Between we two, only you find the child "provocative."Blackvegetable » 52 minutes ago » wrote: ↑ Confessions of A Fat Young Ecdysiast
"He groomed me to be this provocative!"
Your steady companion for years...Cannonpointer » 32 minutes ago » wrote: ↑ Between we two, only you find the child "provocative."
I remain firmly in the no chubs camp.
You are the only one I wagged him at.Blackvegetable » 30 minutes ago » wrote: ↑ Your steady companion for years...
What happened?
Did his voice crack?
Now you find children provocative? I knew you lusred after 20 year old women in public and were into trannies, but this?Blackvegetable » Yesterday, 7:57 pm » wrote: ↑ Confessions of A Fat Young Ecdysiast
"He groomed me to be this provocative!"
Stalky,Huey » 29 minutes ago » wrote: ↑ Now you find children provocative? I knew you lusred after 20 year old women in public and were into trannies, but this?
Cannonpointer » Yesterday, 8:27 pm » wrote: ↑ You are the only one I wagged him at.
Study on it, son.
:die:
Not at all. You wish to discuss your new rule on links?
I have no such rule. That thread is one of the biggest failures in lfn history..
Blackvegetable » 12 minutes ago » wrote: ↑ I have no such rule. That thread is one of the biggest failures in lfn history..
How about your rule on things you "didn't see"?
Three unimpeachable facts..Huey » 6 minutes ago » wrote: ↑ I KNEW ABOUT IT ON THE 2ND.....
I HAD PROOF.
**** idiot.
viewtopic.php?p=2919034#p2919034
Not my job.
You made a claim about his OP. Your job.
And I posted the evidence.Vegas » 4 minutes ago » wrote: ↑ You made a claim about his OP. Your job.
I didn't make the rule. It's called logic you dumb mother ****.
Prove that posting the evidence you demanded is "stalking"