Liberal Forum

*Roshambo » Today, 9:31 am » wrote: ↑

Today, 9:31 am

Thats not a wedding ring; crackerjack prize


 

Guess again, Dumbest Mofo Alive:


Silicone Wedding Rings.  Where the **** you been, DMA?

Huey » Today, 10:01 am » wrote: ↑

Today, 10:01 am

Guess again, Dumbest Mofo Alive:


Silicone Wedding Rings.  Where the **** you been, DMA?

Equivalent to a crackerjack prize
you spent more money on prostitution than your wedding ring
 
 

*Roshambo » Today, 10:02 am » wrote: ↑

Today, 10:02 am

Equivalent to a crackerjack prize
you spent more money on prostitution than your wedding ring
 
 

 

That is not my original Wedding ring, DMA.  Many people wear those.  And at least I know images are reversed in a mirror.  

What else ya got, bitter one?  Brig it on.  You can do much better.  You are bush league at this.

Huey » Today, 10:06 am » wrote: ↑

Today, 10:06 am

That is not my original Wedding ring, DMA.  Many people wear those.  And at least I know images are reversed in a mirror.  

What else ya got, bitter one?  Brig it on.  You can do much better.  You are bush league at this.

 

*Roshambo » Today, 10:02 am » wrote: ↑

Today, 10:02 am

Equivalent to a crackerjack prize
you spent more money on prostitution than your wedding ring

"Who are you who is so wise in the Chronicles of @*HooooeyVagina?"

Huey » Today, 10:06 am » wrote: ↑

Today, 10:06 am

That is not my original Wedding ring, DMA.  Many people wear those.  And at least I know images are reversed in a mirror.  

What else ya got, bitter one?  Brig it on.  You can do much better.  You are bush league at this.

You didn't always know that...
 

Blackvegetable » Today, 10:38 am » wrote: ↑

Today, 10:38 am

"Who are you who is so wise in the Chronicles of @*HooooeyVagina?"

He posted that he patronized a sex worker and for all I know it could have been a man in a dress.
 

*Roshambo » Today, 10:41 am » wrote: ↑

Today, 10:41 am

He posted that he patronized a sex worker and for all I know it could have been a man in a dress.

For all he knows, and cared at the time, it probably was...

Blackvegetable » Today, 10:42 am » wrote: ↑

Today, 10:42 am

For all he knows, and cared at the time, it probably was...

that silly ring doubles as his “you know what” Ring
 

*Roshambo » Today, 10:41 am » wrote: ↑

Today, 10:41 am

He posted that he patronized a sex worker and for all I know it could have been a man in a dress.
Surely one visit costs more than that silly ring that doubles as his “you know what” Ring


 

I can assure you I am not BV and would not even contemplate being with a man in dress.

And I told you, that is not the original ring.  that is in a safe somewhere.  Many people wear those silicon rings as well as understanding a reflection in a mirror is reversed.

But hey, keep 'em coming.  This is too easy for me
 
 

Huey » Today, 10:46 am » wrote: ↑

Today, 10:46 am

I can assure you I am not BV and would not even contemplate being with a man in dress.

And I told you, that is not the original ring.  that is in a safe somewhere.  Many people wear those silicon rings as well as understanding a reflection in a mirror is reversed.

But hey, keep 'em coming.  This is too easy for me

Dual purpose ring
 

Huey » Today, 10:46 am » wrote: ↑

Today, 10:46 am

I can assure you I am not BV and would not even contemplate being with a man in dress.

And I told you, that is not the original ring.  that is in a safe somewhere.  Many people wear those silicon rings as well as understanding a reflection in a mirror is reversed.

But hey, keep 'em coming.  This is too easy for me

'Shamboner knows his rings, he married his sweetheart in the bathtub....it was a double ring ceremony. 

*Roshambo » Today, 10:47 am » wrote: ↑

Today, 10:47 am

Dual purpose ring
 

 

No, they are sold as wedding bands:

https://www.jared.com/black-silicone-we ... gJ6YfD_BwE

You got to try harder.  Maybe a little research on your end would prevent you from coming across as the DMA.


 

RebelGator » Today, 10:51 am » wrote: ↑

Today, 10:51 am

'Shamboner knows his rings, he married his sweetheart in the bathtub....it was a double ring ceremony. 

 

     

*Roshambo » Today, 10:45 am » wrote: ↑

Today, 10:45 am

that silly ring doubles as his “you know what” Ring

After a roll of duct tape.

*Roshambo » Today, 10:45 am » wrote: ↑

Today, 10:45 am

that silly ring doubles as his “you know what” Ring
 

 

You and @Blackvegetable  certainly are losers.  Spendng all this time entertaining with your weak retorts.

Huey » Today, 10:46 am » wrote: ↑

Today, 10:46 am

I can assure you I am not BV and would not even contemplate being with a man in dress.


 

When had BV ever done so?

 

Huey » Today, 11:04 am » wrote: ↑

Today, 11:04 am

You and @Blackvegetable  certainly are losers.  Spendng all this time entertaining with your weak retorts.

Why tag me in your losing battle?
 

Blackvegetable » Today, 11:06 am » wrote: ↑

Today, 11:06 am

When had BV ever done so?

 

 

Goodness, I hate assholes that refer to themselves in the third person.

Sigh, on this forum a few years back you started a thread about whether or not you should go on a date with a tranny.  Fortunately for you the archive only goes back so far. 

Blackvegetable » Today, 11:06 am » wrote: ↑

Today, 11:06 am

Why tag me in your losing battle?
 

 

One, I am not losing and two it is entertaining watching you losers post about me.  You guys are really butt hurt.