ON THE 2ND.....

I HAD PROOF.

**** idiot.

viewtopic.php?p=2919034#p2919034

If it is good enough for you it is good enough for everyone.  

Huey » Today, 9:18 am » wrote: ↑

Today, 9:18 am

Right here.  You words.

I KNEW ABOUT IT ON THE 2ND.....

I HAD PROOF.

**** idiot.

viewtopic.php?p=2919034#p2919034

If it is good enough for you it is good enough for everyone.

Those are statements of fact which contradict your lie.


 

Blackvegetable » Today, 9:21 am » wrote: ↑

Today, 9:21 am

Those are statements of fact which contradict your lie.


 

 

You can discuss that on your thread.
 

Huey » Today, 9:28 am » wrote: ↑

Today, 9:28 am

You can discuss that on your thread.

It's not a matter of "discussion"...it's a matter of fact, debunking your OP....

Huey » Yesterday, 2:24 pm » wrote: ↑

Yesterday, 2:24 pm

In the future when he asks you for a link all you have to say is you knew about it.  Apparently, that is his new standard.

I KNEW ABOUT IT ON THE 2ND.....

I HAD PROOF.

**** idiot.

viewtopic.php?p=2919034#p2919034

Whenever he demands a repost (which is pretty much daily) of things from months or years ago, especially the things that he already knows, then I charge him an inconvenience tax. Essentially, he first must be banned to the watercooler room for 3 days, then he will get his repost. 


He demands reposts for two reasons: 1. Control. He likes the idea of people fetching something for him. It's just a narcist thing. 2. Stalling. When he is cornered, he needs time to figure out how to weasel out if it. 

@Blackvegetable  

Blackvegetable » Today, 9:31 am » wrote: ↑

Today, 9:31 am

It's not a matter of "discussion"...it's a matter of fact, debunking your OP....

 

It is a demonstration of your "rules for thee but not for me" method of posting.

Huey » Today, 10:03 am » wrote: ↑

Today, 10:03 am

It is a demonstration of your "rules for thee but not for me" method of posting.

You posted no rule...You posted statements of fact...directly contradicting your OP.

Blackvegetable » Today, 10:04 am » wrote: ↑

Today, 10:04 am

You posted no rule...You posted statements of fact...directly contradicting your OP.