Guess again, Dumbest Mofo Alive:

Equivalent to a crackerjack prizeHuey » 11 Aug 2026, 10:01 am » wrote: ↑ Guess again, Dumbest Mofo Alive:
Silicone Wedding Rings. Where the **** you been, DMA?
That is not my original Wedding ring, DMA. Many people wear those. And at least I know images are reversed in a mirror.*Roshambo » 11 Aug 2026, 10:02 am » wrote: ↑ Equivalent to a crackerjack prize
you spent more money on prostitution than your wedding ring
Huey » 11 Aug 2026, 10:06 am » wrote: ↑ That is not my original Wedding ring, DMA. Many people wear those. And at least I know images are reversed in a mirror.
What else ya got, bitter one? Brig it on. You can do much better. You are bush league at this.
"Who are you who is so wise in the Chronicles of @*HooooeyVagina?"*Roshambo » 11 Aug 2026, 10:02 am » wrote: ↑ Equivalent to a crackerjack prize
you spent more money on prostitution than your wedding ring
You didn't always know that...Huey » 11 Aug 2026, 10:06 am » wrote: ↑ That is not my original Wedding ring, DMA. Many people wear those. And at least I know images are reversed in a mirror.
What else ya got, bitter one? Brig it on. You can do much better. You are bush league at this.
He posted that he patronized a sex worker and for all I know it could have been a man in a dress.Blackvegetable » 11 Aug 2026, 10:38 am » wrote: ↑ "Who are you who is so wise in the Chronicles of @*HooooeyVagina?"
For all he knows, and cared at the time, it probably was...*Roshambo » 11 Aug 2026, 10:41 am » wrote: ↑ He posted that he patronized a sex worker and for all I know it could have been a man in a dress.
that silly ring doubles as his “you know what” RingBlackvegetable » 11 Aug 2026, 10:42 am » wrote: ↑ For all he knows, and cared at the time, it probably was...
I can assure you I am not BV and would not even contemplate being with a man in dress.*Roshambo » 11 Aug 2026, 10:41 am » wrote: ↑ He posted that he patronized a sex worker and for all I know it could have been a man in a dress.
Surely one visit costs more than that silly ring that doubles as his “you know what” Ring
Dual purpose ringHuey » 11 Aug 2026, 10:46 am » wrote: ↑ I can assure you I am not BV and would not even contemplate being with a man in dress.
And I told you, that is not the original ring. that is in a safe somewhere. Many people wear those silicon rings as well as understanding a reflection in a mirror is reversed.
But hey, keep 'em coming. This is too easy for me
'Shamboner knows his rings, he married his sweetheart in the bathtub....it was a double ring ceremony.Huey » 11 Aug 2026, 10:46 am » wrote: ↑ I can assure you I am not BV and would not even contemplate being with a man in dress.
And I told you, that is not the original ring. that is in a safe somewhere. Many people wear those silicon rings as well as understanding a reflection in a mirror is reversed.
But hey, keep 'em coming. This is too easy for me
No, they are sold as wedding bands:
RebelGator » 11 Aug 2026, 10:51 am » wrote: ↑ 'Shamboner knows his rings, he married his sweetheart in the bathtub....it was a double ring ceremony.
After a roll of duct tape.
You and @Blackvegetable certainly are losers. Spendng all this time entertaining with your weak retorts.
When had BV ever done so?Huey » 11 Aug 2026, 10:46 am » wrote: ↑ I can assure you I am not BV and would not even contemplate being with a man in dress.
Why tag me in your losing battle?Huey » 11 Aug 2026, 11:04 am » wrote: ↑ You and @Blackvegetable certainly are losers. Spendng all this time entertaining with your weak retorts.
Goodness, I hate assholes that refer to themselves in the third person.
One, I am not losing and two it is entertaining watching you losers post about me. You guys are really butt hurt.